Printable View
The U.S. officials told Reuters that Trump revealed the information to the Russians without consulting the ally that provided it, which threatens to jeopardize a long-standing intelligence-sharing agreement.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/po...KCN18C19Y?il=0
According to the NYT just now:
"The officials, who were not authorized to discuss the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that Israel previously had urged the United States to be careful about the handling of the intelligence that Mr. Trump discussed."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile....ussia.amp.html
The fact that we have current and former intelligence officials leaking all this stuff kind of speaks for itself.
They should be outed and prosecuted for leaking it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
The fact they are willing to take such risks tells you how concerned they are about Trump. These are people who understand what is at stake,Quote:
Originally Posted by LATechBanjo
Are you even reading what you are typing?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
So, we have people who are not authorized to divulge something supposedly ratting out someone who divulged something they were not authorized to divulge?????? WTF! Gullible much?
Another anon source, too! I smell sedition.
Keep thinking about it. You might get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
I get it already. Unless I see evidence and non-anon sources, it's all BS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Here's one for you, though. Speaks volumes that a DNC staffer was afraid of Hillary becoming president. Or, do you choose to igore this and only believe the ones that support what you think?
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/05...-to-wikileaks/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
What have they been doing the past 8.5 years?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
This is the question that interests me. Obama and HRC would be crucified in "conservedom" if they did exactly what Trump did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
That doesn't mean THAT crucifixion would be warranted, but while flying the banner of those who've been wronged by bias and double standards, it certainly seems hypocritical (not speaking of those on the board per se but folks like Hannity would be going ballistic if the shoe was on the other foot.)
Interesting story. Hope to learn more - and that they catch who is responsible.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
Don't know who they are - so i couldn't tell you. But they have talked to no fewer than three news outlets now.Quote:
Originally Posted by JuBru
Interesting that you still call BS when there is so much smoke and you have both Trump and McMaster implicitly disclosing that classified information was shared. All of the facts that are known seem to corroborate that the intel related to the laptop bomb threat. All this corroboration gives good credibility to the original WaPo report.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
That is absolutely correct. Republicans would be flipping their shit if it was Hillary doing this as POTUS. I do wonder if we would even find out though.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
So looking more into this story. It appears that not only is FoxNews reporting but their contributors are also the source of the "facts."Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
Meanwhile the family seems to be unconvinced of the connection to Wikileaks
"We are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence," the family said in a statement earlier Tuesday.
"The services of the private investigator who spoke to press was offered to the Rich family and paid for by a third party, and contractually was barred from speaking to press or anyone outside of law enforcement or the family unless explicitly authorized by the family."
"Rich's family, which has previously sought help from the public in uncovering information about their son's death, had been seeking help in solving their son's murder.