Search:

i don't think i can think of an "honest" sentence that uses the phrase "mother nature" seriously.

i'm inclined to agree with you, but it wasn't safe 108 years ago, either.
http://www.1900storm.com/

more likely because they are politicians and sense that most voters have been sucked in to the cgw.

come on, dogtor, everyone knows it's absurd to think that the sun could be responsible for global warming.

so what are the adverse affects of locally high co2 levels?

that says it all, right there.

:icon_roll:

i'm sure it has something to do with co2 and the republicans.

yeah, i think it's kinda the same, only different...

so what's new?

sounds like we are trying to create a real environmental calamity in an effort to prevent an imaginary one. :icon_roll:

not a clue, but i'm sure they take a lot of energy. and the energy will probably be produced by burning fossil fuels.

not to me. spending billions of (taxpayer) dollars to suck plant food out of the atmosphere doesn't make sense. and producing the energy required to run these machines will create more REAL...

now THIS sounds promising.
i want to do some more research to see how durable these things are. if they have a reasonable life, we need to start roofing houses with them, insetting them in the...

talk about a waste of money.

so do myths and folklore. the difference is that science concentrates on what can be observed or logically derived from what is observed.

perhaps you mean beyond our universe? if you believe the big bang, like most scientists, then there is nothing we can know scientifically outside the universe. without matter, there is no space;...

how many times on this very thread have we been warned about runaway greenhouse effect? anyone?

this is great news! so what are you and altadawg so worried about?

there won't be any vindication as long as warmists are using tornadoes as proof. :icon_roll:

in fact, i don't expect any vindication in my lifetime. warmists have hedged their bets sufficiently...

so, just to be clear, you think that it is unhealthy to breathe co2 in concentrations less than 0.1%?

well, the world's foremost experts on air pollution have spoken. it is now settled.

pretty much sums up global warming science.

do you think that the waters around the u.s. have special properties that make the wind-shear they create more disruptive to hurricanes than in other parts of the world?

the surface water temperature obviously influences the strength of a hurricane. the problem is that you are only looking at one piece of the physics of hurricanes. the fact is there are so many...

read your own article. i'm getting tired of this. it may be time to bring back the silent bob avatar.