When was the last time she was seen? Is she coming back? Haven’t seen anything about it on the news cycle, although I might watch the news 15 minutes a week.
Printable View
When was the last time she was seen? Is she coming back? Haven’t seen anything about it on the news cycle, although I might watch the news 15 minutes a week.
I think she's very, very ill. The Democrats will do everything they can to postpone her having to leave the Supreme Court, and I'm not a bit surprised. There's not an ounce of honor left in the entire Democrat Party anymore.
If RBG had an ounce of honor and integrity, she'd have already retired due to her health issues. I'm not so sure she's not mentally incapacitated at this point. I suppose she can prove me wrong if she shows up at the capitol Tuesday night.
Working from home. They expect her back sonetime this month.
If RBG passed away the libs would tie her to a board and prop her up claiming, "Oh no, she ain't dead, she's just resting." And then add, "and will continue resting until we have a commie POTUS."
Reminds me of the Dead Parrot skit by Monty Pythion.
Weekend at Bernie'sQuote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
https://theracingdiaries.files.wordp...s-590x3501.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...zyOVnoN-0CbEow
Well well. Glad she's back for a while.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg makes public appearance, first since surgery
Cases of lung cancer like RBG's are often the result of metastatic cancer. If this is true in her case, then she's not long for this world. If not, she may outlive Trump's first term.
I find it hard to believe that she’s walking a mile a day after having half of her left lung removed.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Not so hard to believe...she was running 5Ks prior to losing half a lung.Quote:
Originally Posted by SicemDawgz
Oh now I understand.
'No photos' of Ruth Ginsburg's 'public appearance'
'I won't believe the likes of the Washington Post!'
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Ginsburg has promised to retire when she can no long work at “full steam.”
For the past six weeks or so, following surgery, she’s been working from home, according to the court.On Monday, however, she reportedly attended a concert put on by her daughter-in-law at the National Museum of Women in the Arts.
But the American Mirror blog points out that in the age of digital cameras, no one apparently has documented her public appearance.
“Attendees at the Notorious RBG in Song described Ginsburg as ‘glam,’ and ‘resplendent,’ and ‘magnificent,’ but you’ll have to take their word for it,” the blog said. “In an era when every person is carrying a camera and isn’t afraid to use it, there wasn’t a single snap of the 85-year-old to be found. Every media story that covered her alleged appearance used file photos.”
One confirmation of her appearance was a tweet by Washington Post contributor David Hagedorn that later was deleted.
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/02/no-photo...k0ECYO5AkFA.99
“She’s alive. And in perfect hibernation.”
Supreme Court has announced RBG has passed away.
2020 sucks
Only if Trump loses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
😁
Published 2 hours ago
CNN's Jeffery Toobin: Democrats 'wimps,' might not have 'guts' to battle GOP over Supreme Court vacancy
'There is a difference to how Democrats and Republicans go about these fights,' Toobin said
More
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-je...k-suprme-court
I dislike Maher but he might speak the truth on this one.
Published 35 mins ago
Bill Maher says Ruth Bader Ginsburg 'should've quit' under Obama: She didn't 'take the hint'
Maher knocked the Democrats for having their SCOTUS plan be 'Ruth Bader Ginsburg doesn't die'
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...-take-the-hintQuote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
RBG was absolutely against "packing the court." In a fairly recent interview she expressed that opinion. So, since we are supposed to adhere to her "dying wishes" the Dems better not try it.
Barrett has gotten RBG's office...hope it was properly fumigated and scrubbed with disinfectant first.
You guys are confused. Ah independent judiciary was the point all along. You don’t want any judge taking directions from a party or Congress. Similarly, Confess ahoy don’t be taking direction in the size of the bench from judges.
Is there a typo in there?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Yup. “Congress shouldn’t be taking”. Really weird autocorrect.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
I love me some Confess Ahoys, they are chock full of confess.Quote:
Originally Posted by dawg80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
But it's okay for Congress (the Senate) to bow to "the dying wishes of old Ruthie"? That's what the Dems say. To hell with the Constitution, and precedent...29 times in history presidents nominated a SC justice in an election year...and the Senate was supposed to adhere to Ruthie's "dying wish" that she wanted the "next" president to fill her seat. And, as mentioned, she also said she thinks the SC should stay at 9.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
I suppose we get to choose which "dying wish" we like, eh.
So why do the liberal SC judges march in lockstep to the Dem congressional wishes?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
The conservative ones vote liberal a lot and against the GOP desires.
They don’t. You should especially look at Elena Kagan’s judicial record.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS