Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
The FBI investigation, then the Mueller investigation, and now pretty much every Congressional investigation.
Wrong on all counts.
The Mueller investigation lasted two years, he talked to everyone that worked for Trump. There was no obstruction. Not even a Clinton sympathizer like Weissman could find any crime.
What is Congress investigating besides wanting to re-litigate the Democrats Mueller report? What is their basis for investigation besides they hate Trump and they lost?
Five more years with Trump as president, that’s what you have to look forward to.
I see where Cummings has a conflict of interest. I’m sure other, probably all, members of Congress do. Let’s see everybody’s tax returns and bank records, including Trumps.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Yeah, I want to see ALL of obummer's records, the Klintons', Pelosi's, Schumer's, Nadler's, etc...Repubs get falsely accused of crimes, the Dems actually commit them.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
Wrong on counts.
This guy, an actual libertarian leaning republican actually read the report.
https://twitter.com/justinamash/stat...742256640?s=21
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, even when it’s wrong. I wonder how his family business in China is doing?
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
Wrong on all counts.
The Mueller investigation lasted two years, he talked to everyone that worked for Trump. There was no obstruction. Not even a Clinton sympathizer like Weissman could find any crime.
What is Congress investigating besides wanting to re-litigate the Democrats Mueller report? What is their basis for investigation besides they hate Trump and they lost?
Five more years with Trump as president, that’s what you have to look forward to.
I see where Cummings has a conflict of interest. I’m sure other, probably all, members of Congress do. Let’s see everybody’s tax returns and bank records, including Trumps.
Clearly you have been under a rock.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, even when it’s wrong. I wonder how his family business in China is doing?
When you can’t argue, you attack the person. Trumpism 101
Re: Presidential Election 2020
[QUOTE=johnnylightnin;1735141]When you can’t argue, you attack the person. Trumpism 101
Argue what. A team of democrats found no collusion and no obstruction. If they would have, a sealed indictment would have been issued.
No one supporting Trump thinks he’s an angel. That doesn’t make him a criminal, no matter how bad you haters want it to be.
Trumpism 101, LMAO.
Are you really that naive?
Re: Presidential Election 2020
71% of Voters Positive on Economy — Highest Rate in Almost 18 Years
quote:
American voters like today’s economy so much that the percentage who say it is “excellent” or “good” represents 71 percent. That’s the highest total number in almost 18 years, according to a Quinnipiac University National poll issued on Tuesday.
Majority state they are better off financially than they were in 2016
https://poll.qu.edu/national/release...ReleaseID=2622
This will be tough to campaign against
Re: Presidential Election 2020
[QUOTE=glm47;1735144]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
When you can’t argue, you attack the person. Trumpism 101
Argue what. A team of democrats found no collusion and no obstruction. If they would have, a sealed indictment would have been issued.
No one supporting Trump thinks he’s an angel. That doesn’t make him a criminal, no matter how bad you haters want it to be.
Trumpism 101, LMAO.
Are you really that naive?
They couldn’t do a sealed indictment because they were of the opinion they did not have the power to indict. But they also did not conclude “no obstruction.” The facts that they did find support multiple cases of obstruction.
You should read the report.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
[QUOTE=Guisslapp;1735147]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
They couldn’t do a sealed indictment because they were of the opinion they did not have the power to indict. But they also did not conclude “no obstruction.” The facts that they did find support multiple cases of obstruction.
You should read the report.
When is Mueller testifying in front of Congress?
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
When is Mueller testifying in front of Congress?
I doubt he wants to because he doesn’t want to politicize his role. A subpoena would get him there real fast.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
When you can’t argue, you attack the person. Trumpism 101
He says while attacking Trump and Trump supporters.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DawgyNWindow
He says while attacking Trump and Trump supporters.
Tu quoque
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Pointing out ad hominem is not as hominem.
Re: Presidential Election 2020
Ad...mobile won’t let me edit