Amen!Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Printable View
Amen!Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Maybe you were thinking of the New York Times, that lib rag. Now, that would represent a surprise!Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Trump needs to nominate a replacement for Barrett on the 7th Circuit and the Senate confirm him/her ASAP. And it should NOT be a current sitting GOP office holder. Remember the Jeff Sessions disaster...
Speaking of which! How is Coach Tuberville doing in Alabama in his campaign? Will Bama fans vote for him?
Of course the commie media has never covered it. All the lying Dems ever have is pulling the race card, hatred card and this year the China flu.
Published 4 hours ago
Trump denounces White supremacy '38 times' in new campaign video, amid Biden-Harris criticisms
The Trump campaign rolled out a nearly 5-minute-long video of the president
The Trump campaign on Tuesday released a video compiling more than three dozen times President Trump has denounced White supremacy, as his Democratic rival Joe Biden and his running mate Sen. Kamala Harris of California continue to claim this week on the campaign trail that he has failed to do so.
More
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tru...y-biden-harris
The GDP grew a stunning 33% in the 3rd Qtr. Wow! Taken by itself that is more than incredible...it is a record of monumental proportions. Of course, you can't look at it in vacuum given where we were in 2nd qtr. Still, it is good news and shows how quickly our economy can, and has snapped back.
Remember, the economy was BOOMING! before the China virus hoax shutdown sidelined it. And I see unemployment is down to 7.4%. Also good news...unless of course you are Goosey et al rooting for Americans to suffer so it will hurt bad Orange Man.
That is quarter over quarter. Unlike China, we are way down year over year.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
First, you need to stop all this Chicom praise. We already know you're in the tank for communists.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
As for the comparison of 2020 to 2019 in GDP...well, duh! 2019 was an incredible year, and we are just now starting to dig ourselves out of the hole caused by you China virus hoaxers. And, isn't it amazing...connect the dots: China virus released on the world, including the US...the Bidens on the take from the Chicoms...China's economy doing well...the Bidens on the take from the Chicoms...
It all makes sense.
Unemployment rate is down to 6.9%. The positive trend is continuing.
If Harris-Biden is successful in stealing the election...well, their operatives...then it'll be a shame this economic rally will tank early next year. Actually, it will probably tank before then just on the anticipation of the anti-business/free market crap to come.
I think someone should go ahead and call time of death on this disaster presidency.
Biden leads in PA now. It is done.
Wonder who draws the short straw and has to inform Donald that is time to start packing his bags.
Not just yet Comrade, hopefully Trump will take the whole cheating mess to court. I’m fine with him carrying this over into next year.
He is done. People are probably just too scared to tell him yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bone_afide_Dawg
Don't rub it in. The person I voted for probably didn't win either (still got my fingers crossed).Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Drain the swamp!
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/01/polit...ent/index.html
Americans just pulled the drain plug!Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
Not really. Lots of incumbents that should be, at the very least, retired and/or barred from public life are still around.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I wonder how history will treat Donald Trump as POTUS and as a person. I am nearly halfway through a book on Napoleon and it is chock full of information I was not aware of, and I have read plenty about NP. Like science, history is such that the more you learn, the more you realize what you don't know. This book is a no-holes-barred all-out telling of the truth of Napoleon, the good and the bad, and it is absolutely fascinating. Like all historic figures, there's a lot more to NP than the average "history book" reveals.
I suspect, in Trump's case, there will be many volumes of both pro and con telling of the "truth." It won't be until long after he, and most of us, are dead and gone that a book with ALL the REAL TRUTH will be published. I predict, if it is anywhere close to being as accurate and fair as the book "Napoleon: A Life" is many people who thought they knew Trump, from both sides, will have their eyes opened. I also predict...because obviously I am not privy to some secret "truth," so it is just a prediction...that Trump, the historic figure, will do well in his public policy contributions, and have a very mixed bag in his personal life. And NO!!! I am not comparing, or equating Trump to Napoleon. Just making the point that there is always much more to a historic figure than "history" reveals.
Today, now, most people are locked into their own, VERY narrow view of Trump with a day to day assessment of every word he utters, everything he does. That's normal. And of course, people have chosen a side... but, real history is not burdened with such partisanship. Most people, today, think they know Abraham Lincoln...most people don't have a clue who he was. They are only familiar with the very, very limited popular history.
