Search:

Type: Posts; User: CaseyDawg; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Re: Bad News for Tech and Good News for the Sunbelt

    It is certainly debatable if these agreements are bad for Tech (time will tell), but it certainly is not good and it will be good for the Sunbelt.


    At the end of this year both the WAC and...
  2. Re: Bad News for Tech and Good News for the Sunbelt

    When the nearest bowl-tie in is 1000 miles from Ruston, any opportunities taken away for a closer game (even if it requires conference not qualifying enough teams) is not good for Tech. Although I do...
  3. Re: Bad News for Tech and Good News for the Sunbelt

    Degrade the Sunbelt all you want. Just don’t look at the standing for the last two seasons when the Sunbelt had two teams with at least 7 wins. Plus additional teams, ULM & ULL, at 6 wins and bowl...
  4. Re: Bad News for Tech and Good News for the Sunbelt

    You can bet that if both Tech and ULL were setting at 6-6 or 7-5 at the end of this season, and Birmingham or Shreveport had an opening you would know.
  5. Bad News for Tech and Good News for the Sunbelt

    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3500305
    The Sunbelt announced contracts to place teams in St. Petersburg, Birmingham, and Shreveport in the event that the SEC, Big 12, CUSA, or Big East...
Results 1 to 5 of 5