Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gooddawg
I know of three it has come into play with. None of them are here any longer. Two of those were under Dykes. There is a reason Holtz wants contracts for his assistant coaches and that reason is the assistants want them.
Also, multi-year contracts are becoming a thing for coordinators so maybe he wants that for some of his guys.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
So we lost them because they didn't have one year contracts? My original question to you was how do the one year contracts help? Seriously...explain. You don't have to use a name, just give an example of how it might help us keep a coach.
Gooddawg can't name names because he's making this crap up.
Here's the Dykes era coaching staff...
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
HC |
Dykes |
Dykes |
Dykes |
OC |
Franklin |
Franklin |
Franklin |
DC |
Spangler |
Spangler |
Spangler |
WR |
Likens |
Likens |
Likens |
DL |
Eggen |
Eggen |
Eggen |
RB |
Ingram |
Ingram |
Ingram |
LB |
Koonz |
Koonz |
Koonz |
CB |
Curtis |
Curtis |
Curtis |
OL |
Perot |
Perot |
Perot |
ST/IR |
Tommerdahl |
Tommerdahl |
Tommerdahl |
S&C |
Harrington |
Harrington |
Harrington |
Same 11 coaches on staff all 3 years with only the HC under contract.
Not a single assistant left under Dykes.
Spangler turned down the DC job at Washington State to stay at Tech without a contract, and I'm sure our other assistants had promotion offers to leave, too.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dawg06
Gooddawg can't name names because he's making this crap up.
Here's the Dykes era coaching staff...
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
HC |
Dykes |
Dykes |
Dykes |
OC |
Franklin |
Franklin |
Franklin |
DC |
Spangler |
Spangler |
Spangler |
WR |
Likens |
Likens |
Likens |
DL |
Eggen |
Eggen |
Eggen |
RB |
Ingram |
Ingram |
Ingram |
LB |
Koonz |
Koonz |
Koonz |
CB |
Curtis |
Curtis |
Curtis |
OL |
Perot |
Perot |
Perot |
ST/IR |
Tommerdahl |
Tommerdahl |
Tommerdahl |
S&C |
Harrington |
Harrington |
Harrington |
Same 11 coaches on staff all 3 years with only the HC under contract.
Not a single assistant left under Dykes.
Spangler turned down the DC job at Washington State to stay at Tech without a contract, and I'm sure our other assistants had promotion offers to leave, too.
In retrospect, I wish Spangler would have taken that WashSt. job, I imagine 2012 was a bad blemish on his record, and 2011 was the high point of his career. I still think he was a good DC, but his defense got submitted to the TexasTech treatment all season...
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HogDawg
Go back and reread post #26. I said there might be a few exceptions, and I specifically named Tim Rattay as one. Again...it's about DEMAND. If a coach is in high demand you may consider putting them under contract.
Quote blindness.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bearpaw
In retrospect, I wish Spangler would have taken that WashSt. job, I imagine 2012 was a bad blemish on his record, and 2011 was the high point of his career. I still think he was a good DC, but his defense got submitted to the TexasTech treatment all season...
Yea he is an example of why coaches should jump at the better offers. You are one year away from the end of your career.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
touchdown123
Yea he is an example of why coaches should jump at the better offers. You are one year away from the end of your career.
Spangler's career didn't end. He's the head coach at Presby now.
http://www.gobluehose.com/ViewArticl...CLID=206564260
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HogDawg
Good for him, glad to see him land on his feet :)
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HogDawg
Gone back to where we got him from.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
I never said we lost them because they were not on contract just that it was an issue with them. They wanted contracts, that is all I can say. Maybe they didn't want them to run from June to July, but they wanted contracts and I understand that. It's not too hard to figure out. If you get hired in June and fired in December without a contract you don't get paid in January or until you find another job. I guess I was giving you guys too much credit...
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gooddawg
I never said we lost them because they were not on contract just that it was an issue with them. They wanted contracts, that is all I can say. Maybe they didn't want them to run from June to July, but they wanted contracts and I understand that. It's not too hard to figure out. If you get hired in June and fired in December without a contract you don't get paid in January or until you find another job. I guess I was giving you guys too much credit...
I suppose Manny Diaz would have appreciated one, especially after his mid-year treatment by Texas...
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
I am not sure what your point is. I assume Diaz had a contract with Texas and was paid by them whatever he was owed.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gooddawg
I am not sure what your point is. I assume Diaz had a contract with Texas and was paid by them whatever he was owed.
Well I assume a contract decreases the chance you will be fired mid-year like Texas did to him. If he was paid for the firing, then I'm sure that had something to do with the contract.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gooddawg
I never said we lost them because they were not on contract just that it was an issue with them. They wanted contracts, that is all I can say. Maybe they didn't want them to run from June to July, but they wanted contracts and I understand that. It's not too hard to figure out. If you get hired in June and fired in December without a contract you don't get paid in January or until you find another job. I guess I was giving you guys too much credit...
We never lost a coach during the years you referenced other than S&C. That must be your source
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PawDawg
We never lost a coach during the years you referenced other than S&C. That must be your source
We didn't even lose our S&C coach during those years.
During the Dykes/Holtz era (last 7+ years)...
- Tech has not fired a single football coach.
- Not a single assistant left for a lateral or lesser job.
- Nobody left during Dykes era.
- Assistants who left under Holtz either moved up in conference or took a promotion to HC or OC at lower conference.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bearpaw
In retrospect, I wish Spangler would have taken that WashSt. job, I imagine 2012 was a bad blemish on his record, and 2011 was the high point of his career. I still think he was a good DC, but his defense got submitted to the TexasTech treatment all season...
If he had gone to WSU, his defenses would have been subjected to the "Texas Tech treatment" as well. Leach is even more pass happy than Dykes.
I assume his 2011 success while coordinating across from an Air Raid attack is what would have appealed to Leach to begin with.
Re: Holtz's New Contract Done
Quote:
Originally Posted by
inudesu
If he had gone to WSU, his defenses would have been subjected to the "Texas Tech treatment" as well. Leach is even more pass happy than Dykes.
I assume his 2011 success while coordinating across from an Ari Raid attack is what would have appealed to Leach to begin with.
True, but he probably would have left that program with a bit more cash. But you are correct