Search:

MTSU should be 4, they beat charlotte both times. I think Charlotte goes to 6th with Rice's win.

Doesnt matter! We get 3.

You are reading 2b, which hinges on there still being a tie after the round robin. Which there isnt.

We would not go to rule 2b, so that clause is not applicable.

Actually, rereading, that doesnt seem to apply.
Between 3 teams, by rule 2a (with #) they should simply be seeded by winning percentage. It doesnt say it suddenly turns into a two way tie, as it is...

Also, that rule just seems rediculous in this case when it gives teams in the same division (I know its not seperated in basketball, but schedule wise it pretty much is) a bonus fo simply playing...

Interesting. If luck falls on our side we wont have to worry about it.

Is there precedent of that happening?

Why would charlotte get that? If the Tie breaker falls to a record between 3 teams, why would you revert to a H2H between two teams that arent tied record-wise?

I had a lapse in thought a few days ago. MTSU wins, Charlotte wins out, Rice loses: MTSU-Tech-Charlotte would be tied. MT would be 2-1, us 1-1, Charlotte 1-2.

MTSU beat ODU 65-47. Charlotte leading FAU 51-28 in 3rd.

Rice lead 9-8 early.

Tourney feels pretty wide open.

Wow. Huh.

Just need a Rice win or Charlotte loss!

And UTSA knocking UAB back to second would be huge for us as well!

Thats where Im trying to get at. If we win, MTSU wins, Rice beats NT, and Charlotte wins out, all of us are 10-6. When doing H2H records, would we not do our record against all 3? All four have...

We just need to win. As it is, if we win, Rice beats NT, Middle Tennessee wins, and Charlotte wins their last two. All of us end 10-6.

As long as both us and MTSU win, I think we dont have to...

They can absolutely win it all with consistent performances more like Rice and USM. And lose the first day with performances like Charlotte.