President Trump

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brtransplant

I think we're about to see just how badly the mainstream media is in the tank for the deep state. The crimes committed by Hillary, Comey, McCabe, Ohr, Strzok, Page, Brennan, and all the others involved are about to be totally exposed. Although the mainstream media will do everything it can to minimize those crimes, it will be obvious to everyone just how corrupt the DC deep state establishment is. If we don't root out this corruption and send these criminals to prison, this nation won't survive as a free nation. Our very liberty is at stake here.

---

Amen!

MAGA!

JOBLESS RECORD LOW
STOCKS RECORD HIGH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS

MAGA!

JOBLESS RECORD LOW
STOCKS RECORD HIGH

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS

MAGA!

JOBLESS RECORD LOW
STOCKS RECORD HIGH

---

Obama did this.

IMHO, the latest Gallup poll shows Liberal Dems are over playing their hand per Trump, his SC nomination, dismissing Trump's successes and the real "deep state" issues that exist the past few months.

Republican Party Favorability Highest in Seven Years

Republican Party Favorability Highest in Seven Years

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Forty-five percent of Americans now have a favorable view of the Republican Party, a nine-point gain from last September's 36%. It is the party's most positive image since it registered 47% in January 2011, shortly after taking control of the House in the 2010 midterm elections. Forty-four percent give the Democratic Party a favorable rating.

https://content.gallup.com/origin/g...roduction/Cms/POLL/qscao71jtkgpomgpu7qc9w.png

The correlation between racism and sexism and Trump support was greater than that for economic dissatisfaction in 2016. Interesting.

http://people.umass.edu/schaffne/sch...conference.pdf

(See graphs on bottom of page 16)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

The correlation between racism and sexism and Trump support was greater than that for economic dissatisfaction in 2016. Interesting.

http://people.umass.edu/schaffne/sch...conference.pdf

(See graphs on bottom of page 16)

---

LMAO....UMass Amherst.

Fox guarding the hen house.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glm47

LMAO....UMass Amherst.

Fox guarding the hen house.

---

Do you disagree with their data or their analysis?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Do you disagree with their data or their analysis?

---

Why read the report when you can make an ad hominem rebuttal with much less effort?

Why read the report when it is total bullshit?

I skimmed it...every paragraph begins with

"It is likely..."

"It is possible that..."

In other words, all conjecture based on an anti-Trump bias.

Next!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

Why read the report when it is total bullshit?

I skimmed it...every paragraph begins with

"It is likely..."

"It is possible that..."

In other words, all conjecture based on an anti-Trump bias.

Next!

---

What were your conclusions from the data presented in the charts on page 16?

Seems like the questions that determined if you are racist or sexists are measures of how much you identify with identity politics which would be a pretty good predictor of political affiliation.

"predicted probability" :laugh:

What is the direct correlation?

Researcher: Unknown, but we have calculated a probability based on our preconceived notions and carefully selected factors.

What is the probability then?

Researcher: Well our study fails to meet the standards of a real scientific study, so the variation is too great. But! based on our bias, we can "predict" what that "probability" might be. Actually, what we hope it would be.

Next!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

The correlation between racism and sexism and Trump support was greater than that for economic dissatisfaction in 2016. Interesting.

http://people.umass.edu/schaffne/sch...conference.pdf

(See graphs on bottom of page 16)

---

Says the school who's enrollment includes only 3.4% Blacks. :laugh:

https://www.umass.edu/oir/sites/defa.../FS_rac_01.pdf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

"predicted probability" :laugh:

What is the direct correlation?

Researcher: Unknown, but we have calculated a probability based on our preconceived notions and carefully selected factors.

What is the probability then?

Researcher: Well our study fails to meet the standards of a real scientific study, so the variation is too great. But! based on our bias, we can "predict" what that "probability" might be. Actually, what we hope it would be.

Next!

---

Well, if you read the article, it says that, if you held all other variables constant (including partisanship and view of economic satisfaction), one is 30 percent more likely to support Trump if they were racist OR sexist. That number seems too low to me, but given that these views tend to cluster, being a dissatisfied sexist racist, Trump would be the near guaranteed vote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Do you disagree with their data or their analysis?

---

Yes, without even looking at it.