Yes because only people who truly care about their children would have turned down asylum 3000 miles ago to illegally storm the US border with picture op kids in tow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Printable View
Yes because only people who truly care about their children would have turned down asylum 3000 miles ago to illegally storm the US border with picture op kids in tow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Child abuse by the islamic hordes.
http://media-cdn.wehco.com/img/photo...a1b0444dfa.jpg
Palestinian protesters run for cover from teargas fired by Israeli soldiers during clashes with Israeli troops along the Gaza Strip border with Israel, east of Beit Lahiya, Gaza Strip, Saturday, March 31, 2018. (AP Photo/Adel Hana)
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-31NiQPjePc...littleboys.jpg
http://passionforpeaceisrael.files.w...hildabuse3.jpghttp://passionforpeaceisrael.files.w...childabuse.jpg
Looks like you visit the same websites as that package bomber.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
You are a complete idiot at times! That's strictly from a google picture searchQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
to prove my point to you.
At times?Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
70% of illegals are on welfare.
They come here to work, we are told. They come here seeking economic opportunity, we are told.
How do they get welfare?Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
Qualified immigrants can be eligible. The list includes refugees, asylees, Cuban/Haitian entrants, and others.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Right, so “not illegals.”Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
semantics...Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
You mean all those "asylees" are not actually seeking asylum? :shocked2: I get it though, since they are "legal" it's okay for them to go directly on welfare.
Obviously collecting a government check is a job Americans are not willing to do. Isn't this what we are told?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
You are conflating two separate classes of immigrants.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Asylees that are “qualified” and are eligible for welfare are fleeing persecution (they may or may not also be looking for better economic opportunity). Illegal immigrants that just come here for better opportunity (and thus not “qualified”) is what Dawg80 appeared to be referring to in his quote. That is why I asked for him to explain what he meant.
CNN or MSNBC could not have said it better. It's really all about the children.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
The study that I saw listed them as non-citizens vs citizens without regard to immigration. 63% of non-citizens were receiving benefits versus 35% for citizens. I think it was done on a household basis.
It's a problem, but it's a separate (but related) issue to illegal immigration.
There has to be more nuance to that. Do you have a link? Because that's got to be leaving out big swathes of non-citizens to be that high (it'd make sense for a particular category like asylees or something like that maybe).Quote:
Originally Posted by detltu