Search:

An example of you following another prophet who calls his own predictions “fascinatingly prophetic”.

Another specific prophecy aligning specific events of today and predicting outcomes based on past prophecy, which is itself prophecy.

See, you even called this opinion prophetic. I can easily find many more examples just in this thread.

I don’t personally care if you are a false prophet, just wanted to make sure you were aware that you are prophesying.

And since what you say is not 100% true, according to the definition you posted, that would make you a FALSE prophet.

According to Wikipedia

“A prophecy is a message that is claimed by a prophet to have been communicated to them by a god. Such messages typically involve inspiration, interpretation, or revelation...

Right, since a real “false prophet” has to specify a date or year.

And according to yourself you have been prophesying imminent end times since 1997 (more than 20 years), so that kind of makes you both a false prophet and a scientist that can’t move on once your...

You are quoting bible verses while prophesying that the rapture is near. That is what this whole thread was (and apparently another thread that the OP couldn’t locate).

Well, if you make prophecy...that makes you a prophet, and, if you are wrong, a false one.

This thread is full of your prophecy.

Do you think a false prophet necessarily knows they are a false prophet? If you are providing vague prophecies that aren’t true, wouldn’t that make one a false prophet?

Are you saying you aren’t a prophet because you aren’t being specific enough?

Aren’t you predicting end times based on certain events?

How do you know that isn’t you?

Ray, what about the fact that you are a false prophet?

That wasn’t a shot at his base - it was a shot at Trump’s convictions and the idea that he is communicating with any god other than his own ego.

Non sequitur.

Don’t kid yourself. He is just playing to his base.

If so, that would be what you call a self-fulfilling prophecy in that it was the Christian Zionists that were leading the charge on moving the embassy. Everyone knew this was a move that would...

Are you saying that religionists haven’t upheld anti-progressive ideals particularly around who can marry who?

Hell, Bob Jones University didn’t lift its ban on interracial dating until 2000!
...

Actually, “marriage” was not a word at the time the Bible was written.

And it isn’t like the Bible celebrates marriage. It is discouraged, but provided as a concession for those that cannot...

Not that the women really had much choice in the matter back then. Some chose martyrdom over marriage.

I think it is natural for society to progress over time regardless of many of the anti-progressive ideals touted by religionists that hold ancient texts written by ancient men as their standard.
...

Sure, given that it isn’t supernatural. It is atypical for families in general given that homosexuals are only about 5% of the population, but that is not even that rare of a variance within nature. ...

It certainly is part of the traditional concept of a family. But restricting it to couples that can and do intend to have children makes no logical sense.