Presidential Election 2020

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by detltu

The precedent has been set unfortunately. Mostly to cheers from the left.

---

Do you not recall the crowds literally cheering?

“If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor...”

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...an-orig-bw.cnn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Do you not recall the crowds literally cheering?

“If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor...”

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...an-orig-bw.cnn

---

I'd cheer even louder if she were made to face a firing squad for her high crimes and treason.

A NXIVM whistleblower has provided testimony that Krooked Killary and Sen. Gillibrand have been, and are, involved in the sex trade of little girls, mostly Mexican and now Central American girls. Killary is a devout lesbian Satanist (no surprise there), exploiting little girls for money and her own sick pleasure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by detltu

What's your point? I missed the part where he actually locked her up, but maybe it's coming. There is a difference between saying a political opponent should face legal consequences for their actions ("lock her up") and actually weaponizing our institutions against political opponents (IRS, FBI, DOJ). Don't get me wrong, the right will cheer this on just the same.

---

Let's not also forget CIA's John Brennan who served as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from March 2013 to January 2017. And Obama did this and just might pay for his mistake and treason using for weaponizing the IRS, FBI, DOJ and CIA!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Do you not recall the crowds literally cheering?

“If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor...”

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...an-orig-bw.cnn

---

Fair enough, while one side was talking about it, the other side was actually doing it. The right was cheering it on as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by detltu

Fair enough, while one side was talking about it, the other side was actually doing it. The right was cheering it on as well.

---

How was “the other side” doing it? And I assume we aren’t going to count how “the other side” led an investigation, made public, about the contender on the same “other side”?

Only one of the investigations was made public prior to the election. Only one of the investigations had any impact on who took power. The Machiavellian theories fall apart right there.

And the only reason that Trump had a special prosecutor investigating his campaign was because he obstructed the FBI’s Russia investigation (of which he was at the time not a target) in a way that made him look guilty AF.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

And the only reason that Trump had a special prosecutor investigating his campaign was because he obstructed the FBI’s Russia investigation (of which he was at the time not a target) in a way that made him look guilty AF.

---

Damn! you are wrong so much it's gotten monotonous.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...quiry-new-memo

Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for obstruction?

:laugh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

How was “the other side” doing it? And I assume we aren’t going to count how “the other side” led an investigation, made public, about the contender on the same “other side”?

---

That one doesn't hold up my friend. Hopefully you know that though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...quiry-new-memo

Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for obstruction?

---

Doubtful. Even if a decent case could be built against him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

And the only reason that Trump had a special prosecutor investigating his campaign was because he obstructed the FBI’s Russia investigation (of which he was at the time not a target) in a way that made him look guilty AF.

---

That one doesn't hold up either.

Don’t hold up to what? What can possibly refute either statement?