For instance, did you know that President Lincoln was very unpopular during his first term...in the north!? Of course, the South didn't care for him at all, but he was on the political hot seat in the north too. Many of the criticisms, as we now have the advantage of historic hindsight, were contrived misinformation. Can you imagine! He was particularly unpopular in New England, dismissed as a western hillbilly, and later HATED in the mid-west, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio in particular, for wanting to give blacks "equal" status to whites. Lincoln was hammered daily in the press. And as the coffins from the battlefields began to pile up at train stations, a movement simmered to IMPEACH Lincoln. Today, most Americans will simply say, Lincoln was a great POTUS, one of the best in our history and everyone loves him...and surely loved him back then. Nah! he only overcame most of the criticism when the war ended and he was assassinated. Then even his most harshest critics were moved to feel a loss...as in, he was a buffoon, but didn't deserve to be killed.
History will look back on Trump as that WTF moment of the greatest country in the world when it decided to try crack.
LOL! spoken like a true anti-Lincolnite of the 1860's....Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
William Barr is gone...effective Dec 23rd.
100% loyalty. All the time. Even in fantasyland.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
So where did we stand on Trump wanting more money in the stimulus vs. the RINOs insisting on less?
I don't know what the magic amount should be (should have been) but I thought it was an interesting situation and wondered where the Trump fans stood on the matter? Is this the one thing that "true conservatives" part ways with him on?
Rand Paul has this and many things right that Trump did not have right.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
LOL. You Trump haters are such small-time thinkers.There are a lot of things about Trump to dislike and/or disagree with. But he’s a hell of a lot better than the alternative.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
But go ahead and support the party that hates America and wants to destroy it. OMB so let’s support corrupt, lying, racist Joe Biden that has a 40 year record of failure. He won’t be president long anyway. You’re really supporting Harris.
And yet....where were these RINOs when they were passing a bill that included money for gender studies in Pakistan. Where was their outrage then? Crickets.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
I am against passing out cash in the form of government checks AND wasting hard-earned taxpayer money on stupid stuff like gender studies and paying off the student loans of people that willingly signed the papers to get those loans and a host of other idiotic issues.
I am for the states taking money (stealing) from their own taxpayers to refund every penny lost by small businesses that have gone bankrupt because of asinine politically-motivated lockdowns (you know, the ones where you can go to Walmart or Target or Costco or burn a building while throwing rocks at a policeman but you cannot go to church or open the doors to your SMALL business to make enough money to pay the bills).
Exactly. I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
Those weren’t gender studies in Pakistan, but were to advance women’s rights, which is single handedly the best thing you can do to promote peace and stability in the region.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
And that wasn’t the stimulus bill. That was the omnibus appropriations bill.
Yes, goosey, we are well aware that this was the omnibus bill. SO WHAT? Do the taxes that support that foolishness come from someplace else? Didn't think so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Women's rights in Pakistan? Well, we'd better be ready to fight a big religious war, because that's the way it works there. Perhaps you think that Islamic nations are $hitholes....and for the first time I'd have to agree with you. But that won't stop your whining and narcissistic self-aggrandizing the next time someone you have been told to disagree with refers to someplace as a $hithole.
Actually, it appears Trump was doing the best things to promote peace in the region.
We promote women’s rights in these regions because it makes us more safe here.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
So you agree Trump is a joke now?Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conten...ctober2019.pdf
Let's see how long it takes peace loving Biden and the RINOs to get us in more crap. I'm sure it will be blamed on bad orange man and Israel.
I agree you are a clown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Everything else I have my own thoughts and logic to guide me. I can agree or disagree with Trump on specific issues. I am not like you at all.
Yeah, I think you're pissing away taxpayer cash trying to civilize barbarians. We might as well fund sending jorts and Tech T-shirts to them. I agree with the tactic of isolating the bad guys and normalizing relationships with the non-hostile ones to further isolate the ones that will likely be getting more plane loads of cash soon. I am sure that cash was spent on women's education and rights...lol.
Exactly! I’m bringing to think Harris/Biden voters are somewhat possessed. There is absolutely zero common sense to voting fir Obama/Biden II with the Harris and evenQuote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
more socialist push. Not to mention the massive 70,000,000 baby killing numbers as well as same sex marriage. I really believe Christians will be held accountable voting for this evil as it’s the prophesied “falling away” imho.
I take it you didn’t read the White House strategy paper.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
Wasn't an issue of supporting Biden or Trump here. It was Republicans vs Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by glm47
I was just wondering how that plays among big Trump fans. I'd have assumed a split, with maybe several BB&B Trump fans opposing him this time. It's somewhat rare to hear his proponents disagree with him, so I was curious what that would sound like.
So far it sounds like "the democrats are evil" but that's not really relevant to the topic. Odd.
All hypocrites. Both sides. No arguments here on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
So in the $600 vs. $2,000 debate you were on team $0?
