Search:

Type: Posts; User: THEarmada; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Search: Search took 0.02 seconds.

  1. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    You'd argue with yourself. I am debating you on the differences in SCNT and natural fertilization. Which are not to greatly different but are different.
  2. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I don't know why you are baiting me to getting into this "rights" talk. Why do you assign me to a fold, which brings to mind imagery of sheep? I don't recall making an arguement that a right to...
  3. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    1) Yes. Fundamentally our species is perpetuated by the development of an embryo within the uterus of a female. It matters because that is natures means of conducting business. And for now we...
  4. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    The distinction is in the way they are derived. I haven't said what intrinsic rights one or the other has. I haven't said whether or not I think the derivision is wrong. For a SCNT to revert back...
  5. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I'm saying that a SCNT is not an embryo. One occurs naturally, one does not. Go ahead and start debating whether it deserves "rights" or not. I'm not sure what rights that embryos in a petri dish...
  6. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    1) A cancer cell is not a natural cell type found in the sequence of events that has perpetuated our species.

    2) Is a sperm naturally viable to become a human? No. Is an egg naturally viable to...
  7. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    The product of somatic cell nuclear transfer is a creation in the laboratory that does NOT occur in nature. Whether you feel its right or wrong is another discussion for another day. But the...
  8. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I just wanted to know everyones position, and I figured that I already knew yours and guiss.
  9. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    How do those who see nothing wrong with abortion feel about sex selection abortion? That is, aborting a baby because it is not the parent's gender of preference.
  10. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    Yeah man. They were so intolerant.
  11. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    Guiss, I like your new avatar.
  12. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    What makes you think that's the case?
  13. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I'd be curious to know if there is a strong push from the medical community for this.
  14. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    Huss, have you seen Supersize Me?
  15. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I understand your point.
  16. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    Do you think its naive to believe that this bill might be appropriate simply as a means to inform a patient more thoroughly. Not neccessarily trying to prevent the procedure, but just trying to...
  17. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    You'd be okay with the government overturning RvW?
  18. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    Where did I make that statement? Whether or not that's my stance on the issue...I never vocalized an opinion one way or another about the being involved outside of voicing an opinion.
  19. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    Let's not play the sexism card. The fact of the matter is this is a situation that to most (not me because I think that the man has a right to voice an opinion) only involves a woman, so the...
  20. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I swear you guys will argue with the most neutral posts. I however do not have as much faith as you in the sensical choices of others who are under extreme stress.
  21. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I'm not sure how I feel about the actual law. Hardly have to time to think about much with this rapid fire posting. It takes me about 30 minutes just to catch up most of the time. I will however few...
  22. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    So what about the fact that twins, "fight" over space within the womb. One twin puts pressure against the other and the other reactes inturn with his own kick. I guess that's random and he's really...
  23. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    I'm not talking about pro bono (sp?) work, I'm talkin about doctors on salaries with insurers and such.
  24. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    That is incorrect.
  25. Re: Bill requiring Ultrasound prior to Abortion before SC House

    Just an interesting side note or are you implying that objectivists are smarter than everyone else?
Results 1 to 25 of 49
Page 1 of 2 1 2