Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
champion110
I think if and when the LSUS deal is done and operating, he will retire.
With all due respect to DR, I hope you're right.
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
champion110
I think if and when the LSUS deal is done and operating, he will retire.
He was asked how much longer in the State of the U address (or whatever they called it). I think he said 2-3 more years.
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Previously it was believed he would retire as soon as his house was completed. Then it was as soon as the LSUS merger was assured. Now it's 2-3 years. The fact is he exists as the supreme potentate, surrounded by yes-men, and answers to no one. He will not retire until his health fails. It is urgent that a private committee or other mechanism is established to work on Tech's behalf outside of DR's control.
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Maybe his hemmoroids will start acting up and he'll call it quits.
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LookingForResults
It is urgent that a private committee or other mechanism is established to work on Tech's behalf outside of DR's control.
Whaddya have in mind?
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LookingForResults
Women's basketball always lost money and would have continued to choke the progress of the men's team.
Come on, man! Just when I think you've got your stuff together, you go and post something really dumb like this. I expect this type of nonsense from some of these neanderthals, but not you. If the mens BB program needs more money, GO GET IT! Stop with the stupid f&%$%@ excuses.
I've heard it all now. "The MAN" doesn't keep Tech's men's BB program down.....the LADY TECHSTERS do!!! Really? :icon_roll:
HD
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
parisdog
Maybe his hemmoroids will start acting up and he'll call it quits.
Hemorrhoids? I thought many of you thought he is a perfect @sshole!:laugh:
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
boxerdog
This is correct. Don't get me wrong, I want us to be good in every sport but the way in which wbb was prioritized in the past HURT our athletics. Ironically, I think it even hurt wbb...
WTH? You're kidding right?
LA Tech needs to be good at EVERYTHING, guys. Some of you people are still living in the 1990's. You don't realize that women's basketball is a pretty big frickin deal now. The Big XII --and the other major conferences-- know this, and have continued to invest in women's basketball. Meanwhile, you guys go the other way. :icon_roll: Do you have a clue how backwards that is?
Baylor routinely sells 10K tickets to women's basketball games and appears on TV all the time. Some of the other Big XII schools are almost as successful. When they pack 7K to 11K in for a game, that's a lot of revenue, people. You guys just haven't fiigured it out yet. As usual, some LA Tech folks will be the last to know.
HD
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HogDawg
WTH? You're kidding right?
LA Tech needs to be good at EVERYTHING, guys. Some of you people are still living in the 1990's. You don't realize that women's basketball is a pretty big frickin deal now. The Big XII --and the other major conferences-- know this, and have continued to invest in women's basketball. Meanwhile, you guys go the other way. :icon_roll: Do you have a clue how backwards that is?
Baylor routinely sells 10K tickets to women's basketball games and appears on TV all the time. Some of the other Big XII schools are almost as successful. When they pack 7K to 11K in for a game, that's a lot of revenue, people. You guys just haven't fiigured it out yet. As usual, some LA Tech folks will be the last to know.
HD
Jim Oakes stated publicly that we were the ONLY school in the country that spent more on wbb than mbb. That was stupid and he should have realized it.
WBB loses $ b/c people don't want to watch it on TV. I don't care how many ways the WNBA tries to redefine itself--nobody's interested. Apart from a select game or 2, the same can be said for college wbb...
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
HD, will you never learn not to pick a fight with a bigger dog?:laugh: First, from where did you conjure a link between the Techsters and money for men's BB? I certainly didn't make that case. The Techsters were unprofitable, but they were no more of a drag on men's BB than every other unprofitable sport offered at Tech. The point was that even when playing at the highest level, women's BB could not pay for itself.
Regarding the Techsters and their effect on men's BB, it's indisputable that Tech fans were so enamored with being relevent on a national stage, in any sport, that any success by the men on a conference level was unfairly discounted. Combined with the limited overall athletic budget, and DR's failure to understand the economic dominance of men's BB over women's BB, the result was a disproportionate emphasis on women's BB. These factors unquestionably combined to slow the progress of men's BB at Tech.
Of course, we want to strive to be outstanding in everything we do, but to say that the Big XII and other conferences know that women's BB is a big frickin' deal and that is why they continue to invest in it is laughable. They invest in it because Title IX forces them to spend a lot of money in women's sports because they make a lot of money in men's football and BB. Since they must spend this money SOMEWHERE in women's sports, they spend it in women's BB because of all the women's sports it's the most spectator friendly.
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LookingForResults
HD, will you never learn not to pick a fight with a bigger dog?:laugh: First, from where did you conjure a link between the Techsters and money for men's BB? I certUainly didn't make that case. The Techsters were unprofitable, but they were no more of a drag on men's BB than every other unprofitable sport offered at Tech. The point was that even when playing at the highest level women's BB could not pay for itself.
Regarding the Techsters and their effect on men's BB, it's indisputable that Tech fans were so enamored with being relevent on a national stage, in any sport, that any success by the men on a conference level was unfairly discounted. Combined with the limited overall athletic budget, and DR's failure to understand the economic dominance of men's BB over women's BB, the result was a disproportionate emphasis on women's BB. These factors unquestionably combined to slow the progress of men's BB at Tech.
Of course, we want to strive to be outstanding in everything we do, but to say that the Big XII and other conferences know that women's BB is a big frickin' deal and that is why they continue to invest in it is laughable. They invest in it because Title IX forces them to spend a lot of money in women's sports because they make a lot of money in men's football and BB. Since they must spend this money SOMEWHERE in women's sports, they spend it in women's BB because of all the women's sports it's the most spectator friendly.
Great post.
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HogDawg
WTH? You're kidding right?
LA Tech needs to be good at EVERYTHING, guys. Some of you people are still living in the 1990's. You don't realize that women's basketball is a pretty big frickin deal now. The Big XII --and the other major conferences-- know this, and have continued to invest in women's basketball. Meanwhile, you guys go the other way. :icon_roll: Do you have a clue how backwards that is?
Baylor routinely sells 10K tickets to women's basketball games and appears on TV all the time. Some of the other Big XII schools are almost as successful. When they pack 7K to 11K in for a game, that's a lot of revenue, people. You guys just haven't fiigured it out yet. As usual, some LA Tech folks will be the last to know.
HD
Some will never learn that one is not dependent on the other........ We need to be working toward MBB, WBB, and Football to all be as relevant on the national scene as our Lady Techsters once were. That should be the goal.
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
champion110
Some will never learn that one is not dependent on the other........ We need to be working toward MBB, WBB, and Football to all be as relevant on the national scene as our Lady Techsters once were. That should be the goal.
WBB will always be dependent upon the revenue producing sports--fb, mbb....
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LookingForResults
........because of all the women's sports it's the most spectator friendly.
I totally disagree!
Women's Volleyball is the most spectator friendly!😄
Re: Gus malzahn to ???????????????
Quote:
Originally Posted by
champion110
Some will never learn that one is not dependent on the other........ We need to be working toward MBB, WBB, and Football to all be as relevant on the national scene as our Lady Techsters once were. That should be the goal.
Yes, those sports bring in the most revenue. No one is disputing that. The fact is that the Techsters were something to be proud of on a national level and we were longing for that. We want to be that in MBB and Football, as well. Hopefully, it is coming!
It isn't a contest. It is about being the best in EVERY sport we can!