Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
Nor did anybody not think the Dems would do anything to win, including cheat.
Well, except maybe you.
Haha...their master evil plan? Count legally cast ballots.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
Haha...their master evil plan? Count legally cast ballots.
Legally cast ballots is such a relative term with the democrats and RINOs.
It's not the casting of ballots that is in question. It's the counting of those ballots. Try to focus on polling stats instead of real numbers.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
Haha...their master evil plan? Count legally cast ballots.
The point is, are they legal? Arguments are that in many many 1000s of cases the ballots are not legal nor were they counted legally. You can’t jump to the end without working through the middle.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bone_afide_Dawg
The point is, are they legal? Arguments are that in many many 1000s of cases the ballots are not legal nor were they counted legally. You can’t jump to the end without working through the middle.
You wish.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
You wish.
And you wish, not. A brilliantly hollow point.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bone_afide_Dawg
And you wish, not. A brilliantly hollow point.
The person arguing that the votes were illegal or counted improperly really should have some evidence for that.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bone_afide_Dawg
The point is, are they legal? Arguments are that in many many 1000s of cases the ballots are not legal nor were they counted legally. You can’t jump to the end without working through the middle.
No good arguments say that. No evidence, just a whiner trying to make himself feel better by casting doubt about n a result that makes him look bad.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FriscoDog
Again.. many democrats are calling for the elimination of the electoral college. This requires a constitutional amendment, which even if it did make it through Congress, would never pass the the state ratification process, as many states would be giving up their voice in a presidential election.
They're trying to subvert it with the "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact" that says regardless of the actual result of the state, the electoral college votes will go to the candidate with the most votes nationwide.
Right now, 16 states consisting of 196 electoral votes have made the pact. 4 states consisting of a further 60 electoral votes are pending in some form. 18 other states have it cooking. So far, none of the 16 have acted on it because the pact requires having the 270.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
as someone who wishes both candidates could lose, that early-morning biden bump does look pretty fishy. not saying it's illegitimate, but i hope they did a good job of keeping things transparent and well-documented.
also, the subversion of the electoral college is a terrible idea. campaigns are built around winning the electoral vote, and the electoral college reality influences voters. for example, how many republicans stay home in california and new york because they know their vote is useless? if you want to change it to popular vote, change it with an amendment, but don't pretend the popular vote in any given election is indicative of what it would be if that were the way the election was decided.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
No good arguments say that. No evidence, just a whiner trying to make himself feel better by casting doubt about n a result that makes him look bad.
You really need to practice your reading comprehension skills. First, re-read what I wrote. I asked a question and pointed out what’s taking place. I didn’t draw a conclusion and for sure wasn’t whining about anything. For someone that I see post a lot on here I really thought you would’ve been more astute than what you just showed.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
If all they are doing in Philly is "counting legally cast votes" then why have they denied GOP poll watchers from the process? (we all know why...)
Stupid-ass protestors are burning American flags in NY and Philly and chanting "count all votes," and in Detroit, because Michigan has been declared for Harris-Biden, protestors are chanting "stop the count!" LOL! Nothing hypocritical there, eh.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dawg80
If all they are doing in Philly is "counting legally cast votes" then why have they denied GOP poll watchers from the process? (we all know why...)
Stupid-ass protestors are burning American flags in NY and Philly and chanting "count all votes," and in Detroit, because Michigan has been declared for Harris-Biden, protestors are chanting "stop the count!" LOL! Nothing hypocritical there, eh.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill...ng-sites%3famp
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bone_afide_Dawg
You really need to practice your reading comprehension skills. First, re-read what I wrote. I asked a question and pointed out what’s taking place. I didn’t draw a conclusion and for sure wasn’t whining about anything. For someone that I see post a lot on here I really thought you would’ve been more astute than what you just showed.
Your “question” assumed facts not in evidence.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
Your “question” assumed facts not in evidence.
That would be an inference, not an assumption. You guys do that a lot.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
That would be an inference, not an assumption. You guys do that a lot.
https://www.oginski-law.com/faqs/wha...nce--mean-.cfm