Maybe we should just call them all health care plans then.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Printable View
Maybe we should just call them all health care plans then.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Its not INSURANCEQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I didn’t call it insurance. I called them plans, as in “an Obamacare plan”.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
It was never “ a plan”. It was always horse shit
Not as bad of an idea as Reagan’s free health care for everyone EMTALA plan.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Free health care for everyone, Whew! that was (is) a bad plan! Anyone advocating for such nonsense should not be allowed to hold public office, and current office holders should be drummed out and beaten with a wet noodle.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Only a damn fool would believe any of the propaganda CNBC spews on any given day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
We have been through this already - CNBC is not liberal.Quote:
Originally Posted by brtransplant
Yes they are
It is business and financial market news. How can that be liberal?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
are you being purposely obtuse here? i don't know if cnbc is liberal or not (i honestly have never watched), but obviously anyone who reports on politics can (and usually does) bring their own political biases into the reporting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Hell, Trump appointed one of their anchors as the Director of the National Economic Council.
Well then, they must be totally unbiased.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
It is literally THE channel you watch if you are a capitalist or sit in a C suite. The only alternative is Bloomberg. CNBC gets all the CEO interviews and reports all the breaking economic news the fastest.Quote:
Originally Posted by arkansasbob
Liberals aren’t usually interested in keeping up with the latest bond auctions or market-moving corporate news.
You intentionally left out the best source https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+...EESpJ1mSnvc-M:
Too much emphasis on politics on that one. Way too little financial and business info on that channel.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Because I have credibility and I want to keep it, I have to agree with Goosey on this. There is one liberal dude, Andrew Sorkin, and a couple who are mostly middle-of-the-road with an ever slight (and I mean SLIGHT) lean to the left, but there is also a devout conservative, Joe Kernen, and a few who lean to the right, so overall the network is balanced. BUT! 90%+ of the time one's political leaning has nothing to do with it, as they are all focused on the stock market, and other markets, like the Chicago commodity market, and of course general economic news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I have seen both Sorkin and Kernen report on market/economic news and neither put any political spin on it. BUT!! those two did just have a heated exchange on the show...
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/squawk-box-co-hosts-andrew-ross-sorkin-joe-kernen-address-yesterdays-intense-on-air-argument/442489/
It actually made me cringe, because it is a departure from what you usually see on the network.
I get annoyed when they bring up politics, and it is usually Kernen that invokes it. There are plenty of channels you can watch if you want to hear politics. That is not what CNBC is for.
And I have seen Sorkin invoke it too. I have to admit, I would like to punch Sorkin in the nose. Just one good "pow!" I sometimes switch channels when he is on and is talking too much.
The events of the last few days have exposed the total fallacy of the Dimms' vote-by-mail scheme.
If people can get out to protest and then riot, they can also go to the polls and vote in person.
But that would not be anarchy. It is obvious the Dems want anarchy.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDawg
Of course they do.. if not, why would a top Clinton campaign staffer, fly to Minnesota with 250K in cash to post bail for rioters who were arrested?Quote:
Originally Posted by stodgdog
🤪Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Dam straight! And the socialist/commie Dems only want anarchy!Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDawg
Hell has frozen over.. This is something that I agree with...
https://i.imgur.com/3wRTUAY.jpg
So not true! You really still believe it’s only the conservatives interested inQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
“the latest bond auctions or market-moving corporate news”? 🤪
It’s mainly all the super wealthy liberal Dems.
Who do you think runs the banking industry and Wall Street? You believe the socialist Dems and media propaganda spin that it’s the rich conservatives? Lol!!
If this is even remotely true, this will not end well for democrats in November.
Black Approval of Trump tops 40%
https://summit.news/2020/06/05/rasmussen-black-approval-for-trump-surges-to-over-40
I don't put much, of any, faith in polls. Even if any poll is accurate, it only reflects the ever-changing mood of those surveyed at that moment. No poll on its own is scientifically significant. To accomplish that would require an extensive, macro survey and still be dependent on both the honesty and self-awareness of the participants. If I were to be surveyed I would first assess who is asking the question, what organization, and decide HOW I wanted to respond. I WILL VOTE FOR TRUMP FOR POTUS IN 2020! But, I might respond differently on a given survey if I thought it might help Trump get reelected. I am not alone in doing this.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Still, as I said, even if a poll returns very accurate results, those same folks might have a completely different opinion tomorrow!