You support Trump. You have nothing to stand on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Again. As Rand Paul said, why stop at $2000?Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
That's not the way it works. Being a Trump hater doesn't make you worthy to judge him any more than me being a fan of many things he did.Quote:
Originally Posted by JuBru
Because that's what the President wanted?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Apparently the question shouldn't be the President's $2,000 vs the Congressional $600, it should be those two vs nothing?
I mean, that's an argument, too. But it's another argument at odds with the President. Which is (of course) fine. But not something you see much of from Trump's big backers.
I am on team "open the businesses and let people thrive". And you cannot say that is dangerous, because Walmart and Target and a bunch of other places are already open and are thriving while people are ruined by this stupidity.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
$6oo bucks, or even $2000, won't keep people alive. At today's prices, that's depression-era income....maybe less.
And through it all, the government that is destroying the livelihood and futures of people that put their heart and soul into their businesses (in this supposed land of freedom and choice) is still collecting paychecks as normal.
Maybe freedom has become more than most Americans can handle.
LOL! I am convinced this is the highlight of your life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Small businesses won’t thrive again until COVID is under control.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
Yeah, that was part of the plan. It's okay to keep the big chains and grocery stores open without ANY restrictions, but shut down all the small eating spots and shops in the socialist states and cities.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
They are creating government dependents. I have to think it's the goal.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
I hope people are noticing that being dependent on the government will pretty much get you almost enough to survive and that's about it. At that point you'll vote for anyone that promises you another dollar. Note the folks that are making those decisions are doing fine.
It's what the dem party has been doing to a vast percentage of black folks for years. Take away their choices and you can keep them enslaved forever.....and make them think it's for their own benefit.
Obviously, it’s the deep state.
It's the same people who think Obamacare was a good idea along with those who think single pay is even better. They want control, not for things to get better.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
They can't just be wrong?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Sure, they could be, but that doesn’t scare enough people. It’s gotta be the deep state. Deep state grift is much more profitable then “they’re wrong”.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
For over 50 years?Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
Deep state is not the democrat party alone. Who was "grifting" when they (the deep state) was spying on Trump? You denying that happened now?Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
You don't know anyone who has been an LSU fan for over 50 years?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
There is no cap on "being wrong."
These are the same people who control the education system. You think it has gotten better over the past 50 years? Think they don't know it has gotten worse since they took control? It's not about being right or wrong, it's about control and corruption.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
So is it deep state if you use the power of the presidency to try and hurt your political opponents?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
You know what is going on, but you are in denial because it fits your "hate orange man" narrative. You've won now. Go join your fellow voters who want to destroy Israel, ban fracking, defund the police, totally open borders, and go back to the "free trade" agreements that have allowed China to rule the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
Socialist and communist want, and have to, eliminate the middle class to survive. This is how the elitist Dems will do it as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I know what you’ve been told is going on. You don’t wanna answer my question?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
The Deep State is BS that grifters use to get votes and viewers, but even if it wasn’t, Trump was a terrible choice to try and kill it. All he killed was the GOP. I know...you’re fine with that.
Bottom line for you is that you hated Trump and anything associated with him...even the good things were bad to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
Yes, the GOP is only makeup for so called conservatives who are part of the problem.
That’s not the bottom line...it just makes it easy to dismiss critiques if you boil all critics down to “haters”.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
LOL. Actually he made the GOP a big tent party and not just the party of white chamber of commerce types.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
It's a good narrative you are spouting, but not true at all.
If Trump started his own party, the GOP would disintegrate overnight, and members of the party would win as many elections as Repubs would have won.
Small dine-in eating spots operating at capacity is an awful idea during a pandemic.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
The grocery stores in my area were operating under restrictions.
He infected the Republican Party with his cult-of-personality venereal disease.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
No. These folks plan everything. Hillary designed and tried to force socialized medicine on American taxpayers in 1993 as Slick’s wife. And with Sen. Teddy “the murderer” Kennedy she almost succeeded. Many on here were just pups back then.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
That’s because 99.9% of them are haters.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
No that was Bill and Hillary Clinton using the Democrat party and abusing their poor and minority voting base as bad as Hussein Obama.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Like Obama/Biden did to Trump?Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
RINO’s killed the GOP. That’s how Trump got elected. The GOP was a joke long before Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
LOL, you latched on to the new liberal term. You use it a lot. I guess that’s to be expected since you are a liberal.
Yep...you thought the GOP was dead. Just give it a few years and you’ll see what dead looks like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy McCarthy
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/...mpression=true
I actually think this could be great for America, but only if the left split a couple of ways too. Otherwise you'd split too many votes and just hand everything to the Democrats as they exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
But 2-3 rightish parties (Trumpests, Libertarians, whatever's left of the current Republicans) and 2-3 leftish parties (Green party? Status quo Dems? Actual socialists?) having to form coalitions to govern? Ranked voting? Heck yeah.
If you could break the two party system you'd probably even get the occasional actual outsider elected somewhere. Or could vote in good conscience for an upright person rather than just against the other team's policies.
If AOC or Bernie would promise to split off too I'd take this in a heartbeat.
Interesting article with some salient points. But, this writer just boiled it down to what some of us already knew: it is Trump's personality "flaws" vs. his actual accomplishments.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
Absent the economic collapse wrought by the China virus, and all the arbitrary and mostly stupid local/state regulations, Trump's economy was booming. And given a second term and the same trend line of economic growth, Trump was on schedule to record the 3rd best economy for a two-term POTUS in US history. And, close enough to #1 Clinton and #2 Reagan, to truly say, "great job Mr. President." Trump also made some inroads that both Clinton and Reagan missed, namely tremendous improvements for women and minorities who actually reaped the benefits of a booming economy like never before. YES!!! to present a fair analysis, Trump also was guilty of growing the national debt. That is something both Clinton and Reagan managed to avoid, at a catastrophic level.
In terms of the US's place in the world, Trump positioned us back in the catbird seat. He stepped on a lot of toes...that needed STOMPING on! and got the attention of both our allies and especially our enemies. There were NO NEW WARS started under Trump! He closed out ISIS and put China on its heels serving notice the Chicoms would not have their way in the world.
One of his premier accomplishments was denying Krooked Killary the WH! Something none of those lame regular GOP candidates had a prayer of doing. You know the type: the POS spineless John McCain, Mitt Romney types, and oh! good ole Jeb Bush who was knocked out of the race early. Rubio and Cruz were (are) "okay" but they would have been seen as just two more GOPers and not energized the populace to rise up and stop Krooked Killary the way Trump was able to. The world will forever be grateful Mizz Klinton was kept out!!!
History will be kind to Trump because truth finds its way into the light. And, it will be even more stark once Harris-Biden eff up everything really soon.
As for the GOP, well, they are in a dogfight in Georgia and if the lousy, can't-organize-a-barbeque, old school GOP can't beat those two commie bastards the Dems have put up...even given shenanigans in the voting...then shame on them and it's on them. Trump is gone...as far as the GOP is concerned. This is their battle.
If the RINO's don't win Georgia it will be bad orange man's fault. Everything negative that happens to our country over the next several years will be his fault.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
They're pretty underwhelming candidates on their own. Kind of Trump sycophants, which would be a knock from me, but will help with others (they're both betting on this obviously).Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
I'd probably blame the Kracken more than Trump himself for all the "don't vote unless they cancel the presidential vote" trash. He's been slightly better on that message (more of a "you can't trust the election process but vote anyway" vibe). And of course he's motivating for turnout on the other side.
But I think him losing ought to help Republicans win. Americans tend to try to counter the executive in Congress. So maybe he deserves some credit if one or both win (you know, for losing).
The Dems went all in fraud for the WH so why not go for the senate in GA as well? I predict the socialist steal both seats.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
Yes, the two socialists will get an obscene amount of votes over what they got in round one. The haters will say that the increase is due to Trump supporters sitting out.:icon_roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
3M early votes = almost 50% of total voting block.
Why do people NOT vote early?Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
If they had some brilliant undetectable scheme the first time around, why didn't they just flip the Senate then?Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
True Americans aren’t afraid of standing in a line to vote the correct way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
What a clown: https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit....co/bZNuLLIT1Z
At what point do his defenders become clowns?Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
52 USC 20511(2)(B)
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...dition:prelim)
June 16, 2015Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Though, he had some support in some previous elections.
You voted for a guy with Alzheimer’sQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
You voted for a guy that doesn’t respect our Constitution, the office he occupies, or the democratic and rule-of-law principles on which our country is established.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Didn't vote for any of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Stop clowning.Quote:
Originally Posted by PawDawg
Gussie still doesn't poop know what he tries to write about. Stupid is as stupid does. He is what he is. The dumbocrats have contested the last three elections they lost. Never accepted Pres Trump as the president. NO president has kept or tried to keep the campaign promises like he has. In the beginning of his term
when the cry baby was Speaker (also a never Trumper) and Paul Ryan became speaker (he also was a never Trumper) he did not have their support.
Are you serious? The democrats don't give a damn about the constitution. If the democrats win tomorrow, there will be no checks on Pelosi, Schumer, Biden and his whore vp. They'll raise our taxes and give our tax money away just like they did with the tax money for the china virus. Biden and Hunter and Biden's brother have already taken millions from china and several more countries. Biden will sell our country to any country that gives him and his family money.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Your post has been debunked a long time ago. Besides you accuse others of what you and your party believe and do. Rich....Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
The Trumplican Party
Of course it is nothing but Internet chatter right now, but it is intriguing to think of Trump starting a Third Party. If he could get 80 million people to follow him...who knows what would happen? The GOP is nothing but RINOs, Swampers and/or spineless pricks...and a few good ones, who would probably jump to the Trumplican Party too! Would add a lot of intertest to the soon-to-be thread on this forum: Presidential Election 2024. :D
Chris Cuomo dubbed them ReTrumplicans.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
I would love to see a coalition style multi-party system rather than the 2 party system we've backed into.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
But you'd want more than just Democrats/Republicans/Trumpicans (or whatever).
You need the left to splinter some, too. And probably for the Libertarians and Green Party to strengthen a little.
There are drawbacks to this system, too. But it'd be worth seeing.
We don’t need more parties. We need more pragmatists. More people to join the Problem Solvers Caucus and fewer people being party loyalists.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
Any surprise that Trump incites the crowd last night and then throws them under the bus tonight?
more (viable) parties would force that, no?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
It might push it in that direction some.Quote:
Originally Posted by arkansasbob
May just happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by inudesu
I suspect the dem party is going to crater in the midst of all this. For 4 years the only thing that united them was the desire to get rid of Trump, the guy that beat what was supposed to be their disgusting appointee to the position. Not all dems are incredibly stupid like some of the ones on here and actually do not wish to defund the police, support China at any cost, or open the borders and let millions of immigrants into our welfare system. The only thing they really all agree upon is the desire to abort as many black babies as possible.
They've just had that moment in time similar to when the USA was attacked on 9/11, when every American was waving a flag and vowing to get the parties responsible for the attack. Now that Trump is gone, they are going to have to agree on more than that. I suspect they won't be voting as a single voting block going forward, like they did when Trump occupied the WH whether their votes were good for America or not. Now each faction will want credit for winning the last elections and want THEIR specific agendas to be implemented. Expect a lot of infighting....finally. They were as lemming-like as Goosey for four long years, waiting for their marching orders to make sure they ALWAYS took a position opposite of Trump, even if that meant screwing the very people that sent them there to supposedly govern.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Quote:
Originally Posted by arkansasbob
Yeah I don't know that we don't still get ideologues (maybe worse for that) and venal career opportunists. Multi-party isn't without problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Some of those countries have to reset the government every other day it seems.
But combine a few more parties with ranked voting and we'd at least be adding some incentives for pragmatism (while preserving/gaining the opportunity to vote your conscience that we don't have with just the two.
There will certainly be some divisiveness among the Democrats. Didn't AOC just say recently that in most countries (or if we had more than 2 options or something like that) that she and Biden almost certainly wouldn't share a party?
That's part of why I don't love having just the two. If you're an actual socialist like Bernie, you've got to vote with the ones who are in the pockets of industry. If you're socially liberal but financially conservative like a Silicon Valley Executive you've got to pick a lane (or hedge your bets and donate to both). If you're generally pro immigration but otherwise socially conservative, where do you go? You compromise.
And short of everyone running for everything you can't ever get totally bespoke political parties.
But 4-8? I'd be curious to see how that worked.
Could totally backfire, but to get anything done you'd have to work with at least some other groups.
Again, not a perfect fix, and for sure a lot of personal wish-fulfillment projection as someone dissatisfied with the party he almost exclusively votes for based mostly on one key issue (and several more lesser ones).
Good post. Yep, the Democraps will start eating their own now. Tucker had a monologue on this last night, and basically said for the past 4 years+ it has all been about Trump. Either you liked him or hated him, but in either case the entire political landscape revolved around him. Now the Dems have their own senile, wishy-washy "leader" (LOL) to focus their angst on.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgyNWindow
Last night the stupid libtard mayor of Portland was attacked while he was dining out...maskless. Guvnar Newsome (Calif) is facing a recall. The Dems have marched in lockstep, aided under the table by the RINOs mired in the Swamp, but now there is no longer a "common enemy." And there is no doubt that Harris-Biden, egged on by Crazy Bernie & AOC et al, and all made possible by the two POS Schumer and Pelosi, that very soon Americans will realize what a huge mistake they just made. Especially since we Americans did not really elect this goofy socialist bunch...
:laugh: Yep! only at the very end did he play the "political" card. That is, he finally acted like all other politicians do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp