Presidential Election 2020

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4caKG8W0AAg9Xx.jpg:large

So true.

Democrats cling to the Russia probe because it's all they've got

By Liz Peek

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS

So true.

Democrats cling to the Russia probe because it's all they've got

By Liz Peek

---

Or the “rule of law” is still important to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS

So true.

Democrats cling to the Russia probe because it's all they've got

By Liz Peek

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Or the “rule of law” is still important to them.

---

That will never be the case as much past and recent history proves that are not
concerned about the “rule of law”. And if you need to ask the history I speak, then you are not replying in honesty or even honestly participating.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS

That will never be the case as much past and recent history proves that are not
concerned about the “rule of law”. And if you need to ask the history I speak, then you are not replying in honesty or even honestly participating.

---

If “hypocrisy” is how we are to judge these things, then Republicans really can’t talk about the “rule of law” anymore either. Apparently, they only care about it when they can cite it against the Dems.

TWO YEARS! $35 million 2800+ witnesses interviewed in a witch hunt, etc.. no violation of the law found.

Meanwhile, we have documented proof of dems breaking "the rule of law."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

If “hypocrisy” is how we are to judge these things, then Republicans really can’t talk about the “rule of law” anymore either. Apparently, they only care about it when they can cite it against the Dems.

---

Not true in the bigger historic picture as you are shaded by your current bias and hatred for Trump. But we do know that Trump, at least IMHO, hasn't broken any rule of law at this point. I think you will also find this out soon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

TWO YEARS! $35 million 2800+ witnesses interviewed in a witch hunt, etc.. no violation of the law found.

Meanwhile, we have documented proof of dems breaking "the rule of law."

---

Lots of people charged and convicted because of this. Evidence of violation of law (obstruction) against Trump was also provided, but the special counsel turfed the decision to “charge” to Congress. The Congressional republicans don’t do their job, that is on them.

Trump wastes at least that much of the taxpayer’s money on his personal golfing every year, btw.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

two years! $35 million 2800+ witnesses interviewed in a witch hunt, etc.. No violation of the law found.

Meanwhile, we have documented proof of dems breaking "the rule of law."

---

truth!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Lots of people charged and convicted because of this. Evidence of violation of law (obstruction) against Trump was also provided, but the special counsel turfed the decision to “charge” to Congress. The Congressional republicans don’t do their job, that is on them.

Trump wastes at least that much of the taxpayer’s money on his personal golfing every year, btw.

---

What evidence? Firing Comey is not evidence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Lots of people charged and convicted because of this. Evidence of violation of law (obstruction) against Trump was also provided, but the special counsel turfed the decision to “charge” to Congress. The Congressional republicans don’t do their job, that is on them.

Trump wastes at least that much of the taxpayer’s money on his personal golfing every year, btw.

---

You're beginning to sound as desperate as Elijah Cummings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dawg80

TWO YEARS! $35 million 2800+ witnesses interviewed in a witch hunt, etc.. no violation of the law found.

Meanwhile, we have documented proof of dems breaking "the rule of law."

---

And they want more. Doesn't make much sense that this prolonged investigation needs more investigation. I would rather an investigation be done of the folks that support further investigation of that already investigated. Gets confusing

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guisslapp

Lots of people charged and convicted because of this. Evidence of violation of law (obstruction) against Trump was also provided, but the special counsel turfed the decision to “charge” to Congress. The Congressional republicans don’t do their job, that is on them.

Trump wastes at least that much of the taxpayer’s money on his personal golfing every year, btw.

---

Not disagreeing with you on the golf thing, but Obama's extensive vacation time was not an issue. At least Trump doesn't have to pay a greens fee or cart rental when he is golfing on his own property.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FriscoDog

What evidence? Firing Comey is not evidence.

---

Read the report - there were 11 instances of obstruction given by Mueller. The most egregious was probably directing McGahn to fire Mueller. That is an “endeavor to obstruct” an investigation if there ever has been one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stodgdog

And they want more. Doesn't make much sense that this prolonged investigation needs more investigation. I would rather an investigation be done of the folks that support further investigation of that already investigated. Gets confusing

---

Mueller report basically provided a road map for further investigation. He teed up impeachment if Congressional republicans are willing to do their job.