All anyone has to do is remember the 2016 polls that had it locked up for Krooked Killary. There were a lot of folks who did not want the pollsters to know they were voting for Trump...or more accurately, were voting against Killary.
Lol @ RasmussenQuote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Keep dreaming.
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/05/87001...e-floyds-death
Blacks by a large majority think Trump has worsened race relations and his disapproval has only grown with all demographics, including nonwhites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Maybe.. we will see.. don't believe NPR either.. they like NYT had Hillary at 93% chance of winning POTUS day before election day. Do you remember that? I remember..
Trump colluded with Russia to win.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
He's correct, and NOTHING has changed.
The last sitting POTUS reelected during a recession was William McKinley, in 1900, and then in September, 1901, in the first year of his second term he was assassinated by a known anarchist. That's an important point that needs to be explored further...and I will. But for now, focusing on a president's reelection bid, it is hard, to say the least, to win during an economic downturn. Ford, Carter, and Bush 1 all lost reelection bids during a recession. Well, in Ford's case, it wasn't a RE-election bid but he was the sitting president. In Carter's case it was more than a horrid economy that got him smashed by the great one, Ronaldo Maximus.
So, now in 2020 we have another sitting POTUS seeking reelection and right now the economy is being hammered by a series of plots all contrived and designed to wreck the economy. I posted two years ago, during one of those over-blown, fake outrages on something Trump said or tweeted, whatever it was, that it doesn't matter what rhetoric he uses, he will be reelected if the economy is roaring. The leftist globalists (anarchists) have seized every opportunity to blow everything out of proportion all designed to create economic chaos. But, prior to the plots, the economy was strong it sits poised ready to rebound. It's like trying to hold a beach ball under water! The left is trying its level best, but that sucker just wants to pop up to the surface! Any relaxation of focus, and pop! up goes the beach ball (the economy).
This morning, the resident libtard on CNBC, Andrew Sorkin, was interviewing an economist. They were discussing the current situation, the stock market, employment, etc...and the economist mentioned that Ford, Carter, and Bush Sr. all lost during a recession. Sorkin's tongue was wagging, he was giddy with excitement...had that same look my dogs have when I am cutting some chunks of filet mignon and they anticipate the treat, tails wagging, eyes wide open...and then...Bam! the economist says, "but I don't think we will be in a recession come November, so that will be a non-factor." Poor ole Sorkin, his face sunk, his giddy smile turned upside down. Guess the left will just have to get Creepy Joe elected on his own merits....good luck with that! ;)
There have been leaks of conversations on democratic conference calls that a economic recovery is their biggest fear between now and November. They know that if the economy is coming back, they have zero chance at the polls.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
A quick note on polls ... I read recently that Republicans are very confident (some more confident than 2016) in spite of poll numbers in swing states showing there might be a problem. The reason? The 2016 election showed that Trump supporters disproportionately hang up when called for polling. This results in an oversampling of Democrats. Also, some people simply lie when polled. The article quoted someone as stating that they actually answered the opposite of what they really believed to throw the pollsters because "they didn't like some of the questions they were asking me".
In a data driven world your decisions are only as good as your data quality. That makes political polling a hard business to be in right now.
The polls don't look great for Trump. 538 does a good job of aggregating all of the incoming poll data.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
The second thing driving confidence is the expectation of a revival in the economy leading INTO the election. We will see if that confidence is founded.
...which is why all the haters are hoping for another wave of China Virus
And more riots...and maybe even killer hornets!Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
I totally agree. And Newt is almost always right.
Newt Gingrich: If Biden, Pelosi and Schumer are in charge in 2021 get ready for this nightmare.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/bide...newt-gingrichI
If liberal Dems win this Nov. our country will look like the movie ‘Idiocracy’ with those idiots in charge.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
I think this really surprised Van Jones..
