Guisslapp may disagree, but traditional marriage is a negative right. Anything outside of traditional marriage is a positive right.
Y'all have fun sorting this out.
Type: Posts; User: PawDawg; Keyword(s):
Guisslapp may disagree, but traditional marriage is a negative right. Anything outside of traditional marriage is a positive right.
Y'all have fun sorting this out.
Got to have a set of moral standards to go by. It's not a moving target.:icon_razz:
Not sure how that makes gay, lesbian, non-monogamous, or those sure to come later okay, but like I said, no moral absolutes are sure to help.
Moral absolutes don't matter?
Since you are okay with non-monogamy, I can only imagine what the next step might be.:icon_razz:
So three or four folks getting married to each other is okay?
[QUOTE=champion110;1409095]Ray,
I AM RUNNING THE PROGRAM for 74 Counties in Texas. I know the demographics that are signing up. Nationally, it is a problem, but not here. Sorry, I have the stats....
No national numbers because it is such a low percentage. Everything is always bigger in Texas, including BS.
My stats may not be scientific, but as I said, 90% are sick...
Young people aren't going to buy this crap. They's be STUPID to buy it. They can still go to the ER and come out much cheaper.
A...
90% of them are sick and otherwise uninsurable. They are coming back in droves. The sytem is still broken. I try to sign people up everyday.
So what are you cleaning up and why? I call BS on thousands signing up. Becoming a liberal talking point doesn't make it true. Should be 100s of 1000s signing up.
Bullshit! People still can get coverage. It's STILL a cluster. You can't clean this corruption up.
Your people are selling personal information to 3rd parties who are taking advantage of...
Sheeple vote in the people who have been holding them back for 50 years. Libtards ignore the obvious and blame the productive citizens. It's a vicious cycle.
As you obviously know there is a pretty good list of them in Hebrews.
Well according to Champion110, y'all are not interpreting the Bible correctly. Jesus didn't mean that when he said it, and whatever Paul said can only be taken as the reader chooses to take it.
Protestants believe the KJ version of Bible for the most part. Catholics have a extra book or two. No picking and choosing. Interpretations vary, but the basic tenets are the same. Champion110...
I've been asking for examples for years, but you still can't come back with any. Typical liberal comeback when cornered...talk in circles.
No, you pick and choose the parts of the Gospel you want to believe. Don't talk about context unless you are prepared to back that up with facts instead of opinion. Examples? I didn't think so...
I don't take the Bible all literally, but I do read it and take the whole message in. It is one of those historical documents that can help lead us in the right direction, as long was we don't think...
Yes, this it the video we were discussing. Satire. Old news.
Old Satire. He has been consistent with this satirical message for YEARS. Open your mind instead of being so judgmental.
sat·ire
ˈsaˌtīr/
noun
noun: satire
1.
the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary ...
"The cause" is important. No big secret that Jackson and Sharpton requested payments to their "non profit" orgs to shut up.
The Phil Robertson deal is an example of the uncontrolled market speaking. Chick Fil A is another example.
Pretty much anything associated with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are examples of...
I was agreeing that the market spoke in this situation, but it is very rare. Normally when a person makes a controversial statement, the person is removed and there is an uproar, but it dies down...
Only the uncontrolled market responds. This is a VERY rare example. The controlled market never responds.
Jesse Jackson no longer being relevant is icing on the cake.