The events of the last few days have exposed the total fallacy of the Dimms' vote-by-mail scheme.
If people can get out to protest and then riot, they can also go to the polls and vote in person.
Printable View
The events of the last few days have exposed the total fallacy of the Dimms' vote-by-mail scheme.
If people can get out to protest and then riot, they can also go to the polls and vote in person.
But that would not be anarchy. It is obvious the Dems want anarchy.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDawg
Of course they do.. if not, why would a top Clinton campaign staffer, fly to Minnesota with 250K in cash to post bail for rioters who were arrested?Quote:
Originally Posted by stodgdog
🤪Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Dam straight! And the socialist/commie Dems only want anarchy!Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDawg
Hell has frozen over.. This is something that I agree with...
https://i.imgur.com/3wRTUAY.jpg
So not true! You really still believe it’s only the conservatives interested inQuote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
“the latest bond auctions or market-moving corporate news”? 🤪
It’s mainly all the super wealthy liberal Dems.
Who do you think runs the banking industry and Wall Street? You believe the socialist Dems and media propaganda spin that it’s the rich conservatives? Lol!!
If this is even remotely true, this will not end well for democrats in November.
Black Approval of Trump tops 40%
https://summit.news/2020/06/05/rasmussen-black-approval-for-trump-surges-to-over-40
I don't put much, of any, faith in polls. Even if any poll is accurate, it only reflects the ever-changing mood of those surveyed at that moment. No poll on its own is scientifically significant. To accomplish that would require an extensive, macro survey and still be dependent on both the honesty and self-awareness of the participants. If I were to be surveyed I would first assess who is asking the question, what organization, and decide HOW I wanted to respond. I WILL VOTE FOR TRUMP FOR POTUS IN 2020! But, I might respond differently on a given survey if I thought it might help Trump get reelected. I am not alone in doing this.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Still, as I said, even if a poll returns very accurate results, those same folks might have a completely different opinion tomorrow!
All anyone has to do is remember the 2016 polls that had it locked up for Krooked Killary. There were a lot of folks who did not want the pollsters to know they were voting for Trump...or more accurately, were voting against Killary.
Lol @ RasmussenQuote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Keep dreaming.
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/05/87001...e-floyds-death
Blacks by a large majority think Trump has worsened race relations and his disapproval has only grown with all demographics, including nonwhites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Maybe.. we will see.. don't believe NPR either.. they like NYT had Hillary at 93% chance of winning POTUS day before election day. Do you remember that? I remember..
Trump colluded with Russia to win.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
He's correct, and NOTHING has changed.
The last sitting POTUS reelected during a recession was William McKinley, in 1900, and then in September, 1901, in the first year of his second term he was assassinated by a known anarchist. That's an important point that needs to be explored further...and I will. But for now, focusing on a president's reelection bid, it is hard, to say the least, to win during an economic downturn. Ford, Carter, and Bush 1 all lost reelection bids during a recession. Well, in Ford's case, it wasn't a RE-election bid but he was the sitting president. In Carter's case it was more than a horrid economy that got him smashed by the great one, Ronaldo Maximus.
So, now in 2020 we have another sitting POTUS seeking reelection and right now the economy is being hammered by a series of plots all contrived and designed to wreck the economy. I posted two years ago, during one of those over-blown, fake outrages on something Trump said or tweeted, whatever it was, that it doesn't matter what rhetoric he uses, he will be reelected if the economy is roaring. The leftist globalists (anarchists) have seized every opportunity to blow everything out of proportion all designed to create economic chaos. But, prior to the plots, the economy was strong it sits poised ready to rebound. It's like trying to hold a beach ball under water! The left is trying its level best, but that sucker just wants to pop up to the surface! Any relaxation of focus, and pop! up goes the beach ball (the economy).
This morning, the resident libtard on CNBC, Andrew Sorkin, was interviewing an economist. They were discussing the current situation, the stock market, employment, etc...and the economist mentioned that Ford, Carter, and Bush Sr. all lost during a recession. Sorkin's tongue was wagging, he was giddy with excitement...had that same look my dogs have when I am cutting some chunks of filet mignon and they anticipate the treat, tails wagging, eyes wide open...and then...Bam! the economist says, "but I don't think we will be in a recession come November, so that will be a non-factor." Poor ole Sorkin, his face sunk, his giddy smile turned upside down. Guess the left will just have to get Creepy Joe elected on his own merits....good luck with that! ;)
There have been leaks of conversations on democratic conference calls that a economic recovery is their biggest fear between now and November. They know that if the economy is coming back, they have zero chance at the polls.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80