We knew all along that Obama/Biden/Hillary/Pelosi/Reid were all lying their freaking ares's off.
Obamacare Website Drops 'Keep Your Doctor'...
Printable View
We knew all along that Obama/Biden/Hillary/Pelosi/Reid were all lying their freaking ares's off.
Obamacare Website Drops 'Keep Your Doctor'...
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/10/fal...es-300x100.jpg
http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/10/fal...es-300x100.jpgMEDIA'S PHONY GROPER ALLEGATIONS FALLING LIKE DOMINOES
Common Democrat tactic used to slander, destroy opponents unravels
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/#wqsxk35qISMspvo8.99
MEDIA'S PHONY GROPER ALLEGATIONS FALLING LIKE DOMINOES
Common Democrat tactic used to slander, destroy opponents unravels
Published: 9 hours ago(Gateway Pundit) The Democrat-media complex carpet bombed Donald Trump with several alleged groping stories this week from several women.
The media clearly did not fact check these stories. They ran the stories no matter how farfetched they were. It is clear from the number of stories dropped in the last week that this was a coordinated effort, probably from inside the Hillary Clinton campaign. The goal was not to present facts to the public. Their goal was to destroy Donald Trump.
In 2008 the Democrat media hit Republican John McCain with similar allegations. Vicki Iseman, the woman named in the hit piece, settled with The New York Times after the election.
So, it is clear that this is a commonly used tactic by Democrats – use the media to slander and destroy their opposition before the election.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/medias-ph...q2hoLO3Y10R.99
FIREARMS EXPERT TO HILLARY: HELLER CASE WASN'T ABOUT 'TODDLERS'
Gun Owners of America chief stunned by candidate's claim
Gun rights advocates and other experts are firing back at Hillary Clinton’s assertion in Wednesday’s presidential debate that she opposed the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision on gun rights because the court failed to protect toddlers from getting access to firearms.
The issue was raised early in the debate as part of a wider discussion on how Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump view the Supreme Court. Moderator Chris Wallace asked pointed questions of both candidates on the Second Amendment, and he specifically asked Clinton about why she was critical of the 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller.
“Secretary Clinton, you said last year, let me quote, ‘The Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment.’ And now, in fact, in the 2008 Heller case, the court ruled that there is a constitutional right to bear arms, but a right that is reasonably limited. Those were the words of the Judge Antonin Scalia who wrote the decision. What’s wrong with that?” asked Wallace.
After stating she respected the right of individuals to own firearms, Clinton addressed the Heller decision.
“You mentioned the Heller decision. And what I was saying that you referenced, Chris, was that I disagreed with the way the court applied the Second Amendment in that case, because what the District of Columbia was trying to do was to protect toddlers from guns and so they wanted people with guns to safely store them,” said Clinton.
Gun Owners of America Executive Director Larry Pratt was stunned by that answer.
The biblical mandate for armed self-defense – especially in church! Get “Shooting Back” today!
“That was pretty surprising to me but then Hillary Clinton is kind of known for saying lots of things that are surprising to those who have an idea of what the truth actually is,” said Pratt.
He says nothing in the Heller case dealt with toddlers.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/firearms-...HKfcDsAhyWI.99
If only we could play back statements made by all politicians at key moments. Hillary said she respects gun ownership, so when she tried to abolish it, we should just play that back and tell her she can't mess with the second amendment. Words can be held against you in friendships, marriages, and in court. But almost never in poilitics.
Why Must Democrats Tell Lie and Cheat?
And lie about anything and everything.
Report: Woman who accused Trump
of rape 'made it all up'
Donald's 'name had been inserted into this. He was not involved whatsoever'
It was supposed to be an explosive scandal that dealt a knock-out blow to GOP nominee Donald Trump’s presidential aspirations just days before Election Day: A woman was set to go public with her claim that Trump and a billionaire pedophile raped her when she was just 13.
The woman, who sued Trump under the name Katie Johnson on April 26, claimed he raped her at a 1994 sex party hosted by billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Johnson said she was treated as a “sex slave” who was subjected to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.
The big problem?
Johnson reportedly “made it all up.”
That’s according to a new investigation by the Daily Mail.
“[T]he DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true,” the Mail reported.
Johnson was all set to reveal her true identity at a Nov. 2 press conference, but she abruptly canceled, claiming she was “too afraid” to go public due to “threats” against her.
Even so, left-leaning media outlets went wild with the accusations. The Huffington Post asked, “Donald Trump is accused of raping a 13-year-old. Why haven’t the media covered it?”
Trump’s legal team called Johnson’s allegations “disgusting at the highest level” and said it was a “hoax” intended to “solicit media attention or, perhaps … simply politically motivated.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/report-wo...gF1d1YWxXpw.99
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/#fj4JIhmWW1CiCl3z.99
The low we have reached as a society is depressing. Most likely we have been there a while, but media coverage has made it more evident.
Democrats lie because they know they can get away with it!!
I guess it's way over due to get this thread going again.
http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/image...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/image...post-right.png
Worth repeating here as well. And BTW, this topic thread was also discussed on the old Delphi forum during Clinton's rise with his and Ted Turner's CNN network.
It was and is all bogus Guisslap! Just the "deep state" crying and lying socialist titty babies wishing they could harm and impeach Trump before he can appoint SC Judges; derail the socialist Soros, Hillary, Kerry and Obama's evil and anti-American agendas.
CNN deletes, retracts story linking Trump and Russia...
Dems push leaders to stop talking about it!
Well, well, well!!
3 CNN Staffers Resign Over 'Russia' Story...
“CNN has accepted the resignation of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” a network spokesperson says
Itay Hod | June 26, 2017 @ 3:57 PMhttps://www.thewrap.com/wp-content/u...ogo-140915.jpg
Three CNN employees have handed in their resignation over a retracted story linking President Trump to Russia, the network announced Monday.
Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN.
“In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignation of the employees involved in the story’s publication,” a network spokesperson said in a statement Monday.
On Thursday, CNN investigative reporter Thomas Frank published a report involving an investigation of a Russian investment fund with potential ties to several associates of President Donald Trump.
CNN are lying bastages.
New 'investigative' unit rocked...
Three CNN journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted.
Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN.
"In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignations of the employees involved in the story's publication," a spokesman said Monday evening.
An internal investigation by CNN management found that some standard editorial processes were not followed when the article was published, people briefed on the results of the investigation said.
The story, which reported that Congress was investigating a "Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials," cited a single anonymous source.
These types of stories are typically reviewed by several departments within CNN -- including fact-checkers, journalism standards experts and lawyers -- before publication.
This breakdown in editorial workflow disturbed the CNN executives who learned about it.
Secret FBI memos suggest Russia-Flynn probe was political payback...