Van Jones revisits three Trump voters as nation grapples with unrest
In the wake of Donald Trump's surprise election win in 2016, CNN's Van Jones went on a journey of discovery across America to understand why voters sent Trump to Washington.
Today, as the country wrestles with the death of George Floyd in police custody, the protest movement that grew from it, and the national conversation about race that is reverberating in every corner of American life, Jones revisited three of those voters who backed Trump in 2016 to see how they are experiencing this moment in history.
3 people who voted for Obama, 2 life long democrats.. all 3 plan to vote for Trump again in November.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/19/polit...ers/index.html
Trump is definitely the Idiocracy president.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Kamala Harris, who thinks she will be VP-nominee, win, and after Biden trips down some stairs and breaks his neck (with a push...) will be POTUS is not only threatening, but promising "to hunt down" all those who have supported Trump.
On a political blog I follow her supporters are saying, well, fair is fair, Trump went after all of Obama's supporters....he did? When? How? Someone on the blog posted how it was the obummers who tapped Trump's phone and their flunkies in the DOJ/FBI went after Trump with the whole fake dossier scam. No sensible reply to that comment other than, well, Comey and them were just trying to protect our country from Trump. At least one lefty admits the whole Russia thing was a contrived hoax, even if he offers a weak justification for it.
As for Ms. Harris, it's so easy to spout bullshit when she knows she won't have to back it up.
Polls are polls...at best they are a snapshot of those polled that day. Many of the polls survey something like 1,200 people and using some preconceived formula, based on demographics of those polled, they project results. That is not to say polls aren't or can't be somewhat indicative of current views...provided those polled are honest. It's the overall trends across many polls and consistency of the results that bears meaning. I agree, right now, Biden is leading in the polls, and doesn't really matter if his lead is 10 pts or 8 or 4 or 12! because you only have to win by 0.1% in key states to be elected.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
Trump needs, again, to reel in the rhetoric and focus on the great things he has done. He has to toot his own horn because the lamestream media certainly won't. But, he has to do it in a politically "correct" manner. Just stay focused on the facts...historic lows in unemployment, the new trade deals, etc...that is what Americans want to hear. That said, we all know that about 85-90% of the voters have already made up their minds, some for Trump, some for Biden, and nothing either candidate does will change that. It's that remaining 10-15% and those in the battleground states who will ultimately determine the next POTUS.
Carville says he'd vote for Biden if he picked Sarah Palin as a running mate. That's a good one.
With any poll at this stage and based on the numerous polling inaccuracies of 2016, look at the quoted margin of error and follow the rules below. These rules are based on several factors:
--Biased sample of significantly more Dimms (55%-60%) than Republicans (25%-30%) in most polls with the other 20% being independents.
--It was proven four years ago that a significant percentage of Trump supporters misreport their support to pollsters
--Current polls are of registered voters and are much less reliable than likely voter polls conducted closer to election day.
--Only state polls matter since national results are irrelevant.
If Biden leads by more than 2 times the margin of error, subtract 1-1.5 times the margin of error from his lead.
If Biden leads by 1.01 to 2 times the margin of error, it is actually a toss-up.
If Biden leads by up to the margin of error, Trump is actually leading by about half the margin of error.
If Trump leads by any margin, add the margin of error to his lead.
Plus Biden has gotten a free ride thus far. His own campaign managers have said they wish he could continue to hide out in his basement. They know what will happen once he's turned loose and the gaffes begin pouring forth. Did y'all know that C-19 has already killed 120 million Americans? That combined with the 150 million deaths caused by guns over the past few years doesn't leave many Americans alive. To that Biden says that is why we need open borders to replace the 270 million citizens lost!
Trump will rip him apart in the debates. But, more than that, Trump's incredibly impressive record of success on behalf of our nation and the average American will heavily influence voters. Biden is a loser, and he will make the USA a loser too.
The real election cycle is just getting started. Biden has not even been told who his VP is going to be (like Biden was going to get to pick it anyway). Three debates have been scheduled. Biden's dementia will be even more evident when this happens. Vast Vast Vast majority of Americans do not like, support, or stand with the CHOP, CHAZ, and Antifa, groups that have become the thugs of the democrat party. Trump just has to make the easy connection of defund the police to the democrats and socialism and case closed.
