Have never watched them.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Printable View
Have never watched them.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
I don't believe that for a second.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Wouldn’t recognize them even if I saw them in the flesh. Wouldn’t recognize their voice either.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
How about this one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Weeping Rodman blasts Obama, says Kim was willing to talk 5 years ago
Weeping Dennis Rodman praises Trump's meeting with friend Kim Jong Un, blasts Obama for ignoring him
http://a57.foxnews.com/hp.foxnews.co....jpg?tl=1&ve=1'BRUSHED ME OFF'
Weeping Rodman blasts Obama, says Kim was willing to talk 5 years ago
Remember when Republicans opposed the idea of Obama talking to N. Korea?Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I admit, I don't remember Republicans opposing obummer talking with NK. When and who specifically (which Repubs) opposed it?
Now....from my perspective, I agree obummer shouldn't have talked with NK, or anyone for that matter. obummer was (still is) a walking cluster-f**k. He is nothing but a puppet for the George Soros evil empire. So, in that regard, I wouldn't want obummer representing the US in any talks.
It is good we waited until we had a real POTUS again.
Right now...6:57 AM on June 12, CNN is making a big deal out of WH staffers taping together torn up documents. The piece is designed to make it look like President Trump, and his staff, are destroying incriminating evidence. Typical of CNN, and why it is a joke of network.
CNN says they will follow this story.... Of course they will! That way they won't have to waste air time on real news.
Obama was/is inept. No negotiation skills AT ALL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Read an article on that the other day. Funny that you thought they were suggesting he was hiding incriminating evidence. Probably influenced by your over indulgence in the propaganda cycle of the right where every action involves criminal motivation.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
My take was that they weren’t suggesting something sinister at all. Rather the point was that this guy is too incompetent to understand basic rules and procedures.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aGcteItQWqcQuote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
October 26, 2008. Sean Hannity states, when indentifying his Number 2 reason (out of 10) for not voting for Obama:
“One of the most disturbing displays of Obama's lack of foreign policy expertise came during last year's YouTube debate," "The junior senator from Illinois gave what many called a naive answer for a question from the audience about whether he would meet with the leaders of Syria, Venezuela, Cuba or North Korea without preconditions."
obummer used an EO to open up our relations with Cuba. Personally, I have never understood why we treated Cuba differently than other commie dictatorships.
In general, I favor talking with anyone and everyone....including adversaries. You've heard the adage: Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. So, I don't have a problem talking with anyone. Certainly, again in general, we should expect our POTUS to hold talks with other world leaders. Far better for them to be talking vs. gearing up our military for a war.
As for obummer….he is bad news. So, I am glad he never engaged in talks with NK. We saw how he told the world how wrong, how "bad," the US is. Trump takes the exact opposite view, "America First."
He refused. Remember Obama wasn't a leader, he was a follower from behind.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
And the silent treatment doesn't work for countries and their leaders. Michelle must treat Hussein Barrack with the silent treatment. It hardly works with kindergarten kids.
That is fine, as long you recognize that the right wing (in general) opposed the idea of talking to dictators before Trump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
This is because the country couldn't trust Obama to play hardball with the world leaders. He is a pushover at negotiating and always played to "lead from behind". Nobody respected him across the world for this reason and would bulldoze him under (Iran). His only tactic was going silent or trying to ignore (never had the GOP leadership in the WH for years). He was a terrible listener and really didn't care because he thought he was the smartest man in the room. The fatal mistake every time on his part. The best he could do was try to undermine people, like a H.S. girl, and the Constitution by lying or deceit or just his "power of position" (like the Deep State). He was a terrible President and terrible negotiator and will got down in real history books as such.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
That is revisionism. This was the conservative position in the 2008 election, well before you got on this crazy deep state conspiracy theory, when Obama supported engaging these countries.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS