This isn't about biology, it's about philosophy...Dawkins is weak on that. To get a more honest and consistent atheistic position, I would read Bertrand Russell.
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: johnnylightnin; Keyword(s):
This isn't about biology, it's about philosophy...Dawkins is weak on that. To get a more honest and consistent atheistic position, I would read Bertrand Russell.
A plausible natural cause is not sufficient to conclude that causation is natural. It's a philosophical decision to only accept natural explanations, not a scientific one.
There's a lot more here...
Pascal needed some more time in 1st Corinthians 15.