President Trump

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

Supreme Court denies azzhole Jack Smith's request to rule on presidential immunity, stating they will allow the case(s) to run their course through all the lower courts. This is exactly what Trump, and his lawyers, wanted the SC to rule.

Back to square one. Of course, meantime, Colorado and a dozen other blue commie states will try to keep Trump off the ballot.

---

Good.

What about the recorded call with Trump, McDaniel, and elections officials trying to get them to withdraw their certification? What will be the fallout there?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by techman05

What about the recorded call with Trump, McDaniel, and elections officials trying to get them to withdraw their certification? What will be the fallout there?

---

fallout = more votes for Trump

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

fallout = more votes for Trump

---

I agree with that. Would just hate to see the first thing he is actually guilty of be such a seemingly small thing and end up keeping him out of office.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAcEK85Gxjo

Michigan Supreme Court rejects effort to remove Trump from the state's primary ballot. Good!

After Trump is elected he needs to reject Colorado...no federal funds for them.

Colorado reverses itself and is now allowing Trump on the ballot, provided the US Supreme Court doesn't rule that the Colorado SC was right. And the absolute drop-dead date is January 5, 2024 that the USSC has to rule, which they won't.

This should kill the attempts in the other 10+ states contemplating removing Trump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

Colorado reverses itself and is now allowing Trump on the ballot, provided the US Supreme Court doesn't rule that the Colorado SC was right. And the absolute drop-dead date is January 5, 2024 that the USSC has to rule, which they won't.

This should kill the attempts in the other 10+ states contemplating removing Trump.

---

Well, this didn't stop Maine's commie SOS from removing Trump from the ballot, pending a SC decision.

"a shepherd to mankind who won't ever leave nor forsake them..." -- from the new trump ad.

you trump fans like that blasphemy? is he your messiah, your christ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arkansasbob

"a shepherd to mankind who won't ever leave nor forsake them..." -- from the new trump ad.

you trump fans like that blasphemy? is he your messiah, your christ?

---

Well, he's not Satan like the ones you support.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

Well, he's not Satan like the ones you support.

---

so you're cool with it.
which ones do you think i support? are you saying that the entire republican field is satan?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arkansasbob

"a shepherd to mankind who won't ever leave nor forsake them..." -- from the new trump ad.

---

What scripture is he quoting?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PawDawg

What scripture is he quoting?

---

i don't know of any that match that directly, but it is obviously combining some scriptural motifs of Christ. is there some other reasonable way to take it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arkansasbob

so you're cool with it.
which ones do you think i support? are you saying that the entire republican field is satan?

---

You are anti-Trump which makes you pro-commie, and that makes you in league with the devil. Don't blame me, it's the choice you have made.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by arkansasbob

i don't know of any that match that directly, but it is obviously combining some scriptural motifs of Christ. is there some other reasonable way to take it?

---

Reasonable way? You have zero reasoning skills. You are assuming only idiots vote for Trump, therefore they must be impressed by the use of "scriptural motifs".

Here's an idea...break down the "scriptual motifs". Shepherd (he is a leader) Forsake (he will stand by his followers) If you want to throw "mankind" in there you should be fine since you seem to be all about globalism.

No inference in his "slogan" at all.