Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
You believe the 75% lie?
The average of the 4 polls is 73%. I know that Trump fan boys call that a lie...any thing negative for Trump is a lie.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
The average of the 4 polls is 73%. I know that Trump fan boys call that a lie...any thing negative for Trump is a lie.
You can make polls show anything you want them to show. The polls had Hillary beating Trump by a landslide. How did that turn out?
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
She indirectly paid a foreigner, but not a foreign government, to get opposition research, which she never used. Not REMOTELY in the same ball park. Not even a big deal.
Any mistake the FBI made in their handling of them - not on the person in the DNC that gave it to them.
You guys are supporting corruption, self dealing and cheating in elections. Just remember that you guys supported this when it becomes the norm. This was not how our country worked before, but you can be damned well sure it is open season now. And it won’t just be Trump anymore.
You are about to see what a big deal it is when your heros begin to fall farther.
Right, the DNC had no idea how currupt the Obama admin was. :icon_roll:
Washington and ESPECIALLY democrats have been corrupt. Another battle of corruption was defeated when Trump won the trial.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
The average of the 4 polls is 73%. I know that Trump fan boys call that a lie...any thing negative for Trump is a lie.
Still believing those polls that tell the lies of the leftist Trump haters I see. Here's how the question was likely asked: Do you think witnesses should be used in a trial? It should surprise you that only 73% answered yes.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
On a bright sunny day does Shifty Schiff see his shadow?
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
johnnylightnin
What’s more politically elite and swampy than using procedural wrangling to defy the will of 75% of registered voters?
Why didn’t the House release all of their evidence. We’ve never found out what the 18th witness, Atkinson’s testimony was. And what about the phony whistleblower, why did he never testify?
Trump supporters for the most part don’t respond to polls. I would’ve thought you leftists would’ve figured that out by now but I guess not.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
She indirectly paid a foreigner, but not a foreign government, to get opposition research, which she never used. Not REMOTELY in the same ball park. Not even a big deal.
Any mistake the FBI made in their handling of them - not on the person in the DNC that gave it to them.
You guys are supporting corruption, self dealing and cheating in elections. Just remember that you guys supported this when it becomes the norm. This was not how our country worked before, but you can be damned well sure it is open season now. And it won’t just be Trump anymore.
Says the Clinton supporter.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
Still believing those polls that tell the lies of the leftist Trump haters I see. Here's how the question was likely asked: Do you think witnesses should be used in a trial? It should surprise you that only 73% answered yes.
It completely undercuts your argument, but here was the question:
20. Do you think witnesses should be allowed to testify in the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump, or not?
https://poll.qu.edu/national/release...ReleaseID=3654
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
glm47
Trump supporters for the most part don’t respond to polls. I would’ve thought you leftists would’ve figured that out by now but I guess not.
Not true at all. You can see the other questions that were asked and the responses to confirm that Trump supporters were included in the poll.
Are you saying Trump supporters are too embarassed to admit it? Well that should tell you something, right?
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
I would have been okay with witnesses, ALL witnesses, testifying under oath, including Schiff, the whistleblower, the Bidens, obummer, etc... It wouldn't have mattered what Bolton or Mulvaney, or any of the so-called "star witnesses" the dizzy libs claimed they wanted to hear from had to say, Trump was going to be acquitted, period. But, the ignorant masses, Goosey and johnny included, might have actually learned the truth about their evil heroes. Of course, I bet Shifty Schiff would have pledged the 5th, and the whistleblower wouldn't have shown up, since it doesn't actually exist.
The no witness outcome is really what the dizzy dems wanted. Now they can claim it is a "fake acquittal" and offer it as a reason to flip the Senate. They are so stupidly transparent it's ridiculous. Of course our goofy resident libs are too stupid to see what is so obvious to everyone else.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
Not true at all. You can see the other questions that were asked and the responses to confirm that Trump supporters were included in the poll.
Are you saying Trump supporters are too embarassed to admit it? Well that should tell you something, right?
LOL, I know you’re not really that stupid. You’re just a die hard leftist with severe TDS.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
She indirectly paid a foreigner, but not a foreign government, to get opposition research, which she never used. Not REMOTELY in the same ball park. Not even a big deal.
Yep, paid a foreigner for RUSSIAN propaganda (and that is exactly what it was) intended to disrupt our election. Then made sure the anti-Trumpers in the right places got the misinformation to start an illegal surveillance program against an elected and sitting President, which culminated in a group of partisan and anti-Trumper "investigators" desperately - and expensively - trying to find something to attack him with. Basically, it was the DNC running their 2016 and 2020 campaigns at the cost of the American taxpayer through the bureaucracies they controlled, just like they did in 2012 with the IRS and swept under the rug by taking the 5th over and over again. No big deal at all. :icon_roll::icon_roll::icon_roll:
Even if Trump was not accomplishing all the things he said he was going to accomplish, I would STILL be pleased he won because it has exposed the corruption of the previous administration and has shown that you cannot trust politically motivated people with the kinds of power we have given our intelligence communities.
And to all the poll huggers out there.....what was the percentage of folks that wanted Obamacare when it passed? What do you suppose the percentage was that wanted a pallet of cash delivered to the Iranians to be used to kill Americans and fund Hamas (to kill Jewish folks in Israel)? Also, when was the last poll taken by these great pollsters that showed Trump in a favorable light at all? The polls taken the DAY he was elected showed him losing by double or triple digits in the EC.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Why did they need witnesses when Trump released the transcript? Anybody that read the transcript with half a brain knew there was no quid pro quo. If the republicans can get the majority in the house again, they will pass a law that that blocks the liberal left wing lunatics from trying to impeach the President on false allegations..
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DONW
Why did they need witnesses when Trump released the transcript? Anybody that read the transcript with half a brain knew there was no quid pro quo. If the republicans can get the majority in the house again, they will pass a law that that blocks the liberal left wing lunatics from trying to impeach the President on false allegations..
Lol. If you had even half a brain and read what you call a transcript you literally would have read the words “CAUTION: this memorandum is not a transcript”.
The shakedown was referenced in the call, but it was established over months of communications between Trump’s people and the Ukraine government. These communications were shown in the trial. You must have missed it.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DawgyNWindow
Yep, paid a foreigner for RUSSIAN propaganda (and that is exactly what it was) intended to disrupt our election. Then made sure the anti-Trumpers in the right places got the misinformation to start an illegal surveillance program against an elected and sitting President, which culminated in a group of partisan and anti-Trumper "investigators" desperately - and expensively - trying to find something to attack him with. Basically, it was the DNC running their 2016 and 2020 campaigns at the cost of the American taxpayer through the bureaucracies they controlled, just like they did in 2012 with the IRS and swept under the rug by taking the 5th over and over again. No big deal at all. :icon_roll::icon_roll::icon_roll:
Even if Trump was not accomplishing all the things he said he was going to accomplish, I would STILL be pleased he won because it has exposed the corruption of the previous administration and has shown that you cannot trust politically motivated people with the kinds of power we have given our intelligence communities.
And to all the poll huggers out there.....what was the percentage of folks that wanted Obamacare when it passed? What do you suppose the percentage was that wanted a pallet of cash delivered to the Iranians to be used to kill Americans and fund Hamas (to kill Jewish folks in Israel)? Also, when was the last poll taken by these great pollsters that showed Trump in a favorable light at all? The polls taken the DAY he was elected showed him losing by double or triple digits in the EC.
Take the tinfoil hat off, dude.
Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Guisslapp
Take the tinfoil hat off, dude.
Nothing untrue in my post at all. Your delusion is rooted your TDS.