Printable View
Even that moron Chuckie Todd on CNN had to admit they had gotten the story of "clearing the area near the church for a photo op" all wrong. Much to his chagrin, but he did.
Now...Goosey....even when the ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD agrees on something, you hold to the same old TDS-invoked lies of "Orange Man Bad!"
You should seek help.
Doesn’t surprise me that CNN would admit when they were wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
Don't be so fast to give them a pass. For instance, when that event happened the WH told the truth and FOX News nailed it perfectly. But the lamestream media, and you, didn't want to know the truth, you just wanted to stick to the agenda-driven narrative of "Orange Man Bad!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Now, a truly intelligent person would ask themselves, well, if CNN et al got this story wrong, what else have they gotten wrong (i.e. lied about)? Some of us have been saying you have been duped by the fake news outlets (CNN et al), but you just double down with that nonsense about FOX viewers knowing less than those who watch no news at all. Which, even IF FOX was as guilty as the lib media of half-truths, viewers are still exposed to tons of factual news. Of course, FOX is not guilty of the level of "fake news" CNN et al are.
Open your eyes, Goosey. Join the rest of us in the world of reality.
Earlier in the week, White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany told reporters it was Barr who made the decision to push back the security perimeter outside the White House on Monday morning. McEnany said that when Barr arrived at Lafayette Park later that day to survey the security situation, he was surprised to see that action had not yet been taken.
“So he said that we needed to get going with moving that perimeter. He told the officers that out there,” McEnany said Wednesday.
Trump wanted to take credit for it.
There is a reason people believed that Trump ordered the early enforcement of the curfew for a photo op.
Barr requested it and then Trump sent his minions out there to reinforce the message that Barr ordered it.
Hopeless....:icon_roll:
Do you not acknowledge that Kayleigh said what she said and Barr said what he said?Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
I have no problem acknowledging what the IG said.
LMAO!Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
You were wrong yet again. What a sucker.
I can handle being wrong now and again, especially over something of no consequence. Looking back, my mistake was trusting what the Trump administration said about the event. I should have known better. My bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by glm47
The 2022 Mid-terms...
Primaries are taking place across the country and in recent GOP races Trump's endorsed candidates are 1 and 1, lost in Texas, won in Ohio. MSNBC made a big deal of "Trump's loss" in Texas the other day, nothing so far on "his win" in Ohio. I placed those in quotes because are these congressional primaries really about Trump, or are they more to do with the individual candidates? These are GOP primaries, GOP vs. GOP candidates. All politics is local, they say. That said, I do think someone like Trump, a dynamic but polarizing personality, can have (will have) influence on some of the races, given all else being equal. In other words, in those districts were GOP voters are truly undecided and could support either (any) candidate, who Trump endorses could sway the vote, one way or the other. But in most of the races it will be the quality of the individual candidates themselves who will influence the results.
Of course the national lib media wants to make this about Trump...since they are terrified of him and his pro-American policies. They want (hope) to discredit him and end his influence on national politics. There are some (many?) on the right that want to see that happen too...those RINO Swampers.
Personally, I don't think Trump wields as much influence on voters as some believe. Now, candidates who also endorse America and Americans and effectively articulate many of the same positions as Trump does will attract "Trumpsters" but not because of Trump, but because those same voters support(ed) Trump for his policies, not because of him personally. That is a point the left has never understood, and still don't get it.
Great post!Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
I refused to vote for him the first go around because of his personality. The second time, once I saw what he was doing FOR America, I stood in line for almost two hours wearing a mask to cast my vote for him and for the USA. I know it's hard to believe I had to wait in that kind of line without being some sort of disenfranchised minority, but it happens to us melanin-deficient folks as well. Nobody offered me water or food either!
The only people for whom this is all about Trump are the lefties who are Godless and look upon the government as the supreme being. The rest of us are a little better grounded than they are.
When choosing between Trump or what we have now, that's an easy choice. Biden has pretty advanced dementia, and everyone knows it, and his VP is one of the most incompetent people to ever hold a public office. It's embarrassing that those two are representing the US.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
She is more racist than Biden to boot. Traditional liberals can’t be happy with either of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by SicemDawgz
Those people are like the Incas or Mayans... they don't exist anymore..Quote:
Originally Posted by techman05
Trump held a rally in Alabama and there were many thousands waiting in line to get in. The line stretched down a road, maybe a mile+. You could take the people in any 100 yards of that line and they would out-number the largest rally attendance Biden has ever had. But, oh yes, Biden garnered more votes....yeah, right.