Printable View
So proud of how our guys competed tonight. Down 24-0 on the road vs #6 ranked team in the country and yet they clawed their way back to within 3. There is a lot to be excited about with @LATechFB . @ConferenceUSA play starts next week! #EverLoyalBe
https://twitter.com/tmcclelland/stat...066314752?s=21
Anybody catch it?
What is conflicting about that?
I'm sure he's referring to Tommy's use of the word "they" instead of "we." I read that as someone who is not taking any credit for what happened. Leaders take the blame and deflect the credit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tech52
First he uses "our guys" (inferring he is on their side) and then he use of "they" (as if he is an outsider)?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tech52
No, he says our guys because they are. Then he says they, because those guys (not him) were the ones who battled back.Quote:
Originally Posted by olddog75
Exactly. Its not that deep.Quote:
Originally Posted by theprofessor
Do bulldogs "claw" their way back?
Paw their way back?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bayou Dawg
This thread = Much ado about nothing.
The tweet was fine.
We actually agree on something? STOP THE PRESSES!Quote:
Originally Posted by HogDawg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jjcxFGEysEQuote:
Originally Posted by theprofessor
LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by theprofessor
Not a fan of our goof ball AD whose negotiation skills always favor our opponents and his possible future employers, but this was just some bad grammar in a tweet.Quote:
Originally Posted by HogDawg
The #everloyalbe BS is more upsetting than anything, since he is not.
Isn’t that counterintuitive? Wouldn’t future employers appreciate a shrewd negotiator and hope he would do the same if they hired him?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg