You’re wrong again Guisslapp.
Of course the media isn’t giving it any play.
The Centers for Disease Control reports Covid-19 survival rates exceeding 99.9% for age 0-49 and 99.5% for age 50-69
Printable View
You’re wrong again Guisslapp.
Of course the media isn’t giving it any play.
The Centers for Disease Control reports Covid-19 survival rates exceeding 99.9% for age 0-49 and 99.5% for age 50-69
No they don’t.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Well...no matter what you believe or which sources you think are reliable, it is beyond dispute that SARS virus strains are more lethal than the run-of-the-mill influenza virus strains. They attack the body differently, for one reason. And due to numerous flu epidemics many people have built-up immunity and we have a flu vaccine that actually works for the over-whelming % of the population AND! we have proven treatments for the flu as well. Not so for the SARS strains.
This 2019 China virus pandemic is a SARS strain. If the Chicoms had cooperated, and if the WHO hadn't lied and tried to cover-up for the Chicoms, the world would have learned a lot sooner we were dealing with a SARS virus. By the time that was confirmed it had already spread to every continent and gotten a foothold across the world. And, as is the nature of viruses, this particular strain has its own unique characteristics. There is no and NEVER WILL BE a one-size-fits-all prescription to battle any virus, and especially not a SARS strain.
Much like 9/11 forever changed the world we live in...think airport security...so too has the 2019 China virus changed our lives. I foresee quicker and more draconian reactions to news of possible virus outbreaks across the world. And, unfortunately, here in the US as well.
A friend just posted that his father-in-law, age 78, has passed away and he says it is China virus caused, or related. He's one of those "hide under the covers"-types who posts screaming rebukes on social media about WEAR YOUR MASKS! you selfish pieces of shit! I just responded to his post "Sorry for your loss," and won't reply to the rest of his libtard rants...his father-in-law's passing is Trump's fault, apparently. Funny thing...I didn't know Trump was ever in Many, Louisiana. And the obvious question to ask if, "Why didn't YOU keep your father-in-law safe from the virus, since you are such an expert on it?"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile..../idUSKBN26P0DTQuote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Quote:
Most Americans continue to be deeply worried about the virus, and the poll found that 65%, including 9 in 10 registered Democrats and 5 in 10 registered Republicans, agreed that "if President Trump had taken coronavirus more seriously, he probably would not have been infected."
Quote:
Most Americans continue to be deeply worried about the virus, and the poll found that 65%, including 9 in 10 registered Democrats and 5 in 10 registered Republicans, agreed that "if President Trump had taken coronavirus more seriously, he probably would not have been infected."
You quote a poll? This is beyond stupid.
But it's the narrative your folks have set up for you so you dutifully follow.
It is beyond stupid. Percentages should be MUCH higher...they are in the ABC poll.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
You all act as if you catch COVID that it is a death sentence. In the US the survival rate is at least 95% and that is for all persons regardless of age.
Based upon John Hopkins website the mortality rate for Covid in US is 2.8% per 100,000 people. Based upon CDC website the mortality rate for Influenza is 6.5% per 100,000 people. Seems like catching the flu is more lethal than Covid
flu.htm
https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
That doesn't make sense. First, why cite a % per 100,000 persons? It would be the same % for any number of people. For instance, the 2009-10 Mexican Flu infected 61 million Americans, 6.5% of that is right at 4 million. The revised death totals for that epidemic is 18,500...that's a lot less than 4 million.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Yes they did and you’ve lost your bases for your entire argument as always.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Obviously it is not. Your case fatality rate calculation for the flu is not even close.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
And the Johns Hopkins death rate for COVID is not really a case fatality rate or infection fatality rate. It is closer to the former, but still...
Anything ABC reports is pure propaganda. They're so obviously biased that only an idiot would ever believe anything coming from that network.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
So, Donald Trump, a fat, stupid 74-yr-old survived the China virus...the most lethal disease in world history...amazing.
... but he did it with drugs not available to everyone else.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
The president received remdesivir, an antiviral medication with limited availability. Developing countries pay $2,340 per patient for a five-day course of treatment. For Americans the cost is $3,120 per five-day course.
Plus Regeneron (currently only enough supply to treat 50k patients) and steroids.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg