WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-11-2010, 05:26 PM
inudesu

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geaux Dawgs

We could win this WAC for 5 years and IMO would have ZERO effect on whether we get into CUSA or not

We could win the SB for 5 years and IMO would have ZERO effect on whether we get into CUSA or not.
11-11-2010, 05:29 PM
Geaux Dawgs

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by inudesu

We could win the SB for 5 years and IMO would have ZERO effect on whether we get into CUSA or not.

I agree here too......Not saying I want to be in the Belt, just saying the new WAC SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hell, we lost to Seattle in basketball a year or two ago in some early tournament....honestly had never heard of them.......and now they are likely going to be in our conference.

We have a better chance getting into the MWC than CUSA
11-11-2010, 05:30 PM
buck_dawg_gold

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geaux Dawgs

I agree here too......Not saying I want to be in the Belt, just saying the new WAC SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hell, we lost to Seattle in basketball a year or two ago in some early tournament....honestly had never heard of them.......and now they are likely going to be in our conference.

We have a better chance getting into the MWC than CUSA

iTS NOT ALWAYS ALL ABOUT FOOTBALL... THE NEW WAC IS STILL STRONGER IN OTHER SPORTS THAN THE SUNBELT....
11-11-2010, 05:32 PM
parisdog

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by buck_dawg_gold

iTS NOT ALWAYS ALL ABOUT FOOTBALL... THE NEW WAC IS STILL STRONGER IN OTHER SPORTS THAN THE SUNBELT....

I don't know how you can say that.
11-11-2010, 05:33 PM
Geaux Dawgs

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by buck_dawg_gold

iTS NOT ALWAYS ALL ABOUT FOOTBALL... THE NEW WAC IS STILL STRONGER IN OTHER SPORTS THAN THE SUNBELT....

Ok, I will bite.....what other than men's basketball?

DU has a better hockey team than the Belt teams....I give you that one.
11-11-2010, 05:34 PM
inudesu

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geaux Dawgs

Ok, I will bite.....what other than men's basketball?

DU has a better hockey team than the Belt teams....I give you that one.

Hawaii is a v-ball power.

But basketball and football are the only ones that matter. And I think the WAC edges the SB in both even with the new additions.
11-11-2010, 05:35 PM
buck_dawg_gold

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geaux Dawgs

Ok, I will bite.....what other than men's basketball?

DU has a better hockey team than the Belt teams....I give you that one.

Football and basketball are the sports were you can generate the most revenue (Bowl Games, Tournaments) what other sports should i be talking about...?
11-11-2010, 05:36 PM
bluecrew

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by buck_dawg_gold

iTS NOT ALWAYS ALL ABOUT FOOTBALL... THE NEW WAC IS STILL STRONGER IN OTHER SPORTS THAN THE SUNBELT....

We dont have fresno or nevada for baseball. And the last few years they have had more 2 bid teams into the ncaa tournament than current wac...so disagree
11-11-2010, 05:38 PM
Geaux Dawgs

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by inudesu

Hawaii is a v-ball power.

But basketball and football are the only ones that matter. And I think the WAC edges the SB in both even with the new additions.

Women's volleyball...........wow, I feel much better

I totally agree the NEWAC is better in men's basketball. Football......barely.
11-11-2010, 05:39 PM
Geaux Dawgs

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by buck_dawg_gold

Football and basketball are the sports were you can generate the most revenue (Bowl Games, Tournaments) what other sports should i be talking about...?

Again, I agree with men's basketball........ We are about to be a 1 bowl league in foots though.
11-11-2010, 05:40 PM
inudesu

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geaux Dawgs

Again, I agree with men's basketball........ We are about to be a 1 bowl league in foots though.

"About to be" is the key here. We've got multiple bowls for the next, what? Three years?
11-11-2010, 05:41 PM
inudesu

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geaux Dawgs

Women's volleyball...........wow, I feel much better

I totally agree the NEWAC is better in men's basketball. Football......barely.

I was just giving an example. The only ones that matter are football and basketball. But you asked for examples and I gave you one.
11-11-2010, 05:42 PM
Geaux Dawgs

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by inudesu

"About to be" is the key here. We've got multiple bowls for the next, what? Three years?

You really think the Humanitarian bowl remains?? New Mexico Bowl already axed the Wac after 2011.

I meant about to be as in the next couple of years, not tomorrow.
11-11-2010, 05:42 PM
inudesu

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluecrew

We dont have fresno or nevada for baseball. And the last few years they have had more 2 bid teams into the ncaa tournament than current wac...so disagree

Do you think the SB is better than the new WAC in basketball? Overall? Top-to-Bottom? At the top? In RPI/Sagarin style rankings? In Top 25 teams?
11-11-2010, 05:44 PM
inudesu

Re: WAC deal done to add UTSA, TSU and DU

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geaux Dawgs

You really think the Humanitarian bowl remains?? New Mexico Bowl already axed the Wac after 2011.

I meant about to be as in the next couple of years, not tomorrow.

Where is the H-Bowl going to go? If they drop one side of their current agreements for a MWC tie-in, it'll be the MAC.

You think they're suddenly going to start hosting the SEC and PAC-10?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.