Printable View
The Top Ten
TBA: Alabama
TBA: Ohio St
TBA: Oregon
TBA: Stanford
No. 5: South Carolina
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/52bb...SI-6897424.jpg
Who is No. 4? This team's season-opening depth chart features 11 seniors, eight juniors and only three sophomores.
No. 6: Georgia
No. 7: Texas A&M
No. 8: Florida St
No. 9: Boise St
No. 10: Clemson
The Top Ten
TBA: Alabama
TBA: Ohio St
TBA: Stanford
No. 4: Oregon
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/ad5f...SI-7240227.jpg
Who is No. 3? This team's coach has the 30th-most wins in NCAA history among coaches whose last name starts with the same letter as the coach in question. (So if we were hinting to Washington State and Mike Leach, it would be coaches whose last name starts with the letter 'L.')
No. 5: South Carolina
No. 6: Georgia
No. 7: Texas A&M
No. 8: Florida St
No. 9: Boise St
No. 10: Clemson
The Top Ten
TBA: Alabama
TBA: Stanford
No. 3: Ohio St
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/c234...SI-7391832.jpg
Who is No. 2? This team held 12 opponents to less than 25 points in 2012.
No. 4: Oregon
No. 5: South Carolina
No. 6: Georgia
No. 7: Texas A&M
No. 8: Florida St
No. 9: Boise St
No. 10: Clemson
Tulsa, the top team in C-USA just got demolished by Bowling Green. LOL
Yeah, bad rankings. That should make you question the unusually high rankings of the Sunbelt teams. Who was that team the Sunbelt's newest member played last night? NAIA?Quote:
Originally Posted by supermel311
Actually we refer to them as future AAC member...Quote:
Originally Posted by supermel311
To be fair, like the rest of the Sunbelt, South Alabama is fresh out of FCS and not much better.Quote:
Originally Posted by maddawg
The Top Ten
No. 1: Alabama
No. 2: Stanford
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/6f41...SI-7221335.jpg
Who is No. 1? The only team in the FBS to not get previewed in 2013 by Paul Myerberg of USA TODAY Sports.
No. 3: Ohio St
No. 4: Oregon
No. 5: South Carolina
No. 6: Georgia
No. 7: Texas A&M
No. 8: Florida St
No. 9: Boise St
No. 10: Clemson
I believe South Alabama might have a few more scholarships available and they might also have transfers that didn't have to sit out a year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Dawg
...to be fair.:icon_wink:
Final conference rankings
$EC--14/39.9
Big 12--10/44.1
Big Ten--12/47.3
Pac 12--12/49.2
ACC--14/54.9
AAC--10/69.2
MWC--12/73.2
Indy--6/75.8
MAC--13/78.9
C-USA--14/86.2
Sun Belt--8/86.5
Top 70 teams by conference
$EC--12
Pac 12--9
ACC--8
Big 12--8
Big Ten--8
MWC--6
MAC--5
AAC--4
C-USA--4
Indy--3
Sun Belt--3
Drop Tulsa 20 spots and that is still ahead of the Sun Belt's #1.Quote:
Originally Posted by supermel311
C-USA is ahead of the Sun Belt at EVERY position comparing 1-8. And C-USA teams 9-14 are ahead of Sun Belt teams 7 and 8.
I wish you guys would quit worring about the Belch. I want to be compared to the Big-12 or at least the Mt. West. We ain't there yet, but look ahead not backwards.Quote:
Originally Posted by RealityCheck
I'm not worrying about the Belch...just providing facts to our resident Belch flamer.:furious3::rifle:Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaver-Dog