Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
conference championships are about to be a thing of the past for the P5s too.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
What incentive is there to expand the playoffs? It may be team number 5, team number 9, team 17. It doesn't matter. Someone will feel left out. Expanding the playoff does nothing.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GatorDawg
What incentive is there to expand the playoffs? It may be team number 5, team number 9, team 17. It doesn't matter. Someone will feel left out. Expanding the playoff does nothing.
Depends on who #5 is. 8 allows all p5 champs a seat with 3 at-large. Expansion is coming.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
Depends on who #5 is. 8 allows all p5 champs a seat with 3 at-large. Expansion is coming.
What good does that serve? It's more likely IMO that it becomes P4 than expand the playoffs. 4 team playoff with 4 power conferences is the dream scenario.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GatorDawg
What good does that serve? It's more likely IMO that it becomes P4 than expand the playoffs. 4 team playoff with 4 power conferences is the dream scenario.
Not if you're a one loss dynasty program like UT or Bama.
The p5 are not content with just champs. Gotta provide for at-large. B1G may be the expansion driver.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
maddawg
Saying it won't change inside of 12 years is saying the Big10 will be complacent with never getting a bid. Let the SEC sit home one year (could happen in year 1) and see how quick they go to 8. Let Notre Dame getting a spot keep two of the P5 conferences out (could happen in year 1). I give it 4 years max before they go to 8.
^^^^THIS!!! My sentiments, exactly.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GatorDawg
What incentive is there to expand the playoffs? It may be team number 5, team number 9, team 17. It doesn't matter. Someone will feel left out. Expanding the playoff does nothing.
Sure it does. You've got more people intimately involved with the playoffs because THEIR TEAM is in it.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GatorDawg
What incentive is there to expand the playoffs? It may be team number 5, team number 9, team 17. It doesn't matter. Someone will feel left out. Expanding the playoff does nothing.
That's the standard talking point against more than 4.
It gives conferences a chance. The Big10 will likely be left out every year. The ACC is very lucky to have Florida State, but one slip up and they are out. Another ACC team is not likey even without a conference championship game. When the SEC does away with its championship game, they will likely have two teams every year. Not fair in the eyes of all the left coast and northern liberals.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GatorDawg
Expanding the playoff does nothing.
Expanding from 2 to 4 did nothing?
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
The commissioners as it stands right now with the P5 want 8 -
In reality that is all that matters and TV is willing to pay a kingly sum for 4 more teams
That said - I don't see it growing past 8 teams
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dwayne From Minden
The commissioners as it stands right now with the P5 want 8 -
In reality that is all that matters and TV is willing to pay a kingly sum for 4 more teams
That said - I don't see it growing past 8 teams
Of course there are no guarantees, but the odds are the best team in the country is in the top six with two buffer spots. I think eight does it.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
Not if you're a one loss dynasty program like UT or Bama.
The p5 are not content with just champs. Gotta provide for at-large. B1G may be the expansion driver.
They will change the rules to determine the teams before they add playoff spots.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dwayne From Minden
The commissioners as it stands right now with the P5 want 8 -
You are dead wrong on that. I know for a fact that they do not. If they did then it already would be 8.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Champ967
Expanding from 2 to 4 did nothing?
It hasn't yet. And if a top 2 seed wins the whole thing then it still did nothing.
Re: Conference Realignment 2014 edition
Quote:
Originally Posted by
maddawg
That's the standard talking point against more than 4.
It gives conferences a chance. The Big10 will likely be left out every year. The ACC is very lucky to have Florida State, but one slip up and they are out. Another ACC team is not likey even without a conference championship game. When the SEC does away with its championship game, they will likely have two teams every year. Not fair in the eyes of all the left coast and northern liberals.
Again you assume that all 5 power conferences survive. This is the crux to the discussion. I've previously stated that I think one dies soon.
Also I don't get where you think anyone will do away with the championship games. The SEC makes plenty of money off theirs. Others will soon serve as the quarter finals that you say are certain.