Printable View
Go get him guys!!!!! IGore along with his partners in crime need to be seeing "striped sunshine "
link
SENATOR CALLS FOR 'CRIMINAL' GLOBAL WARMING INVESTIGATION; WANTS GORE RECALLED TO EXPLAIN PRIOR TESTIMONY...
More
Climategate Meets the Law: Senator Inhofe To Ask for DOJ Investigation
|http://beforeitsnews.com/story/19764...stigation.html
pertinent quoteQuote:
[The] Minority Staff of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works believe the scientists involved may have violated fundamental ethical principles governing taxpayer-funded research and, in some cases, federal laws. In addition to these findings, we believe the emails and accompanying documents seriously compromise the IPCC -backed “consensus” and its central conclusion that anthropogenic emissions are inexorably leading to environmental catastrophes.
.Quote:
Since the Climategate Files were released, the IPCC has been forced to retract a number of specific conclusions — such as a prediction that Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035 — and has been forced to confirm that the report was based in large part on reports from environmental activist groups instead of peer-reviewed scientific literature. Dr. Murari Lal, an editor of the IPCC AR4 report, admitted to the London Daily Mail that he had known the 2035 date was false, but was included in the report anyway “purely to put political pressure on world leaders.”
I worry that the senate and congress have waited too long and that Gore will have destroyed evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by FishingBack
It's a pretty basic scam, they just liked an issue too big to go unnoticed.
Truely one of the all time near greatest scams pulled on the folks continues to unravel before our eyes. Where are the investigative journalist hiding, shame on them and gore all their illk and the hustlers trying to monetize the manmade global fooling scam.
How's the quote go..."Make a lie big enough and say it enough times, people will believe it..." or something to that effect.
I hope this whole things comes crashing down!
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/webdata...2_data_mlo.png
Won't be long before we are over 400 ppm.
I've got charts, too...
http://www.enemyplanet.com/fark/meme...hart_thumb.jpg
And a 60ppm increase over a period of 50 years? How much is that, exactly?
Can't you see that you graph has the line scratched out as if to say it is in error.Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Let's say that it is a 15% increase which represents an incredible rate of change. Of course you realize that the rate at which the world is dumpting CO2 into the atmosphere is INCREASING every year so we can expect the rate of increase for the next 50 years to be much higher if no action is taken to control CO2 emissions.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildawg
Has the CIA done any studies on AGW?
Don't forget we are deforesting the land so there is less CO2 removed as time goes on.Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
At this rate, Al Gore said we'd burst into flame any second.
So how have CO2 levels increased in proportion to global population growth over that 50-year period?Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Yes, the CIA has a whole group dedicated to global warming. It is located right next to our folks who track the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, and smart liberals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
all you need for evidence is the man himself. Lock him up guys!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by FishingBack
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: You have to love the line scratched out. What better evidence that Salty doesn't read for comprehension or undertstand science!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
And throw away the keys.Quote:
Originally Posted by techman05
Is salty really trying to use false evidence again to prove a non-existent point. You can't use evidence that your main supporter and head honcho just admitted, along with the scientist, is false and misleading. Come on man. Bring me something fresh from a completely unbiased source. Wait, I guess you can't do that. The conservatives won't waste time and money researching something that just ain't happnin. The Libs can't be trusted. There is no one else to fund the research. Just let it die already.
I think thete is legitmate research that can be done to deal with the human species adapting to changes onnour planet. There's also legitimate research in finding new fuels and such. But this global earmng climate change research is bogus. We shouldn't punish the legitimate research because of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by techman05
Tyler, you are once again mistaken. I know, it happens all the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
The red line shows the seasonal variations in atmospheric co2.
And you call yourself a scientist. :bigcry::bigcry::bigcry:
Where is the link to the page the graph is on???Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Anyone see Bill Nye "The Science Guy" (believes in anthropogenic global warming) debate with Joe Bastardi (Accuweather - doesn't believe in global warming) on the O'Reilly Factor last night?
Bill Nye has now lost all credibility with me.....
Nye brought up Venus as a comparison - LOL. Venus has more than 98% CO2 in the atmosphere and over 100 times total atmosphere of earth.Quote:
Originally Posted by TechDynamic
We measure CO2 on earth in parts per million. That's about .0003 volume or .03% While venus is almost totally CO2 with much much more atmosphere volume.
Crazy talk, Mr. Nye.
Right click on the image. Then click properties.Quote:
Originally Posted by JuBru
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Can't do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Just provide the page link.
try thisQuote:
Originally Posted by JuBru
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/
Well, at least your sense of humor is intact.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
You could have just posted this link:
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
The problem with that graph is not "scratched out"...
