Global Warming Cont...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saltydawg

bump^

Here is the update.


http://people.uleth.ca/~dan.johnson/sunspots.htm

No correlation between sunspot cycle length and the global warming since 1980.

---

That doesn't complete my graph. You are looking at number of sunspots, not the inverse sunspot cycle length.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RealityCheck

He may be King, but the kingdom is largely deserted. Fox News primetime ratings are higher than CNN's and MSNBC's combined.

---

I may not know about ratings, but personally for someone who abhors cold weather, this works for me!

My dad lived in Detroit, omg... that place is freezing let alone the South during winters!

It is the sun.

BTW, it is also appropriate for this thread to be on the political forum since that's all discussions about man-made GW are...political. No science at all.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stm

And for all you sun-doubters (not mentioning any names, NaCly) I want you to be outside the space shuttle the next time one of those non-factor solar flares happens. Can you say....toast!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

That doesn't complete my graph. You are looking at number of sunspots, not the inverse sunspot cycle length.

---

Are you going to be able to complete it?

If not, please explain the mechanism whereby the inverse sunspot cycle length would impact sea surface temperatures.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saltydawg

Are you going to be able to complete it?

---

Don't have the data.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

It is the sun.

BTW, it is also appropriate for this thread to be on the political forum since that's all discussions about man-made GW are...political. No science at all.

---

Wrong. AGW is science but what we are going to do about it is political.:icon_wink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/56456.stm

And for all you sun-doubters (not mentioning any names, NaCly) I want you to be outside the space shuttle the next time one of those non-factor solar flares happens. Can you say....toast!

---

The best place to see solar flares is up North in Alaska or Yukon. However, I'm sure you are not suggesting any link between solar flares and global temperatures (or are you?).

The sun is the cause of temp fluctuations on Earth. Anyone can google the subject and see article after article from reputable astrophysicists that have studied it and say so. The other side has that goofy algore.

Period. End of story.

Next!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saltydawg

If not, please explain the mechanism whereby the inverse sunspot cycle length would impact sea surface temperatures.

---

Think about it.

An actuary ran did a correllation study on various sunspot parameters in 2008. Look it up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Think about it.

---

I did. If you graph was valid, you can bet your boots it would have been updated. In other words, the correlation after 1990 turned to monkey doo-doo.

I can see the 11 year sunspot cycle influencing weather, but climate is completely a different story.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

An actuary ran did a correllation study on various sunspot parameters in 2008. Look it up.

---

http://digitaldiatribes.wordpress.co...cing-analysis/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saltydawg

I did. If you graph was valid, you can bet your boots it would have been updated. In other words, the correlation after 1990 turned to monkey doo-doo.

I can see the 11 year sunspot cycle influencing weather, but climate is completely a different story.

---

You are an idiot. That data was from a 1991 study by Friis-Christensen. There was no data past 1990 because it did not exist at the time of the study.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Think about it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by saltydawg

I did.

---

You clearly didn't.