Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DawgyNWindow
A I supposed to care about the speech of the wife of the presidential candidate????? I am just not that trivial.
Now, maybe I do care that the wife of the other candidate is a pervert, was disbarred for being a general scumbag and was nearly impeached by congress. But I guess that's illogical as well.
The drive by media and the liberals think we should care. We should ignore treason, but monitor speech writing VERY closely. Plagiarism is a great indication of character.:D
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Every national-level political speech is written by a speech writer. Before giving the speech, people should have to do the disclaimer thing. Something like... "I am So-and So, and while I did not write this speech I am about to give, I do agree with it... Well, I think I do. I haven't really read the whole thing yet."
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
maddawg
You didn't answer my question.
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DawgyNWindow
A I supposed to care about the speech of the wife of the presidential candidate????? I am just not that trivial.
Now, maybe I do care that the wife of the other candidate is a pervert, was disbarred for being a general scumbag and was nearly impeached by congress. But I guess that's illogical as well.
I will plagiarize this. But since I told you, its okay.
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cal&Ken
I guess at the end of the day though, a third party vote is simply a wasted vote for Hillary. Given 2 choices, I choose the better of the 2, and like it or not, there are only 2 to choose from. Anything else is simply a vote for Hillary. Third party voters are saying you accept more criminal activity, more disrespect of police officers, and an unsafe environment for our children. I hate that anyone is willing to make that choice- I know I will not, and I am absolutely voting my convictions with no regret.
Balderdash. Hogwash. Baloney.
I like ya C&K, but I have to take exception to this. I don't OWE a thing to either the Dems or the Reps. I'll vote my conscience, and if that's a vote for Gary Johnson or Jill Stein or Batman ... it's a vote for that individual and for nobody else. If either of the 'major' parties want my vote, then they can nominate somebody who's neither an evil genius (eg. Gore, Obama, Hillary), nor an evil doofus (eg. GWB, Trump, Cruz).
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
It's certainly not a big deal beyond the fact that it was incredibly stupid. Doesn't that bother Trump supporters? Doesn't it bother them that the campaign would do something so foolish? Everyone on the planet knows that these women don't write a word of what they say in these types of speeches. How in the world did this pass through the team that was tasked with creating it?
Are they actually trying to win? I'm really beginning to wonder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
You didn't answer my question.
Which one?
- doesn't bother me at all
- foolish? If it was intentional, it was brilliant.
- passed through because it was part of the plan to draw attention
- Yes they are winning now.
Keep in mind the drive by and haters DO NOT like showing beautiful conservative women. If they do they ALWAYS attempt to smear their intelligence or character. Trump's camp knew they were going to bash her no matter what. This move by Trumps people is free advertisement. They are playing the drive-bys like a fiddle.
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Champ967
Balderdash. Hogwash. Baloney.
The only votes that matter are swing state votes. I don't live in one and I don't think you do either. 3rd party candidates need to be full time candidates, not just at election time. Until they do that, we are stuck with a two party system.
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
maddawg
Which one?
- doesn't bother me at all
- foolish? If it was intentional, it was brilliant.
- passed through because it was part of the plan to draw attention
- Yes they are winning now.
Keep in mind the drive by and haters DO NOT like showing beautiful conservative women. If they do they ALWAYS attempt to smear their intelligence or character. Trump's camp knew they were going to bash her no matter what. This move by Trumps people is free advertisement. They are playing the drive-bys like a fiddle.
He can do that without the negative press. He shouldn't need it. He's running against the least popular candidate ever. Why does he need parlor tricks?
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
He can do that without the negative press. He shouldn't need it. He's running against the least popular candidate ever. Why does he need parlor tricks?
This one involves his beautiful wife who is hated just because she is beautiful, but they get incensed with hot AND intelligent. This particular "parlor trick" took the attention away from her and put it on the speech writers.
Remember the magnifying glass they had on Palin while they ignored the dumbest comments ever by Biden and the constant lying by Hillary and Obama?
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cool Hand Clyde
3rd party candidates need to be full time candidates, not just at election time.
Maybe they are, and you just don't know ...
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
maddawg
Remember the magnifying glass they had on Palin while they ignored the dumbest comments ever by Biden and the constant lying by Hillary and Obama?
The hypocrisy of the left is not a point of disagreement between you and I. I do remember the Palin coverage...how did that election turn out?
If Trump had substance, at this point, he'd be running away with it. Instead, he's playing tabloid publicity games. Really small time...
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Champ967
Maybe they are, and you just don't know ...
If a bear shits in the woods and no one is there to see it, is the pope still Catholic? That statement sums up 3rd party campaign competency.
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
If Trump had substance, at this point, he'd be running away with it. Instead, he's playing tabloid publicity games. Really small time...
No he is not. He is refusing to fight a battle with the drive bys he knows he can't win. This will be forgotten in a 48 hour cycle. The attention now goes to him and what he is about to say. He will light up the left like all the others have been afraid to do. The hissy fits are on the way.
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
maddawg
The attention now goes to him and what he is about to say.
That's my point...he never actually gets to the substance. Yet, his supporters assure me that he's just about to have something to say worth listening to. All I see is a guy who is more concerned about trending on twitter than actually offering any solutions.
Re: 2016 Presidential Campaign
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cool Hand Clyde
If a bear shits in the woods and no one is there to see it, is the pope still Catholic? That statement sums up 3rd party campaign competency.
If the best candidates are shut out by the corporate media conspiracy, are the major parties' sociopaths still your only choices?