CUSA All-Conference Team Snubs

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Champ967

Screw that. I want Tech to be playing GOOD teams with GOOD players.

Questioning the strength of our opponents (and their players) only serves to undermine both Tech's wins and losses.

Are you one of the ones who chant "OVER-RATED" whenever Tech takes the lead angainst a top team? (Like when we pulled ahead of a ranked Fresno in 2004?). Because tearing down the athleticism of the other team's players is, from my perspective, really no different.

---

HD caught you in the PMS and now you are going off on everybody!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddawg

HD caught you in the PMS and now you are going off on everybody!

---

Since that has nothing to do with the conversation, I'm guessing it was some kind of weird typo.

I think what you meant to say was "Thanks Champ, that's a salient point. I may have to rethink my position on this. "

Or maybe "Your point is well-taken, but my position remains unchanged."

No. I figure if either one of them were as good as adverstised we would not have been able to stop them.

Turns out that Cato can throw a mean slant route and has pretty good feet.

Doughty is scared to death back there and is only a good QB when he has ALL DAY to throw the ball.

It's a discussion. I'm not going to allow you to shout me down the way you did HD.:icon_razz:

maddawg, that's like saying Rattay sucked because USC shut him down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddawg

No. I figure if either one of them were as good as adverstised we would not have been able to stop them.

---

Your point is well taken, but my position remains unchanged. (preemptive twss)

I think both QBs, as well as Tech's defense, are better than you're giving them credit for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T1

maddawg, that's like saying Rattay sucked because USC shut him down.

---

USC didn't shut him down. Our receivers shut him down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddawg

USC didn't shut him down. Our receivers shut him down.

---

:laugh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T1

:laugh:

---

He had over 400 yards and 3 TDs. More drops in crucial situations than we'd had all year. Bicknell never was much on curfews.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddawg

USC didn't shut him down. Our receivers shut him down.

---

That's my memory. Lots of dropped passes.

Tech didn't shut down Doughty, WKU's OL did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T1

Tech didn't shut down Doughty, WKU's OL did.

---

Flawed logic as usual. Your logic says that USC's game plan was to get Tech's hung over receivers to drop passes.

Diaz had a game plan that worked against both QBs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddawg

Flawed logic as usual. Your logic says that USC's game plan was to get Tech's hung over receivers to drop passes.

Diaz had a game plan that worked against both QBs.

---

My logic is sound. You said he is good if he has time. He didn't have time against Tech. Who gets the blame for that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by T1

My logic is sound. You said he is good if he has time. He didn't have time against Tech. Who gets the blame for that?

---

Diaz gets credit for finding the weakness.

USC didn't find a weakness to exploit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddawg

Diaz gets credit for finding the weakness.

USC didn't find a weakness to exploit.

---

OK... makes sense. I still think he's good though, we just have Manny and no one else does. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by maddawg

It's a discussion. I'm not going to allow you to shout me down the way you did HD.:icon_razz:

---

Riiiiight..........:icon_roll: