We will see how good their sources are soon enough.
Printable View
Doesn't matter. Non-circulated memos from someone that was fired and has a personal axe to grind are probably not the most reliable evidence to base a case upon. Supposedly these memos were based on conversations that were had many months ago and were of little concern UNTIL he got his panties in a bunch from being fired. His ego is as big as Trump's.
Yep, and he did not share this information with anybody, meaning he did not think anything unlawful was being done. To suddenly freak out about something that happened 6 months ago after being fired smacks of revenge.
Of course, he could just say he has PTSD from the Obama years where the laws they decided to enforce changed daily (usually in the favor of lawlessness).
Except the people he showed the memo to, right?
Reading the tea leaves, he wanted to keep that info away from the folks doing the counterintelligence investigation so as not to influence them.
Also, reading the tea leaves, Comey appears to have initially believed that Trump didn't understand what was appropriate for interfacing with the FBI, but hoped he could steer him in the right direction - kind of an educational opportunity.
If that is so, it is not hard to see how he would view his firing and other public comments Trump made after the firing in a new light - thus, further informing the previous comments and behavior he witnessed.
You guys are really grasping at straws when you say that the fact he didn't blow the whole thing up the first time Trump misstepped with him discredits him. No one, but the FoxNews faithful, is going to see it that way.
It will just make it harder. Fortunately, the majority of Americans support the Paris Climate Agreement and the utility industry also understands the threat from CO2 pollution. Notice that Exxon will have to start reporting its impact on climate change because one of its largest shareholders, Black Rock, wanted it. Just another reason, if Trump quits the Paris agreement, why is re-election will be more difficult for him.
I like our ability to compete under the Paris agreement. It sure would be nice to have a seat at that table to make sure that the "rules" are not written in a way that disadvantage when we inevitably get on board (post Trump).
Hardly. But when you are addressing a global issue, you should work together with other partners. What is silly is for there not to be an agreement and then the developed countries make GHG reductions while the developing countries more than make up for reductions.