Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

I find it so predictable and fascinating that Bolton, a man who could not get appointed as ambassador to the UN is now the beacon of honesty and integrity in DC. This man is such a war hawk, he makes Hillary look like a nun. If Bolton had his way, we would be at war with Iran, Venezuela, Syria, North Korea, and Russia all at the same time. I was shocked that Trump brought him in to his admin as national security advisor given Bolton's historical positions and Trump's campaign of stopping endless wars and bringing troops home.

This was part of CNN's show last night. I'm sure Guissy was watching and getting a big laugh and agreeing with them as it aired.. probably crying as Don Lemon did. This is exactly how Guissy has acted on here with his posts.

A rare moment of honesty from CNN. They forgot to hide behind a farcical veneer of impartiality for a moment. That was real, that's who they are when the cameras are off, that's what they think of anybody who voted for and supports Donald Trump.

They detest you, mock you, portray you as simple minded hillbillies who ain't got no fancy school house learnin while a stooge like Don Lemon wets himself with laughter because its everything he wants you to be.


https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/sta...07769542418437

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FriscoDog

I find it so predictable and fascinating that Bolton, a man who could not get appointed as ambassador to the UN is now the beacon of honesty and integrity in DC. This man is such a war hawk, he makes Hillary look like a nun. If Bolton had his way, we would be at war with Iran, Venezuela, Syria, North Korea, and Russia all at the same time. I was shocked that Trump brought him in to his admin as national security advisor given Bolton's historical positions and Trump's campaign of stopping endless wars and bringing troops home.

---

The Constitutution empowers the POTUS to set our nation's foreign policy. (and yes, only Congress can declare war, but the POTUS has to ask them to do so). President Trump is strong-willed and knows what he wants to do. I think in foreign policy, and in all aspects of governing, it is a good idea to have diverse array of opinions to hear all sides before rendering a final decision. In this case Bolton was a hawk advocating for action, for military intervention, probably in every case to which Trump would listen and say, thanks John, I'll consider that point of view. But, yes, Trump campaigned on ending the "endless wars" and bringing our troops home. Not something Bolton would agree with. No doubt that caused friction between them.

I am so disappointed in the woke-scold media. They tried to go after Ted Cruz and his children since there is justifiable desire to see corruption, including the Bidens, investigated. They are so wrapped up in defending the Bidens that they missed an opportunity to get Cruz with their ultimate pet issue.

Why didn’t they accuse him of forcing his daughter to be a girl by encouraging her to play basketball and softball. Why wouldn’t he encourage her to play football and baseball? Such a male chauvinist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Which fact do you disagree with?

---

What is so funny is that you believe Joe did not know what Hunter was doing in Ukraine or China. Why did Joe have the prosecutor that was investigating Burisma and the crooked owner removed if he didn't know what his son was doing? I think John Durham and William Barr will have something to say about this. This was going on at the top level of our government. If Joe didn't know about it, he was the only one in Obama's administration that didn't, including Obama.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DONW

What is so funny is that you believe Joe did not know what Hunter was doing in Ukraine or China. Why did Joe have the prosecutor that was investigating Burisma and the crooked owner removed if he didn't know what his son was doing? I think John Durham and William Barr will have something to say about this. This was going on at the top level of our government. If Joe didn't know about it, he was the only one in Obama's administration that didn't, including Obama.

---

The prosecutor that Joe got fired was trying to procure bribes from Zlochevsky not to prosecute Zlochevsky/Burisma. Why do you keep ignoring this well publicized fact? That is why everyone, including conservatives wanted the prosecutor out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FriscoDog

This was part of CNN's show last night. I'm sure Guissy was watching and getting a big laugh and agreeing with them as it aired.. probably crying as Don Lemon did. This is exactly how Guissy has acted on here with his posts.

A rare moment of honesty from CNN. They forgot to hide behind a farcical veneer of impartiality for a moment. That was real, that's who they are when the cameras are off, that's what they think of anybody who voted for and supports Donald Trump.

They detest you, mock you, portray you as simple minded hillbillies who ain't got no fancy school house learnin while a stooge like Don Lemon wets himself with laughter because its everything he wants you to be.


https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/sta...07769542418437

---

Lol. That’s great!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FriscoDog

I find it so predictable and fascinating that Bolton, a man who could not get appointed as ambassador to the UN is now the beacon of honesty and integrity in DC. This man is such a war hawk, he makes Hillary look like a nun. If Bolton had his way, we would be at war with Iran, Venezuela, Syria, North Korea, and Russia all at the same time. I was shocked that Trump brought him in to his admin as national security advisor given Bolton's historical positions and Trump's campaign of stopping endless wars and bringing troops home.

---

You don’t want him to testify and be cross-examined. The evidence that the House presented shows that he would be a direct witness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

The prosecutor that Joe got fired was trying to procure bribes from Zlochevsky not to prosecute Zlochevsky/Burisma. Why do you keep ignoring this well publicized fact? That is why everyone, including conservatives wanted the prosecutor out.

---

That's not what Pam Bondi said yesterday. What you're saying are lies that were spread by democrats and CNN and MSNBC. Pam Bondi did her homework and she found out that Biden fired the guy that was investigating Burisma and his son. Biden knew he couldn't get tied up in that investigation because his son was getting payola and so he had the prosecutor fired and used our tax money to enforce his power. I believe that's what they call quid pro quo. Trump always gets accused of doing something the democrats have already done.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DONW

That's not what Pam Bondi said yesterday. What you're saying are lies that were spread by democrats and CNN and MSNBC. Pam Bondi did her homework and she found out that Biden fired the guy that was investigating Burisma and his son. Biden knew he couldn't get tied up in that investigation because his son was getting payola and so he had the prosecutor fired and used our tax money to enforce his power. I believe that's what they call quid pro quo. Trump always gets accused of doing something the democrats have already done.

---

What I said doesn’t contradict what she said. She just left out certain facts in an effort to mislead you. The info about the prosecutor being a so called “diamond prosecutor”.

Here is an article from the U.K. explaining how corrupt that prosecutor (Shokin) was.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ind...001.html%3famp

“Neither Shokin nor Poroshenko wanted to investigate [Burisma owner Mykola​] Zlochevsky,” says Sakvarelidze. “They simply began a criminal case, arrested a few assets, and began negotiating with the corruptioneer for a bribe.”

In other words, he wasn’t effectively prosecuting the investigation. Yes, there was an investigation, but no it was not really active. Shokin wasn’t trying to see the investigation to the end. It was effectively dormant at the time he was canned.

Nearly everyone agreed (at the time) that Shokin was part of the problem. Some conservatives are engaging in some revisionist history, ignoring critical facts, to make a fake conspiracy theory. Trump buys into it because it helps him.

And doesn't matter what Creepy Joe's motives were...even though most of us know the truth...he used a $billion in aid slated for Ukraine as leverage to get what he wanted, the prosecutor fired. Said aid voted on/authorized by Congress. Goosey will deny it even though there's a video of Biden bragging about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

What I said doesn’t contradict what she said. She just left out certain facts in an effort to mislead you. The info about the prosecutor being a so called “diamond prosecutor”.

Here is an article from the U.K. explaining how corrupt that prosecutor (Shokin) was.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ind...001.html%3famp

“Neither Shokin nor Poroshenko wanted to investigate [Burisma owner Mykola​] Zlochevsky,” says Sakvarelidze. “They simply began a criminal case, arrested a few assets, and began negotiating with the corruptioneer for a bribe.”

In other words, he wasn’t effectively prosecuting the investigation. Yes, there was an investigation, but no it was not really active. Shokin wasn’t trying to see the investigation to the end. It was effectively dormant at the time he was canned.

Nearly everyone agreed (at the time) that Shokin was part of the problem. Some conservatives are engaging in some revisionist history, ignoring critical facts, to make a fake conspiracy theory. Trump buys into it because it helps him.

---

Guess who I'm going to believe, a left wing lunatic or a conservative republican. I don't believe Pam Bondi lied. She did her work and investigated the case. Don't waste your time linking to left wing newspapers, magazines or CNN or MSNBC. Those are all run by left wing loons like you that hate trump. Biden should go to prison for bribing government officials of another country. We now know why Obama wants nothing to do with him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

And doesn't matter what Creepy Joe's motives were...even though most of us know the truth...he used a $billion in aid slated for Ukraine as leverage to get what he wanted, the prosecutor fired. Said aid voted on/authorized by Congress. Goosey will deny it even though there's a video of Biden bragging about it.

---

These loans were always contingent on Ukraine meeting their IMF obligations around anti-corruption.

The big difference is that Biden was carrying out the specific foreign policy directives of Obama acting in concert with Department of State, EU and IMF, rather than his personal political gain.

Another important difference is that Biden was fighting corruption rather than instigating corruption like Trump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DONW

Guess who I'm going to believe, a left wing lunatic or a conservative republican. I don't believe Pam Bondi lied. She did her work and investigated the case. Don't waste your time linking to left wing newspapers, magazines or CNN or MSNBC. Those are all run by left wing loons like you that hate trump. Biden should go to prison for bribing government officials of another country. We now know why Obama wants nothing to do with him.

---

She omitted facts that are well known. She didn’t tell you the whole story because she was hoping to mislead you. You want to be mislead obviously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

She omitted facts that are well known. She didn’t tell you the whole story because she was hoping to mislead you. You want to be mislead obviously.

---

I won't be mislead by a crazy left wing lunatic like you that hates the President. Pam Bondi is telling the truth. Go stick your head back up Schiff's butt. Trump will not be impeached and you're going to see 4 more years of him. Enjoy it.:D