That’s your boy.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
This is just one reason why I will never vote for a democrat.. Don't think Biden and his supporters want your guns? Think again..
quote:
Ban the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.quote:
This will give individuals who now possess assault weapons or high-capacity magazines two options: sell the weapons to the government, or register them under the National Firearms Act.quote:
End the online sale of firearms and ammunitions.quote:Biden WILL ban manufacture of AR-15’s, AK-47’s, M-14’s, etc and remove the ability for you to have any sort of high capacity magazine (which could be any number they choose) He WILL ban online gun and ammo sales. He WILL enact red flag laws.
Incentivize state “extreme risk” laws. Extreme risk laws, also called “red flag” laws, enable family members or law enforcement officials to temporarily remove an individual’s access to firearms when that individual is in crisis and poses a danger to themselves or others.
This isn’t a “maybe he will, maybe he won’t” - it’s right on his campaign website. He is campaigning on removing the ability of a free to people to oppose government oppression. This is his starting point, and they certainly won’t ease restrictions throughout his 4 years. (if he’s elected)
Trump was going to cut the deficit, get MEXICO to pay for the wall, and REPLACE ObamaCare...so just because they say they will do something doesn’t mean much.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Still might happen when Trump gets the next 4 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
Good article imho.
Democrats can save our party – by voting Republican
Exclusive: Veteran radio talker Bob Just issues urgent call to moderate Dems
Bob Just By Bob Just
I'm glad legendary talk-show host Barry Farber didn't live to see leftist/anarchist mobs defacing or tearing down statues of men like Washington and Lincoln. I'm glad he missed seeing feckless state and local officials passively accepting these actions, or even approving them.
More
https://www.wnd.com/2020/06/democrat...ng-republican/
Well you make a point.. however, Trump has kept more campaign promises than any POTUS in my lifetime.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
He has kept all of his promises...except maybe the whole deficit thingy, but I honestly don't recall what he specifically said during the campaign re: the national deficit/debt. I'm not saying he didn't make some promise about it, just that I don't recall what it was. Regardless, the national deficit/debt is a problem that needs addressing.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
AND! we all know he would have a lot more accomplishments checked off the list if he had even a halfway cooperative Congress to work with, and if the Deep State wasn't constantly undermining everything. And that Deep State definitely includes the out-of-control judicial...
Some on here won’t like me quoting Hannity but he’s 100% right. And blacks I know agree.
Sean Hannity began Monday's program by urging Americans to ask themselves, "What has [Joe] Biden done to improve the lives of all Americans?"
"Did Biden pass criminal justice reform? No. Did he pass police reform? No. After Baltimore, after Ferguson, what did they do? Nothing. Who changed it? President Trump changed it," the host said.
Hannity contrasted Biden's record with President Trump's, highlighting the current administration's commitment to criminal justice reform and efforts to increase funding to historically black colleges and communities.
"Did Barack and Joe create opportunity zones in struggling neighborhoods?" Hannity asked. "No, that would be President Trump. President Trump has been in office less than four years and during that time, pre-coronavirus, [there was] record-low unemployment for African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, Asian-Americans youth unemployment and African-American youth unemployment. That is great for our collective American family."
Joe Biden's blunders show no signs of slowing downVideo
HANNITY CALLS OUT BIDEN 'DISTURBING PATTERN OF RACIAL RHETORIC'
"Recently," Hannity went on, "the president took important steps to restore order in American cities, including those tough measures against vandals -- those who have been attempting to tear down any and every statue across the country. By the way, where does Joe stand on these issues?"
Addressing his viewers directly, Hannity urged voters to ask themselves whether Biden is "really fit to serve as a commander in chief."
"Does Joe Biden have the mental alertness, does he have the stamina, does he have the strength to take on what is the hardest job in the world?" the host asked. "And what is going to happen when he finally has to leave his basement bunker for good.
"Will the mob and the media asked Biden the same questions they asked [Ronald] Reagan about age and mental acuity?" he concluded. "Don't hold your breath.
