Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Champ967
Good to see you TT.
Thanks!
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CajunDave1
Yes. UL might have been left behind in some of the previous conference realignments, but we understood it was a marathon and not a sprint. Our University kept working and building our brand and the Sun Belt Conference. Then, low and behold, look what happened. UL and the SBC eventually caught Tech and CUSA in the home stretch and won the race!!!
Hey you simple dude from the 3 toed and 2 tooth Cajun gene pool; you haven’t won anything yet as the race isn’t over. And your brand is totally that of lying and cheating POS. You are our bitch but you’re having a great year in football for USL! Serious congrats! Great year!
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TYLERTECHSAS
Hey you simple dude from the 3 toed and 2 tooth Cajun gene pool; you haven’t won anything yet as the race isn’t over. And your brand is totally that of lying and cheating POS. You are our bitch but you’re having a great year in football for USL! Serious congrats! Great year!
Geeezz, why are you so mad? If you will just take your head out of your azzz, and read the opinion of all
Of the national media and others in the know, you will see that Louisiana and the Sun Belt Conference have indeed beat CUSA and el-aye-tech in this latest round of realignment! But don’t worry, I fully expect La Tech to now have a chance to win some games, and maybe even dominate the new CUSA 5.0 while Missouri State, McNeese, Sam Houston and Tarlington State (or something like that ?) get adjusted to the new CUSA!
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CajunDave1
Geeezz, why are you so mad? If you will just take your head out of your azzz, and read the opinion of all
Of the national media and others in the know, you will see that Louisiana and the Sun Belt Conference have indeed beat CUSA and el-aye-tech in this latest round of realignment! But don’t worry, I fully expect La Tech to now have a chance to win some games, and maybe even dominate the new CUSA 5.0 while Missouri State, McNeese, Sam Houston and Tarlington State (or something like that ?) get adjusted to the new CUSA!
Biggest losers on the planet? Opposing fans that troll another schools fan board. Bro, you’re pathetic.
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CajunDave1
Geeezz, why are you so mad? If you will just take your head out of your azzz, and read the opinion of all
Of the national media and others in the know, you will see that Louisiana and the Sun Belt Conference have indeed beat CUSA and el-aye-tech in this latest round of realignment! But don’t worry, I fully expect La Tech to now have a chance to win some games, and maybe even dominate the new CUSA 5.0 while Missouri State, McNeese, Sam Houston and Tarlington State (or something like that ?) get adjusted to the new CUSA!
Posts the little USL troll, on our board, whose own fan board bans those with opinions different vs. their drunken and lying self imposed insanity.
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HogDawg
Once in the Sunbelt, ALWAYS be in the Sunbelt. It's the "Hotel California" of football conferences. ("You can check out any time you like, but you can NEVER leave".) ULALA and ULM are great examples of this.
Best analogy and straight forward truth I have seen on this board!!!!! SOOOOOO TRUE! Many saw a good year for the belt last year and think it is a new shiny object. It is not... It is the same belt that we desperately wanted to move up from... It will be 10 times harder to go anywhere from there if we were in it...
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
champion110
Best analogy and straight forward truth I have seen on this board!!!!! SOOOOOO TRUE! Many saw a good year for the belt last year and think it is a new shiny object. It is not... It is the same belt that we desperately wanted to move up from... It will be 10 times harder to go anywhere from there if we were in it...
No it's not...unless you think floundering in nothingness for an unknown period of time is worth believing and repeating the lies our administration is telling us.
Here's your sign...we ain't goin' anywhere else because we never have. We joined a WAC that was raided and were left alone. We joined a CUSA that was depleted, then raided again and we are left even more alone.
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Here’s the sad truth, it doesn’t matter where we go when talking about football. All G5 programs are on the same ship that’s taking on water fast. There was only so many lifeboats, and the big schools took them. You might feel better because you’re in first class accommodations, but that won’t matter when the ship goes under. The gap between the haves and have nots is widening every year, and that chasm has now become so wide that we won’t ever get across it. Before it’s over with, the P5 will consist of only 4 conferences: SEC, ACC, B10 and PAC-12. We or nobody in this state besides LSU will ever be in one of them, because LSU would never allow it.
