Re: 2016 Election Results
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brtransplant
Says he who believes CNN still has an ounce of credibility. Tell me, are you OK with a law that allows non residents of New Hampshire to vote in that state? Do you not think that a law like that is a threat to our democracy?
Sure it is fine as long as the law is like New Hampshire's and requires that you only have one voting domicile. I don't think any state would block you from moving into that state for the sole purpose of voting in that state. Anyone can voting forum shop today if it is that important to you.
Re: 2016 Election Results
Big Three Networks skip Donna Brazile bombshell that DNC was rigged for Clinton
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...r-clinton.html
Re: 2016 Election Results
First, let's be clear about something, ALL political parties are private organizations and as such, can do what they want (within the laws of our country (and states)) in choosing their candidate. Only the two biggest parties hold nationwide primaries. All the others elect (select) their candidates at closed conventions or caucuses. Both the Repubs and the democraps could choose their candidate(s) the same way, or in some other way. So, if the 'craps wanted Krooked Killary as their 2016 presidential candidate, they could have skipped all the primaries and just named her. Again, political parties are PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS.
Of course, that said, if you are going to hold primaries and act like the process is fair....it should be.
It is not surprising that the libtard media is playing this down. We all know if this had been the Repub Party involved in this scandal, CBS et al would have interrupted regular programing with the breaking news, and then convened a 12-member panel of talking libtard heads to all say the same thing, the Repub Party should be disbanded!
But, the fact that Krooked Killary is at the center of another scandal....well, actually, I kind of see CBS's point....this ain't news!
Re: 2016 Election Results