"Don't expect Biden to leave the basement."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannit...ntal-alertness
And yet, he's currently got a historic polling lead over Trump. Why would he come out of his basement? Trump being Trump is about all he needs.
We don’t need Biden to do anything. We just need someone that will stop destroying America.
And that is all he's got too! Biden is worse than an empty suit, like obummer. Creepy Joe is legit stupid and a real danger to the national security of this country and thus to the free world. Yep, the ONLY thing anyone can say about Biden is "he's not Trump." I realize for those suffering from TDS that's enough. But Biden offers nothing of substance nor merit and is wholly unqualified and unworthy of the position of POTUS.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
That is why Biden's handlers, his "puppeteers," are doing their best to keep him in the basement. No one with an IQ above single digits would vote for Biden based solely on his own merits. Some will vote AGAINST Trump and do so by pressing the button next to Biden's name...I get it. But, no one is voting FOR Biden. Now...I understand this thought process since it is similar to the strategy I employed in 2016. The biggest difference though is this....both Trump and Biden have a track record of political leadership at/near the top. Under Trump the nation has thrived, under Biden (obummer) the nation languished during the WORST 8-year term of any prez in US history. No, it was not Biden per se, it was obummer screwing up, but the few times obummer got something right like sending in the SEALS to get Bin Laden, Biden was opposed to it! obummer scored something 2 or 3 TDs in 8 years, and Biden was against the called play that made it happen. The guy is a royal loser!
So, I don't blame his handlers keeping him locked up in the basement. They know what a f--k up he is! I just find it hard to fathom how any "thinking" person could vote for the basement poster child.
And how, pray tell, is someone doing that, destroying America? Give some specifics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
How about Trump’s piss-poor mismanagement of COVID response, particularly the failure to prioritize and triple redundancy the testing options and the failure to actively promote (while he actually undermined) disease control through mask wearing.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
This failure has both a human life impact and an enormous jobs impact and resulted in a federal response that exploded the national debt.
There is no reason why our results couldn’t have been more like Taiwan. 24 million population, less than 500 sick, 7 dead.
The way he treated a non-partisan health crisis as a political wedge issue that threatened American lives and livelihood is really just a microcosm of his failed presidency.
I will bet you did not know that H1-B visas built this country...
quote:
Trump “ended H1B visas the rest of this year,” Biden said in a June 27 town hall meeting organized by NBC News. “That will not be in my administration.”
“The people coming on these [H-1B] visas have built this country,” Biden added.
Millions of people are currently out of jobs.. yet Biden wants to bring in foreign workers ... this is the democratic candidate for POTUS..
Just means that those foreign high tech workers will go to work for Chinese companies like Huawei instead of companies like Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon and other high tech companies that drive American competitiveness.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Trump is a moron.
"Gotta learn to code"...Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I saw a report on Taiwan's handling of the Chicom virus way back in March. They had these infrared scanners placed in public places, monitored by uniformed police (maybe military), and if a person showed a hot spot it was indicative of a fever. So that person was ushered into a chamber where some medical staff took temps, and did some tests. If the person was C-19 positive, they were immediately shot and their bodies cremated in a furnace....okay, I made up that last part. But they were escorted straight to quarantine and their families notified of their location and kept apprised of their condition. People were literally hijacked off the street, out of train stations, airports, etc... Now, seriously, do you think Americans would even remotely tolerate that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I suppose in your Orwellian world, yeah, you'd be okay with that. But just think what would happen when the first black guy resisted being ushered to quarantine. A scuffle would ensue, and BLM and NFL players would go nuts on Twitter condemning the action. That would put a swift end to your Taiwanese solution!
And oh, BTW, you are full of shit! Democrat guvnors and mayors were the ones who dropped the ball and allowed the pandemic to get as bad as it did.
http://research.newamericaneconomy.o...6/pnae_h1b.pdfQuote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Not exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cen...se-looks%3famp
How many international airports are in Taiwan? How many test have they performed. Can you independently verify your data?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Four. The Taiwan data is legit.Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle2180
The US had the worst response to COVID of any developed country. It is amazing but totally predictable how much America has regressed under Trump.
Share the source then. Or better yet please move to Taiwan and quit complaining about the US response.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle2180
We could just remove the guy who failed to lead the response.
Local CBS Atlanta News: Bullets Flying, Situation Intolerable, City Leaders Don’t CarePosted on 6/30/20 at 10:21 pm
https://tdzone-fandroppingsllc.netdn...ttons/uArw.png37https://tdzone-fandroppingsllc.netdn...ttons/dArw.png1
https://tdzone-fandroppingsllc.netdn...ayout/bkm1.png
Just now.
Edgewood Ave mostly.
Residents and business owners have had enough.
Bullets are flying day and night. Played several video clips of people running for cover in their yards as the sound of gunfire erupts.
Several shooting victims. Streets are filled with roving gangs and cruising carloads of people at night but the shootings are happening all hours of the day.
Residents and business owners say city leadership has abandoned responsibility and allowed the city to descend into lawlessness.
Police are not responding and are not present.
Business owners are frustrated, say they cannot operate under these conditions.
City responded to comment, saying they hope to eventually stabilize the situation through community outreach. :rolleyes:
This is happening in ATL, NYC, Seattle, Minneapolis, LA, STL and the democratic leadership is allowing it to happen. This will push a lot of people over to Trump.
16yo was shot and killed yesterday in CHOP in Seattle.. a 14 yo was seriously wounded. Yet this is the "Summer of Love",
Lord have mercy on us, even Hannity is saying wear a mask when you’re out and about.
Pence, too.
The US is not winning right now.
Not MMA Sensi Shawn... sorry but his whole MMA stuff is way over the top..Quote:
Originally Posted by turbodawg
One side wants to violently destroy property that doesn't belong to them and you are worried about mask wearing?Quote:
Originally Posted by turbodawg
You are worried about property when lives are at stake? Ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
...says the guy who is ok with killing black babiesQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
...says the guy that would strip black women of their reproductive rights.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
you layed first claim to the moral high ground not me. Just pointing out the inconsistencies of your moral compassQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
There is no inconsistency. I don’t support the killing of babies.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Semantics per “the law” does not make you a better person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Abortion is one of the places where systemic racism is most obvious. Margret Sanger created what became Planned Parenthood to suppress the black population. It's the closest thing to genocide that we've got here in the US.
If some of you actually engaged the discussion, you would know that there are a lot of folks in the BLM movement that recognize this and actively oppose it...though I'm sure Hannity and Rush don't talk about that because it blows up there narrative that this is all just politics to hurt Trump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
Kinda hard when BLM states that one of their "goals" is to destroy the nuclear family..
Again, the movement and the organization are NOT the same thing. That's obvious if you actually look into it, but it doesn't fit the narrative, so most here won't look into it.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
The organization or the movement?Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Where is that goal stated?
All of you should research this and decide if this is what you want. I expected that a President Biden would enforce the Obama administration’s radical AFFH (Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing) regulation to the hilt. That is exactly what Biden promises to do. By itself, that would be more than enough to end America’s suburbs as we’ve known them,
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
so is blacklivesmatter.com the movement or the organization??
We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tech70
That's why I have land in Louisiana that I can hunt, fish, raise my own beef, chickens and be mostly self-sufficient without having crazy left leaning politicians bothering me..
Closest I can find is this. In it's context, it's not exactly as Frisco described it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLM
The organization. The one with only 13 chapters in the US...Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Sounds like a dog whistle encouraging women of color to engage in genocide of their own race to reduce the number of them in society. Shame on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I am not encouraging anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
more semantics to hide your selective valuesQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
That seems to be a common trait among our soy boys.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Your obsession with masculinity is noted.Quote:
Originally Posted by glm47
No, the leftist have deployed the killing black babies strategy for decades. Black women can get abortions at will.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
But you must as you support all the candidates and the “Democrat party of death” which so loves to kill millions of babies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Guisslapp is completely blind to his own hypocrisy. He's a typical globalist Marist. He's a narcissist in every sense of the word. He truly believes in his heart that he has the answer to everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS