Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
Or those that love him...right?
I don't believe arrogance is ever an act love, care, or kindness.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
I don't believe arrogance is ever an act love, care, or kindness.
You lost me there.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
You lost me there.
Definition of arrogance
: an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
techman05
I heard Schiff move the goal posts again. I guess he is a brilliant orator. He said it so smoothly, the left media just sopped it up like spaghetti sauce and garlic bread. The left is all for investigating Trump and Trump Campaign, but not investigating corruption, which happens to involve Hunter because he is the son of a man who announced a run for the White House after the investigation started.
So were Hitler, Fidel, Stalin, Obama and Mussolini .
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Obama is mistakenly taken as a great speaker. He was a great reader. Get him away from the teleprompter and he stammers, stutters, and starts to accentuate that whistling crap he does. He can't speak off the cuff. Never could.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
Definition of arrogance
: an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions
I know what arrogance means. Not sure how it follows from your previous posts.
I pointed out that Trump supporters are making assumptions about intent while griping about others doing the same. There’s a word for that, but it’s not arrogance.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
This is why Republicans can’t let Bolton testify. So many theories of plausible deniability will go away, and all that you are left with is what Mulvaney said originally Trump’s Administration “does this all the time so get over it.”
When left with the argument that cheating, self dealing and corruption are not impeachable, most Republicans will still take it. But that is an awful thing for them to have to admit to.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
This is why Republicans can’t let Bolton testify.
When it comes to cheating, self dealing and corruption, Clinton, Biden, Obama, Schiff, and Pelosi are the best.
Fixed it for you.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Super Schiff.
A Real American Hero.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
I know what arrogance means. Not sure how it follows from your previous posts.
I pointed out that Trump supporters are making assumptions about intent while griping about others doing the same. There’s a word for that, but it’s not arrogance.
...and I pointed out that Trump supporters are the ones assuming what he was thinking. Trump supporters are going with what he actually said and did. See how it works? The word for you and other Trump haters is arrogant.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
...and I pointed out that Trump supporters are the ones assuming what he was thinking. Trump supporters are going with what he actually said and did. See how it works? The word for you and other Trump haters is arrogant.
We don’t have a transcript of what he said. But even if he said “Us” as used in the memorandum, that literally proves nothing. It was a pretext. We know this for the six reasons I already stated.
There is no “ha, I didn’t say the magic words so I am off the hook” defense. This case doesn’t turn on one phone call.
This was a shakedown that took place over months with lots of interactions between Sondland, Volker, Rudy and Zelenksy’s Administration where we were negotiating and offering a White House meeting but only if Zelensky would go on CNN and make an announcement up to the standard that Trump would accept (Rudy being the arbiter of that). It turns out - proven by text exchanges - that only a statement that specifically mentioned Burisma and elections investigations would earn the White House visit.
Did you not see this part of the trial?
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
We don’t have a transcript of what he said. But even if he said “Us” as used in the memorandum, that literally proves nothing. It was a pretext. We know this for the six reasons I already stated.
There is no “ha, I didn’t say the magic words so I am off the hook” defense. This case doesn’t turn on one phone call.
This was a shakedown that took place over months with lots of interactions between Sondland, Volker, Rudy and Zelenksy’s Administration where we were negotiating and offering a White House meeting but only if Zelensky would go on CNN and make an announcement up to the standard that Trump would accept (Rudy being the arbiter of that). It turns out - proven by text exchanges - that only a statement that specifically mentioned Burisma and elections investigations would earn the White House visit.
Did you not see this part of the trial?
If a person is naive enough to believe he needed help to beat Biden they probably agree with you and the other liberal Trump haters. Biden is a joke and was from day one.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
...The word for you and other Trump haters is arrogant.
I thought Trump supporters loved arrogance!
So you were trying to say that I haven’t been loving and kind? Good grief
I’m not the only arrogant one apparently. Dershowitz’s whole defense is built around Trump’s intent to get help beating Biden. Surely even Fox News and Rush have covered it. “We’re not saying he did it, but if he did, that’d be okay.”
All he’s ever been is self-preserving. It’s not arrogant to think he still is. Someone less loving and kind than me might say it’s naive to believe otherwise.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
What is the difference between the Steele Dossier and Adam Schiff?
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DONW
What is the difference between the Steele Dossier and Adam Schiff?
Nothing. Both are full of crap.