Or we would be playing in a very bare bones facility with basically just seating and a scoreboard - which would be ok - once conference play started
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: Dwayne From Minden; Keyword(s):
Or we would be playing in a very bare bones facility with basically just seating and a scoreboard - which would be ok - once conference play started
And the rumblings of 20+ trains daily for 50+ years with cheap construction and you have all the evidence you need for the major structural problems before the storm ever hit...
And add into the fact that it was constructed in 1970-1971 and state construction contracts during that time (EWE era) were iffy at best where quality and specifications were concerned...
FEMA uses C/B analysis as part of their cost determinations -
I haven't heard ANYTHING from inside of Tech that varies from the initial assessment that baseball is a total loss
I'm pretty sure...
Suites are a must for revenue generation - an absolute must
Premium seating is a MUST for revenue generation -
If you want to buy a $100 season pass and sit in the exposed bleachers, then you...
I'm against spending any money - sponsor or program - for things next year at any alternate site
I would rather spend every single red cent at the new facility...
That's what I'm talking about - with a capacity of about 3,000 or so...
I think The Love shack has one of the most picturesque locations in baseball and don't want it to be moved.
That being said the stadium has to be built to at least minimum "suggested"...
All three are least of the problem faced -
I think govt will actually be a bonus on this from Baton Rouge to the City, I don’t see any major flags or hurdles at this point...
But you are missing the point -
It will only cost TECH $9 to $12 million to build a new park with of price tag of $20 million plus...
Hale Hall should be on first base sight line from that area...
I’m not convinced there is not room enough yet, from a google shot there looks to be in the neighborhood of almost 90 feet of wiggle...
That has absolutely nothing to do with the stadium location - that’s a 98% admin issue
I don’t think most of y’all realize the great scenic value of our present location
3,000 permanent is the optimum number
That’s doubling current capacity
Question is do we want to take our time and do it right or do we want to rush just to have something in place for 2020?
...
With insurance $2.3 another $7 to $8 from FEMA, we can bond out $10 million and build something really really nice...
Over 20 years that’s not a heavy debt service....
Hell bond out $20 million...