Yep...she will lie her ass off!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by T1
Printable View
Yep...she will lie her ass off!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by T1
Did you catch her on Fox this morning? Played clip of FBI guy saying she lied about emails, and her response was, "well, that's not what I heard him say."Quote:
Originally Posted by 70TECHGRAD
Said being a crooked liar is just an ufair characuture of her from Republicans.
She's not as good at it as Bill was, but still pretty good.
What a truly sad testament to our country that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are the two "best" candidates we could scrape off the floor to lead our nation.
I was just thinking this morning how Pence vs Kaine would be a much more decent American election. We tend to go with extremes... and neither Pence nor Kaine wanted the job. It takes a certain ego to want that job.
I see and hear this a lot. The statement implies they are both bad and/or would be bad for America. We KNOW one of them is and has been bad (even evil). We don't know about the other.Quote:
Originally Posted by DogsWin
I agree. Anyone with an ounce of sense already knows Killary is bad for America...and the free world. She's proven that, and IF she does indeed embrace obummer's policies, then we are toast. On the other hand, Trump is truly an unknown, as it pertains to his policies once in office.
Killary first....I put "if" in capital letters for emphasis for a reason. I'm not altogether certain she will just be a 3rd obummer term. The Klintons don't like obummer, and won't feel any obligation to extend his tenure. Besides, remember, she is in deep on Wall Street. They own her. So, by default, I see her having to do some things that will benefit the economy.
For Trump, we are told he is a 'crap in Repub clothing. So, who really knows where his term will take us?
We know he's running to her husband's left. That's bad enough for me. Wait till his trade war starts. You think the economy is special now? Just wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by maddawg
Oh, and, "There's a possibility he won't be as bad as Hillary" hardly negates Dogswin's point. This election is sad...anyway you paint it.
they aren't the two best. They are the two chosen.Quote:
Originally Posted by DogsWin
Presidents aren't elected, they're selected. I believe someone famous once said that.
The Evil Genius vs. the Evil DoofusQuote:
Originally Posted by maddawg
Think about this: After 8 years of Obama's dictatorial "phone and pen" to bypass Congress, the Supreme Court changing Obamacare to make it legal, and attempts to "regulate" the 2nd Amendment, the Democrats are now (correctly) lecturing the Republican candidate on the Constitution. How the heck did that happen?!!
the law is not being enforced.Quote:
Originally Posted by T1
The economy is wallowing at 1.2% growth (growth???) for this year. Wow! obummer had been averaging an all-time worst 1.7% for his tenure, and this will just drag it down even more. A new high....in low.
The crappy economic numbers are staggering. So! Killary pledges to stay the course, eh. A 3rd obummer term, eh.
Nah! I don't believe it. Not even Killary's economy, should we have the misfortune of her being elected, will be this bad. It's also amazing how the lamestream media, thru the support of market makers like Warren Buffet and George Soros, and others, have covered this up. About 40% of the American public actually believe obummer has done well on the economy. And another 15% say it's "okay" and will get better. Guess that's because the libtards have wrecked our education system too.
Just for clarity: the US economy has been the absolute worst, under obummer, in our history, dating back to 1776.
According To Analysis By The Tax Foundation, Clinton's Tax Proposals Would "Reduce The Economy's Size By 1 Percent." "According to the Tax Foundation's Taxes and Growth Model, Hillary Clinton's tax plan would reduce the economy's size by 1 percent in the long run." (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, "Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton's Tax Proposals," Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)
According To Analysis By The Tax Foundation, Clinton's Tax Proposals Would Result In "311,000 Fewer Full-Time Equivalent Jobs." "The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income." (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, "Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton's Tax Proposals," Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)
According To Analysis By The Tax Foundation, Clinton's Tax Proposals Would "Lead To 0.8 Percent Lower Wages." The plan would lead to 0.8 percent lower wages, a 2.8 percent smaller capital stock, and 311,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income." (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, "Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton's Tax Proposals," Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)