Printable View
The only argument I saw about statistical anomalies essentially argued as I said - that it was statistically unlikely that Biden would get a big dump of ballots skewing his favor from a city when all the other ballot dumps were smaller and favoring Trump. That is obviously a stupid argument, because cities always have more votes and always skew more Democrat than rural areas. You got something better than that?Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
The critical states all stopped the election counting of ballots at midnight, with Trump leading in them all, only to see how many Biden ballots they would have to stuff and have Dominion computers fraudulently slam in order for the Socialist Obama /Biden round II to win.
YesQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
No they didn’t.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Yet you won’t share it.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
There are many things today and in the past which are verified by video evidence, written historical documents, and current eye witness testimony that you don’t want to believe, Guiss. However, it seems you love to believe things that can’t/won’t be proven. Kind of convenient because the winds of unscientific consensus can change and you just float along with it. Having no compass means you are never wrong and don’t think you will be held to account.
No I will not rehash all the things you believe and don’t believe. They will all come back around because we always come back to the same issues.
Frisco posted this nonsense yesterday.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
Pennsylvania Department of State’s response:
"In today’s release Rep. Ryan and others rehash, with the same lack of evidence and the same absence of supporting documentation, repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories regarding the November 3 election. State and federal judges have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting.
"Now, the legislators have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge.
"For instance, it is quite common to have significant "undervotes" for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn't a U.S. Senate race on the ballot. In 2000, Sen. Santorum received 200,000 more votes than President Bush, but the US Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.
"We are unclear as to what data the legislators used for this most recent “analysis.” But the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories. At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters. The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary.
"This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis.
"To put it simply, this so-called analysis was based on incomplete data."
Over and over.
It's fraud!
Nope, here is the explanation that you missed either in ignorance or (worse) you knew but claimed this crap anyway.
Crickets.
Look! Fraud!
Nope, you got the wrong state.
Crickets.
Look! Clear fraud!
No, that's the same thing as that other one. Remember this explanation?
No! Activist judges won't take the case!
Sigh. It's not fraudulent that the building was painted green.
Stop the steal!
What steal?
All the evidence!
Like what?
Rudy said so!
It's so tiring.
It has to be investigated or it will continue to happen. Otherwise we will become a one party socialist country.
When Obama ran in 2008, he got somewhere north of 69 million votes. I find it highly unlikely that Biden could exceed that vote count by 12 million votes without cheating. Highly unlikely.
Trump got more votes than in 2016 as well. More blacks and Latinos voted for Trump than in 2016. The funny business is focused in the swing states. Nothing adds up. We are supposed to believe the mail in ballots are the new norm and should tout that form of voting now.Quote:
Originally Posted by SicemDawgz
Our resident commies say it is "so tiring." Well what is so tiring is this repeated stealing of elections by the Dems. That has to stop. In the meantime, the focus has to be on Georgia. The commies are working hard to "steal out the vote!"Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Obama wasn't running against Trump. Elections are always referenda on the incumbent. Trump was a historic incumbent for a number of reasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by SicemDawgz
At the end of the day, most of you guys just can't seem to believe that most folks don't love this guy the way that y'all do. That's not fraud. We've got some 50+ cases that show this. It has been investigated. Those claiming fraud haven't produced compelling evidence.
The large turnout wasn’t about Biden. It was a referendum on the incumbent.Quote:
Originally Posted by SicemDawgz