Search:

Type: Posts; User: Soonerdawg; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.03 seconds.

  1. Replies
    615
    Views
    20,621

    Re: ID not required

    Finally, we agree on something.
  2. Replies
    615
    Views
    20,621

    Re: ID not required

    And, I think I am on the same page as you two are.

    That is why we have to let the scientists be scientists and do their scientist thing. We have to let the theologians do their theologian thing....
  3. Replies
    615
    Views
    20,621

    Re: ID not required

    You are obviously trying to pick a fight with me or at least make fun of my views on what the Bible says about a pre-Adamic flood. I can handle that. But, please understand that I don't really have...
  4. Replies
    615
    Views
    20,621

    Re: ID not required

    Who in this forum is saying it is? I haven't read the full thread. Did DD say it is 6000 years old, or did he merely challenge the accuracy of carbon dating?
  5. Replies
    615
    Views
    20,621

    Re: ID not required

    Pre-first flood. Genesis 1:1-2.
  6. Replies
    615
    Views
    20,621

    Re: ID not required

    That wouldn't impress me. The ingeniousness of our world continues to be explored outwardly and nano-ly. The fact that the small detail of how the universe would have been included would not...
Results 1 to 6 of 6