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Man in the mirror
Often when we, and I mean anyone, starts looking for reasons things aren't working out...there is, in large part, your answer.
How many MORE times will Tech get left behind in these conference shakeups before someone looks in the mirror? Yep, eventually, I think the AAC will lose some members and maybe then, Yo, little Tech, we have a vacancy...then too many in Tech Nation will thump their chests and think we got in based on merit. Tech lacks leadership and vision. And, true, we have geographic issues that are beyond our control. But that just means, to be ultimately successful, we have to check other boxes, such that a conference is willing to overlook the market size because we are just too good to pass up.
Anyway, it is NO surprise AAC passed on us, and many folks understand that. Now the Belch has passed on us too...although, I must admit, I honestly don't care about that. Someone turned on the light and I looked down those stairs into the Belch basement, and I'd rather stay here in the kitchen, thankyaverymuch.
All that said, we have issues in Ruston and until/unless we address those we'll continue to see this "abandoned on a desert island" scenario play out again and again.
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dawg80
Man in the mirror
Often when we, and I mean anyone, starts looking for reasons things aren't working out...there is, in large part, your answer.
How many MORE times will Tech get left behind in these conference shakeups before someone looks in the mirror? Yep, eventually, I think the AAC will lose some members and maybe then, Yo, little Tech, we have a vacancy...then too many in Tech Nation will thump their chests and think we got in based on merit. Tech lacks leadership and vision. And, true, we have geographic issues that are beyond our control. But that just means, to be ultimately successful, we have to check other boxes, such that a conference is willing to overlook the market size because we are just too good to pass up.
Anyway, it is NO surprise AAC passed on us, and many folks understand that. Now the Belch has passed on us too...although, I must admit, I honestly don't care about that. Someone turned on the light and I looked down those stairs into the Belch basement, and I'd rather stay here in the kitchen, thankyaverymuch.
All that said, we have issues in Ruston and until/unless we address those we'll continue to see this "abandoned on a desert island" scenario play out again and again.
Sums it up pretty well.
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Won’t feel much like separation and we won’t be looking down into anyone’s basement when we’re playing Sam Houston State!
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
champion110
It will be 10 times harder
twss
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SicemDawgz
Here’s the sad truth, it doesn’t matter where we go when talking about football. All G5 programs are on the same ship that’s taking on water fast. There was only so many lifeboats, and the big schools took them. You might feel better because you’re in first class accommodations, but that won’t matter when the ship goes under. The gap between the haves and have nots is widening every year, and that chasm has now become so wide that we won’t ever get across it. Before it’s over with, the P5 will consist of only 4 conferences: SEC, ACC, B10 and PAC-12. We or nobody in this state besides LSU will ever be in one of them, because LSU would never allow it.
Power 4? Where is the Big 12 going?
Re: Serious Conference Realignment Discussion
Man, this whole things sucks pretty bad. Obviously the actual conference falling apart is the literal worst thing about this realignment. But I have to say, ULL trolls coming around again (after a nice break) may be the 2nd worst part of it all. I haven't missed that at all.
And we're probably stuck with it for a long time. I mean, heck, one of our best cases at this point would be getting into the 'belt where we'd have them around regularly. *sigh*
As to CUSA, my vote (for what it's worth) would be to do just about the bare minimum to remain in existence for now (we need those sweet sweet buy-outs and maybe even buy-ins if we can get them). If 8 is the minimum, get to 8, ideally with some travel partner situations (NMSU seems to be the only real no-brainer here, if only because they're the ones most likely to say yes right away). FCS start up like SHSU or Missouri State is fine. Maybe EKU. I'm not sure it's a good fit for them or us to try to get the NE schools in. I think UConn and UMass are content to just play each other and barn-storm the rest of the year. If Liberty isn't interested I am ok with that (but any port in a storm, if they want in that's cool too).
I bet they shoot for 10 (and given the fact that any school would leave in a second I understand that) but I'd cap things at 9. It's perfect number for football. But I'd probably rather have 8 than 10 given who we could expect to get.