Search:

Type: Posts; User: inudesu; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.04 seconds.

  1. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    I'm sure they are, but unless CUSA is planning to sponsor rodeo, they've got a ways to go.
  2. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Joined the 'Belt when we did in 1991. 30 years!

    But the writing had been on the wall here. Rumors are UTA is being courted by several conferences (SL, WAC, MVC). I've asked around here, but I...
  3. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    https://andywittry.substack.com/p/could-the-wac-which-officially-adds
  4. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    I wonder about some of those instances in conference realignment where it really looked like a close thing between who was going to be doing the robbing and who was going to get robbed. Obviously,...
  5. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Boise exploring the AAC.

    In quality terms, that might actually make them darn near a "P6" conference. In practical terms, it would mean very little. Money and access will still be hugely...
  6. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Interesting.

    Seems. . . like a gamble, but after having the geography of the Sunbelt thrown in our faces for the entire time we were in the WAC (which worked out ok for us I'd say) I wouldn't want...
  7. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Yeah. What happened here.

    That conference had some history, seemed steady - no geographic issues to speak of.
  8. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    I don't see why UCA would be interested in the ASUN over the Southland. Seems like the SL has better (and closer) programs. Maybe I'm wrong though, I certainly don't know the ins and outs of FCS...
  9. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    The Zorros!



    Simon Fraser plays in the NCAA.
  10. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    SBC put a seminary in San Francisco for the same reason they put one in New Orleans -
  11. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Yikes. If I'm Idaho or NMSU, I really sweating that vote.

    I just listened to a podcast this week where a journalist mentioned in passing that off the record the other SB schools will tell you that...
  12. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    That whole article was written like a message board fan post. "The conference should do this and that big step because it will help my team." I've read a million of these through our time in the WAC...
  13. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Is this good logic? Officials don't want to split scarce resources any further, but since they're going to be low anyway, he thinks we should split them?

    I guess he goes on to try to make the...
  14. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Those are very big and important differences. And obviously, those numbers justify any school leaving CUSA for the "Big" East even if it just ends up being the old CUSA.

    But that difference is...
  15. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Look at the current BE membership.

    Look at all the teams invited to CUSA before we were.

    It's not just marketing. I agree that we offer more to a conference than many of those schools do. But...
  16. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    Well, sure. If we had more fans we'd be more attractive (because we'd have more money and draw bigger ratings, etc.). There are any number of reasons we don't have more fans.

    But...
  17. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    But this is about money.

    It's the demographics of North Louisiana not the mindset of the people living there that has Tech in CUSA instead of the "Big" East.
  18. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    http://www.mwcconnection.com/2013/2/11/3978514/big-east-tv-deal-nbc-sports

    BE tv deal.

    Not knocking anyone's socks off.
  19. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    But that is the reason that you can't just split the conjectured list up above down the middle.

    From a Tech standpoint, it just looks like a no-brainer decision (just like most non-Tech folks...
  20. Replies
    338
    Views
    196,001

    Sticky: Re: Comprehensive Conference Realignment Thread

    We'd love it, but it's the ole "why isn't Tech in the SunBelt" argument we've heard for years from the standpoint of Houston and SMU (and UCF/USF).
Results 1 to 20 of 20