2001 SMU wasn't that bad. I'll even admit to rather enjoying 2010 vs. the G-Men.
But UTEP in 2002 (maybe 03?) was a low, low point.
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: Champ967; Keyword(s):
2001 SMU wasn't that bad. I'll even admit to rather enjoying 2010 vs. the G-Men.
But UTEP in 2002 (maybe 03?) was a low, low point.
Ruh-roh! Now you've done it!
But yes, I agree. Indy has a long history as Tech football's second home. If playing in S'port can bring Tech a top-10 matchup, I'm all for it.
Did you completely miss the discussion on the correlation between attendance and local population?
Cuz I really dont want to go over it again.
Attendance-ball is only meaningful as a function of surrounding population. Attendees at any sporting event in America -- from the NFC championship to 6yo t-ball-- are overwhelmingly from within a...
It was last year. Hardly an arbitrary figure. But pick a different year, or a rolling average. Either way, it scarcely moves the needle as a function of surrounding population. A single 31k game,...
Why? It aint like yall are using it?
ULL 2017 avg attendance ~ 16k
Lafayette Parish ~ 225k
ULL games / local pop ~ 7%
Tech 2017 attendance ~ 20k
Lincoln Parish ~ 47k
Tech games / local pop...
If I cared …
I would've suggested South Louisiana.
22 years.
That was an odd season. Beat Miss St on the road. Gave the Hogs all they could handle in LR.
Then laid an egg at home vs the Cajuns.
Can somebody please find the old picture of the recruiting trailer with Richard Simmons and the airboat and the shopping cart?
I can giggle at that for hours. Ok, minutes. But still ...
To hell with Dawg06 and his lame-ass "facts".
I bet he doesnt even have a scholarship name for him. Loser.
OMG! You have a REAL SCHOLARSHIP named for you?! (I cant believe you've never mentioned that before!)
Wow, that changes everything. You must be really important.
We are all going to agree...
We would have enough money for another assistant if we played nlu.