It's a problem of scaling. Show the data over the past 200 or 300 years, but you can't.
Secondly, and most importantly, correlation is not causality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
I'm laughing at you my friend. :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by atobulldog
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
No, the problem is probably both.Quote:
Originally Posted by LATechBanjo
IT'S A VOLCANO!!!!!!!! They spew CO2.
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: Like I stated; "What better evidence that Salty doesn't read for comprehension or understand science!!!!!!!"
link
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=...48890d3c90c6fc
And then this
Mauna Loa Volcanic Carbon Dioxide Emmissions 1958-2001 - NOAA ...
The MLO CO2 emissions record (1995 and 2001 papers) is an important component in the "geophysical picture" of how Mauna Loa volcano works. ...
www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/obop/mlo/.../volcanicco2/volcanicco2.html - Cached
Why are they taking CO2 readings over the largest volcano on Earth?Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
I see I should have read the whole thread first.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
It's the water vapor along with natural solar cycles. Even if it could be controlled (which it can't be), the left-wingnut loon fringe is going after the wrong things.
And the answer is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Because liberal idiots didn't think anyone would notice.
They are monitoring CO2 emissions at Mauna Loa to see if there is a correlation between emissions and eruptions. That data gathering has nothing to do with global warming and any use of that data for that purpose is fallacious.
At night a temperature inversion forms near the ground, trapping volcanic emissions coming from Mauna Loa summit fumarloes in a layer tens of meters thick. Down slope winds sometimes transport these emissions to the observatory, where they are detected as a "noisy" increase above smooth baseline levels for some gases. A volcanic component can be estimated by taking the difference in concentration between periods when the plume is present and periods immediately before and after that exhibit baseline conditions. The most significant volcanic gas is CO2, which has been monitored since 1958 through three eruption cycles Volcanic CO2 is greatest shortly after an eruption and then decreases exponentially over the subsequent years. Right after the 1984 eruption, Mauna Loa emitted as much CO2 as an American city of 40,000 people. By 2005, these emissions had fallen by a factor of about 100. This suggests that a reservoir deep beneath the summit is recharged with fresh, CO2 rich magma during and immediately following an eruption which is then quiescently outgassed at an inverse-exponential rate. There were substantial emissions of SO2 and aerosols following the 1975 eruption and much lower levels were seen after the 1984 eruption. By 2000, SO2 and aerosol emissions from Mauna Loa had fallen below detection limits. The CO2 and SO2 data is examined weekly for any significant events which may signal renewed activity in the volcano. The long-term records are updated yearly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guisslapp
Any questions?
So you come on here trying to pass this off as evidence of "dangerous levels of CO2" in the atmosphere, and now you're playing if off as though you knew it was only being measured around the volcano? Do you even realize how idiotic you look for posting this nonsense in an effort to support the global warming farce? This sort of crap is exactly why everyone thinks people like you are crackpots... putting aside the fact that you are, this is just one more piece of evidence that you--along with Al Bore and others--are snake oil salesmen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mildawg
Here Here!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
You're as deceitfully slippery and evil as IGore and the rest of the lying libs you support. You should be banned from BB&B for trying to pull your BS factoid off as supporting data. You are now on ignore.Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
OK..that was a pretty good catch of a lying lib if I say so myself. Then again, liberals are easy to catch spinning deceit for all to see. Salty is back on ignore.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildawg
I've never taken him off ignore, but just like a bad car accident I find myself fighting the urge to peek every once and a while. Good catch on the volcano thing. I never even put 2 and 2 together.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Tyler, you certainly are proving the old adage that ignorance is bliss. :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
What's really funny, Tyler, is that YOU are the one that originally posted the link. I merely read YOUR link and posted the pertinent part. :icon_wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Knowing that you and mildawg have put me back on ignore for the 145th time has really ruined my day. :D
100% wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by LookingForResults
Did you actually graduate from an accredited college? CO2 levels are being measured all around the world not just from the top of an Hawaiian volcano.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildawg
Salty's attempt at deception was truly sad. I wish I could see his backtracking as it will be just as amazing, slippery and sad I'm sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by mildawg
Remember, it was you who posted that article. I merely read it and toss it back to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
You definitely not going to be in the running for the Good Sportsman of the Year Award. :D
Might as well as mass murder charges to the entire environmental movement.
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives...e-green-death/
I personally think that global warming is a crock of crap, especially after experiencing one of the worst and longest winters I have experienced in years and years. I believe Al Gore and Obama will do anything to try and screw the great citizens of this country out of any money they can. I don't believe anything these two say, they have proved themselves to be habitual liars.