How is this newsworthy?
Printable View
How is this newsworthy?
Good point! Yeah, how is obummer and Biden committing criminal acts "news"? The sun rises in the east...Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
What was the crime?Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
This is one of those trick questions, ain't it! You ole dog you. Almost got me to take the bait.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I guess it is a trick to get you to acknowledge that you don’t actually know of any crimes that were committed.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
Only idiots believed in a Russian collusion.
Rosenstein admits: Mueller had no evidence of collusion early in probe
https://www.wnd.com/2020/06/4826458/
Goosey believed it...and still does.
Ted Cruse had Rod R. admit yesterday that emails were changed in order to "create evidence". Even a non legal layperson could understand that fabricating evidence is illegal.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
That is not a crime in Goosey's demented world....not when it serves the purpose to damage the bad "Orange Man!" The end justifies the means.Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
Graham: "The whole concept, that the campaign was colluding with the Russians, there was no 'there' there in August of 2017, do you agree or not?"Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
“I agree with the general statement.” - Rosenstein.
An odd answer, probably owing to the fact that “collusion” itself is an ambiguous term not having a legal definition. Obviously what Rosenstein is saying is that there wasn’t proof of a criminal conspiracy at the time.
Of course, if the FBI has proof of a criminal act at the time, you could have just skipped the investigation.
What we do know:
Trump wanted help.
Trump solicited help.
Trump got the help he solicited.
Trump new in advance that the help he wanted was coming.
Now, was there proof that Trump and Russia reached an agreement vs. both parties acting unilaterally in their own interest? That evidence wasn’t produced, but we know there was an effort to establish back channel communications.
And wasn’t that lawyer fired and under criminal investigation for that?Quote:
Originally Posted by FriscoDog
I am glad I took Goosey off of ignore...he offers so many chuckles.
You don’t get tired of the “my dad can run faster than your dad!” Argument? I have been for some time.
Update
Published 9 hours ago
Barr appoints John Durham as special counsel to investigate origins of Russia probe
Barr appointed Durham as special counsel on Oct. 19--before Election Day
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bar...f-russia-probe
Shifty Schiff says a new AD (presumably under a Harris-Biden admin) will just fire Durham. Hmmm....wasn't he one of those screaming "obstruction of justice" when Trump muttered once, out of frustration, that maybe he should fire Mueller! Now, Shifty Schiff just says matter-of-factly, no big deal, "they" will just fire Durham.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS