Search:

I think we can all agree that global cooling would be much worse.

Actually, I was suggesting that you are another victim.

n/m. I found it.

http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press/press-releases/58/bob-barr-statement-after-attending-fmr-vp-al-gores-we-campaign-event/

Really? Do you have a link?



Because they are not scientists and have been manipulated by CGW zealots just like many citizens such as yourself.

Yeah, and to think that so many Republican hard-legs want to encourage this type of behavior from their party leads me to believe that we will be getting more of the same (and worse) in the future.

Is it just me or has the CGW been unusually silent lately?

Because no one cares about the work that people in the natural sciences do unless they can convince people there is an impending catastrophe. That is the ONLY reason this Ice Age/Global...

Increased inbreeding.

The cool weather has been nice this summer. A big thank you to all of you driving Priui.

Government regulations generally do.

For the Swiss Patent Office. And it sort of illustrates my point, anyway. People look for government jobs when they cannot find private employment. Einstein worked for the Swiss Patent Office...

Are you saying that scientists that work for the government and make less money are more likely to be correct than scientists that have been successful working in private industries where there is...

What he said.

I am sure we would define it based on our measurement standards (which are based on the significant characteristics of things that occur on our planet).

If the Big Bang created time, time could still extend in the positive direction to infinity unless it is terminated by a collapsing of the Universe (like a reverse Big Bang).

If the Big Bang created time, then there is no before.

Why not?

I am sure McCain is qualified to opine on what the "scientific consensus" is.

"Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?"

Wind shear reduces the intensity of hurricanes.

"Going forth and multiplying" is not exactly environmentally responsible.

Doh!

Sometimes things that are over your head actually seem stupid. Maybe it is you who lacks the mental ability to understand the paradox. Your argument that

(1) there will be a future generation of...

How can we even represent to know what is in the best interest of these people. My assumption is that they would rather be born and live in a world of warming than to never exist. Whose best interest...

It is definitely an unconventional argument. But it was the argument he was trying to draw people into. I think it is a moral argument worthy of discussion.

Randy clearly showed the philisophical problem with giving moral weight to future un-conceived generations. If you are too dense to realize that, maybe you should become a democrap.

Here is...