Is your gal Krooked Killary that savior we are looking for?
Printable View
I'm not arguing the point, because I don't know this answer. But, is Trump changing the source of the money? By that I mean, is it NEW money to DC and thus outside of the entrenched establishment? If yes, then it might not be a bad thing. We all know it takes money to drive change in national politics. "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"
No major liabilities? Ya mean like:
1. socialism
2. socialism
3. socialism
And as a bonus:
1. selling out our foreign policy to the highest bidder
2. obummercare, er, worse, killarycare
3. the Krooked Klinton Foundation scam
4. absolute hatred for our military service men & women
5. absolute hatred for law enforcement
6. absolute disdain for Christianity (you like that one!)
7. absolute disdain for anything righteous and good (see #6)
8. open borders
9. she is a big fan of the Dallas Cowgirls (egad!)
10. never saw a tax she didn't like
etc....
No thanks. I'll take my chances with Trump.
I keep thinking you're phone is autocorrecting border to boarder. But now I think it is intentional and a better description.
A slight majority.
But, Trump earned enough votes to win the election via electorial college.
Therefore, justifying your personal hate by attributing some personality disorder and calling the voters that did vote for him fools is a personality disorder itself.
Bill Clinton was elected with just 43% of the vote, but HE WAS ELECTED. Were the other 57% fools? Or were the 43% fools? OR, and this is a big OR, did enough people have him as their choice and were satisfied with their vote?
That slight majority still puts the voice of American voters as being against Trump.
Maybe. But I think you've read it wrong.
19.54% certainly were.
The worst people come up with against Clinton is him getting a blowjob in the White House by an intern despite being a "happily" married man. Well, until lately with the whole social justice angle that has permeated through the left.