Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Who said the following:

I rise in strong opposition to S. 139, the “FISA Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 2017,” which reauthorizes Section 702 of FISA for six years without enacting adequate protections for our privacy.

Supporters of this measure want to convince us a new, incredibly narrow warrant provision actually constitutes reform. It does not.

Our right to privacy does not begin when the Department of Justice has a fully formed criminal case against us.

Nor does it begin when prosecutors enter our emails and text messages into evidence against us in court.

The Constitution guarantees far more than this. Our right to privacy protects us when the government first makes its decision to search our private communications for information it might find useful.

S. 139 falls well short of this basic guarantee. We therefore cannot—we must not—support this bill.

Make no mistake: S. 139 is not a “compromise.” The Judiciary Committee, the technology companies, civil society, and other critical stakeholders were shut out of this conversation long ago.

S. 139 does not include a meaningful warrant requirement. The rule in this bill does not apply to most searches of the Section 702 database. It does not apply to a query for any information that “could mitigate a threat,” an exception that threatens to swallow the entire rule.

And as a result, S. 139 allows the FBI unfettered access to this information, for purely domestic cases, without a warrant.

---

This was Nadler, opposing the bill that Trump ultimately signed.

Nadler was also against impeaching Clinton and he's one of the leaders on impeaching Trump and there's no evidence of Trump committing a crime and there was evidence of Clinton committing a crime. So, what is your point? Nadler is always against Trump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DONW

Nadler was also against impeaching Clinton and he's one of the leaders on impeaching Trump and there's no evidence of Trump committing a crime and there was evidence of Clinton committing a crime. So, what is your point? Nadler is always against Trump.

---

Only one of them abused the power of their office to solicit foreign interference in our election and cheat our country.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Only one of them abused the power of their office to solicit foreign interference in our election and cheat our country.

---

I haven't heard that about Clinton. Is there any proof of this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Only one of them abused the power of their office to solicit foreign interference in our election and cheat our country.

---

Nadler is lying and abusing his power by impeaching the President and that is much worse than holding up our tax money from going to a corrupt government. How is Trump "cheating our country" by holding up our tax money from a foreign country with a corrupt government? Rand Paul said yesterday that he wouldn't give money to any foreign country and I agree with him. There's a lot of things we need to fix in our own country before the government starts giving our tax money away.

The only reason they are trying to impeach Trump is because they know he's going to get re-elected. This grab for power by the dems will be over 2 weeks after it hits the Senate and Trump will be re-elected and we'll KEEP AMERICA GREAT FOR 4 MORE YEARS AND MY IRA WILL MAKE A LOT OF MONEY. I'm sure you took your 401K out of the market after Trump won. That must hurt sitting there watching the stock market go up every day and you can't put your money back in it because of your hatred of the President.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by detltu

I haven't heard that about Clinton. Is there any proof of this?

---

Can you imagine the outrage of Gooselip and the crooked news media if Trump had oral sex with an intern in the oval office?:shocked2:

Ok, Boomer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Ok, Boomer

---

You like those subtle insults don’t you?

Are you going to disappear again when your new fantasy gets destroyed like Russia collusion did?

You remind me of Hamilton Burger.

Enjoy the next 5 years with Trump as your president.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Ok, Boomer

---

You like those subtle insults don’t you?

Are you going to disappear again when your new fantasy gets destroyed like Russia collusion did?

You remind me of Hamilton Burger.

Enjoy the next 5 years with Trump as your president.

Ok, Boomer.

Great win for Boris Johnson and conservatives in the UK today! That will also help the US and our President.

It isn't happening.

McConnell says 'zero chance' Trump is removed, 'one or two Democrats' could vote to acquit

https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannity-exclusive-senate-majority-leader-mcconnell-says-theres-no-chance-president-trump-is-removed

The election results in Britain scare the crap out of any Democrat with a brain. The Republicans will kill the Democrats in November.

What do y'all think of Graham and McConnell saying there will be no trial in the Senate? Instead there will be a motion to dismiss the impeachment and that will be that.

I understand Graham/McConnell's view of this. This whole impeachment crap is a hoax and doesn't deserve to be treated as legit. Okay, I get it. But, on the other hand, here is a chance for the Repubs to subpeana the hell out of the dems and their evil operatives and bring the TRUTH to the American people. Naturally, there are some on our side wanting to see the Senate pursue this. Any opinions/comments?

I agree that it should be pursued. Call all the witnesses who have been denied this far. Debunk as many of the wild theories as you can with actual fact witnesses and not social science majors. If you shut down enough angles, maybe, just maybe, the Dems will learn it will never happen and get back to governing.