Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
They really haven't impeached Trump yet. And now Pelosi and her clown court are about to be "Guilty of Obstruction".
Pelosi 'constitutionally wrong' by stalling impeachment transfer, Starr warns
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is "constitutionally wrong" in stalling the transfer of two articles of impeachment to the Senate, former Whitewater Independent Counsel Ken Starr said Saturday.
In a Bloomberg op-ed, Feldman cautioned that, in order to officially impeach the president, Pelosi must send the articles of impeachment to the Republican-led Senate. He said that while she can delay sending the articles, she cannot do so for an "indefinite" period of time.
"it's an impeachment with a footnote or with an asterisk," Starr said. "By the way, it never went over to the Senate, which I think means that it's a bit of a phony impeachment."
And in my mind the are committing bribery with foreigners people groups and most probably with the same foreign governments behind the scenes and behind Trumps back (such like John Kerry) with the below.
Dems are working to weaponize government power against adversaries
By Jason Chaffetz
Tom Homan: 2020 Dems making promises to illegals 'guaranteeing' Trump win
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TYLERTECHSAS
The "Deep State" of the corrupt FBI/CIA/Hillary/Biden, and yes it will reach to Obama, has now been proven of spying on Trump and his campaign. Period.
The IG report just said the opposite.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dawg80
Just because a fellow happens to be a boxer by profession means he couldn't have info on the Bidens' dirty dealings? Are you always this condescending toward professional athletes?
You know you were reporting fake news, right?
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
The IG report just said the opposite.
Nope as AG Barr and Durham totally rebuked and disagreed with it. So there is major smoke for the AG and John Durham to even talk about this one. ! And the new Durham Report will be devastating to the Liberals and Deep State players.
All eyes on Durham after rebuke of IG Horowitz's findings | Fox ...
https://www.foxnews.com › john-durham-michael-horowitz-findings-rebuke
Still, Horowitz's report offered several clues as to potential avenues that Durham may be pursuing. For example, Horowitz noted that the FBI omitted exculpatory ...
Barr and Durham Publicly Disagree With Horowitz Report on ...
https://www.nytimes.com › barr-durham-ig-report-russia-investigation
WASHINGTON — When the Mueller report was made public this spring, Attorney General William P. Barr seemed to try to blunt its findings, playing them down in ...
Durham rejects 'some conclusions' of Horowitz report
https://ctmirror.org › 2019/12/09 › durham-rejects-some-conclusions-of-h...
Dec 9, 2019 - Washington – Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham on Monday said he disagreed with some of the conclusions of a Justice Department ...
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Barr and Durham have already proven than they are partisan hacks part of the Trump propaganda team.
So what is there evidence that the FBI spied on Trump?
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
Barr and Durham have already proven than they are partisan hacks part of the Trump propaganda team.
So what is there evidence that the FBI spied on Trump?
So not true.
N.Y. Times: John Brennan targeted in Durham's criminal probe
Trump has accused Obama CIA director of leading 'deep state' cabal
Published December 20, 2019 at 6:32pm
U.S. Attorney John Durham is investigating John Brennan’s role in the 2016 election, calling for the former Obama CIA director's emails, call logs and other documents, according to the New York Times.
Durham is examining how the intelligence community assessed Russia’s 2016 election interference, according to three people briefed on the inquiry.
The federal prosecutor wants to find out what Brennan told other officials, including former FBI Director James B. Comey, about his and the CIA's views of the debunked Steele dossier's assertions about Russia and Trump associates.
The Times noted President Trump has accused Brennan of being part of a "deep state" cabal that tried to sabotage his campaign.
TRENDING: CNN sounds alarm: Warning lights flashing for Dems as they impeach Trump
Durham is also examining whether Brennan privately contradicted his public comments about the dossier and Russian interference, including in May 2017 testimony to Congress.
Brennan, now a CNN commentator, has accused Trump of treason, alleging he was an agent of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
But he was forced to backtrack when special counsel Robert Mueller concluded that there was no collusion with Russia by the Trump campaign.
Brennan told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" at the time: "I don't know if I received bad information, but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was."
The Washington Post reported that in August 2016, Brennan requested a meeting with President Obama after compiling claims of Russian interference in the election.
That same month, Brennan briefed then-Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid about the Steele, which was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Reid then transmitted some of the information in a letter to the FBI
more
https://www.wnd.com/2019/12/n-y-times-john-brennan-targeted-durhams-criminal-probe/
Judge gives ex-FBI agent a week in jail for spying on pro-Trump activist
Barr: Comey lying to distance himself from FBI quagmire
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
As a raw intelligence document, the Steele Dossier actually had quite a bit of information that the Mueller report corroborated.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
As a raw intelligence document, the Steele Dossier actually had quite a bit of information that the Mueller report corroborated.
:laugh: Keep grasping at PC paper straws.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TYLERTECHSAS
:laugh: Keep grasping at PC paper straws.
The purpose of this disagreement with the IG report is transparent to all but the most vapid.
Just like Trump’s efforts to influence foreign governments interfere in our elections, he is also bending our domestic agencies such as the DOJ to promote conspiracy theories aimed at helping him with re-election.
These new unethical campaign tactics are going to destroy our country. Even the Obama administration considered this improper and that is why we didn’t hear boo about the Trump investigation during the 2016 election.
You never learn. Just like how you were happy with government surveillance when it was led by Republicans and then learned that it could be abused, you are once again failing to imagine a world where these campaign tactics are used by the left.
Trump has yet to see a line he wouldn’t cross, and so far republicans are letting him do it. They are opening Pandora’s box, and I guarantee, we won’t be waiting too long for Republicans to be complaining about democrats doing the same thing.
This won’t end well.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
The purpose of this disagreement with the IG report is transparent to all but the most vapid.
Just like Trump’s efforts to influence foreign governments interfere in our elections, he is also bending our domestic agencies such as the DOJ to promote conspiracy theories aimed at helping him with re-election.
These new unethical campaign tactics are going to destroy our country. Even the Obama administration considered this improper and that is why we didn’t hear boo about the Trump investigation during the 2016 election.
You never learn. Just like how you were happy with government surveillance when it was led by Republicans and then learned that it could be abused, you are once again failing to imagine a world where these campaign tactics are used by the left.
Trump has yet to see a line he wouldn’t cross, and so far republicans are letting him do it. They are opening Pandora’s box, and I guarantee, we won’t be waiting too long for Republicans to be complaining about democrats doing the same thing.
This won’t end well.
You’ve been wrong for three years. The next four are going to be fun.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
You’ve been wrong for three years. The next four are going to be fun.
That is exactly what Russia wants you to think.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
That is exactly what Russia wants you to think.
I know. That’s what Obama and Clinton told me.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
That is exactly what Russia wants you to think.
Dude, it's the socialist soon to turn commie Hillary, Biden, Col. Sanders, Soros, John Kerry and Obama that are historically Putin's and Russia's BFF's.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TYLERTECHSAS
Dude, it's the socialist soon to turn commie Hillary, Biden, Col. Sanders, Soros, John Kerry and Obama that are historically Putin's and Russia's BFF's.
Then why did he help Trump?